On Sun, Jun 09, 2013 at 13:03 -0400, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: > On Sun, Jun 09, 2013 at 06:24:25PM +0200, Thomas Koch wrote:
> > So your plan to fork javahelper and to create just another packaging tool > > terrified me. Are you really sure that you need to fork javahelper and that > > you > > can not extend javahelper for your needs? > > Terrified is a bit strong. > > There won't be code copies if we can prevent it (it'd have to be really > unexpected at this point) and extend / wrap the existing tool where we can't. I agree wholeheartedly with this. It might make sense to clarify this in the GSoC project description lest other people also be misled. -- Wolodja <deb...@babilen5.org> 4096R/CAF14EFC 081C B7CD FF04 2BA9 94EA 36B2 8B7F 7D30 CAF1 4EFC
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
