Re: Re: maven-debian-helper: dependency org.kohsuke github-api not found

2024-05-18 Thread Tobias Hilbricht
:20040801 com.formdev:flatlaf:jar:3.2.5 I read https://wiki.debian.org/Java/MavenRepoHelper and found mh_installjar and thought I do it like this: root@syke:/home/tobias/zettelkasten# mh_installjar -l -- package=zettelkasten pom.xml /home/tobias/zettelkasten/target/Zettelkasten.app/Contents/Java

Re: Re: maven-debian-helper: dependency org.kohsuke github-api not found

2024-05-18 Thread Tobias Hilbricht
Pierre, thank you for your advice, I will dig into it. Tobias

maven-debian-helper: dependency org.kohsuke github-api not found

2024-05-17 Thread Tobias Hilbricht
ggestions here https://wiki.debian.org/Java/Packaging/FAQ I do not find a corresponding debian package, but on maven it exists: https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.kohsuke/github-api How can I satisfy the dependency in a Debian way? Thanks for helpful pointers Tobias

RFS: stegosuite/0.8.0-1

2017-10-13 Thread Tobias
deal with stegosuite.appdata.xml in stegosuite.install * add png to mime type in desktop file * ignore junit instead of testng * update file location in copyright * add libcommons-cli-java to dependencies * update patches * update manpage It would be great if someone could upload this. Regards, Tobias

Re: O: libjava-jdbc-clojure -- Clojure interface to sql databases via jdbc

2017-05-31 Thread Tobias Frost
Control: merge 863781 -1 Filed accidentially twice. The other bug is #863781. NOTE: Daigo *is* active, the #863780 below was using the wrong template. (He asked me to orphan this package on his behalv) -- tobi signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#863780: O: libjava-jdbc-clojure -- Clojure interface to sql databases via jdbc

2017-05-31 Thread Tobias Frost
Package: wnpp (CC'ing the Java packaging team) The current maintainer of libjava-jdbc-clojure, Daigo Moriwaki , is apparently not active anymore. Therefore, I orphan this package now. Maintaining a package requires time and skills. Please only adopt this package if you will have enough time an

Re: RFS: stegosuite/0.7.3-1 [ITP]

2016-06-13 Thread Tobias
d a comment which will hopefully signal this. Regards, Tobias

Re: RFS: stegosuite/0.7.3-1 [ITP]

2016-06-13 Thread Tobias
rify these comments with a few words. Hmm, a comment mentioning that some parts are adapted from stackoverflow? Are there any other debian packages doing this? And if it's not copyrightable, then why mentioning it in debian/copyright? Regards, Tobias

RFS: stegosuite/0.7.3-1 [ITP]

2016-06-12 Thread Tobias
ince 0.7.2: Rewrote a class in order to resolve a license incompatibility between EPL and GPL. It would be great if someone could upload this. Regards, Tobias

Re: stegosuite_0.7.2-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2016-06-08 Thread Tobias
On 08.06.2016 11:10, Markus Koschany wrote: > More problematic is the following. The EPL is incompatible with the GPL. Alright. I will rewrite that class in order to remove the EPL dependency. The result will be published in 0.7.3. Regards, Tobias

Re: RFS: stegosuite/0.7.2-1 [ITP]

2016-06-03 Thread Tobias
work. > Please add keywords to stegosuite.desktop. Done > What do you think about adding another subcategory to the desktop file > like: Categories=Graphics;ImageProcessing; ? ImageProcessing seems to belong to Science/Education. I used Graphics;2DGraphics;RasterGraphics; instead. Regards, Tobias

RFS: stegosuite/0.7.2-1 [ITP]

2016-06-02 Thread Tobias
e great if someone could upload this. Regards, Tobias

Re: New steganography application

2016-05-24 Thread Tobias
Hi, I added a man page and filed an ITP bug report. Do you think it can be uploaded now? Regards, Tobias

Re: New steganography application

2016-05-22 Thread Tobias
man page wouldn't make much sense, I guess? Regards, Tobias

Re: New steganography application

2016-05-16 Thread Tobias
go > Suite" [1], whose name is trademarked. I'm not sure you can use the same > name for your project. The website seems to be outdated. They recommend Windows 98. ;) I don't think it's trademarked (anymore). I searched in various trademark databases and could find anything like "Stego Suite". Regards, Tobias

Re: New steganography application

2016-05-14 Thread Tobias
Regards, Tobias

Re: RFS: swt4-gtk 4.5.0-3

2016-05-09 Thread Tobias
ony Hi, the update is still not available in unstable. Is there any issue, which needs to be resolved first? Regards, Tobias

Re: New steganography application

2016-04-06 Thread Tobias
s -uc but it failed because it couldn't find swt. I got errors like "package org.eclipse.swt.graphics does not exist" and so on. Regards, Tobias On 05.04.2016 23:26, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > If you install liblogback-java and libjcommander-java this will help > mh_make fig

Re: New steganography application

2016-04-05 Thread Tobias
Hi Markus, Thanks for your help. When running mh_make, it couldn't find the dependencies swt, logback and jcommander. But after ignoring that it created the debian directory. I guess, I need to write something in maven.rules now? Regards, Tobias On 04.04.2016 17:31, Markus Koschany wrote:

Re: New steganography application

2016-04-03 Thread Tobias
Hi Markus, thanks for your reply. I would really like to join the team and maintain the software in the future! I had looked at the packaging process but it seemed to me very complicated at first sight. That's why I asked here. Regards, Tobias On 03.04.2016 21:01, Markus Koschany

New steganography application

2016-04-02 Thread Tobias
ation which is easy to use, even for people who know very little or nothing about steganography. It's written in Java 8 and uses SWT as widget toolkit. Here is the project page: https://dev.stegosuite.org/Stegosuite/Stegosuite Is there anybody who would like to package it? Best regards, Tobias

Re: Confused about gcj's java/javac and kaffe

2004-04-06 Thread Tobias Eichert
On Tuesday 06 April 2004 15:57, Tobias Eichert wrote: > Hello list, > I'm some kind of confused about the naming schemes within the gcj* packages > and kaffe. 'gcj-3.3' and 'libgcj4' provide their own java/javac executables > (actually they are wrappers for gcj

Confused about gcj's java/javac and kaffe

2004-04-06 Thread Tobias Eichert
table branch for now) provides it's java/javac executables on its own. Are there any notable differences? At least Sun's java/javac is considerably slower. :-) If anybody can shed some light on this, I'd be very thankful. Best Regards, Tobias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EM

Re: FAQ-java draft

2000-02-20 Thread Tobias Hagge
Perhaps a section on debugging java programs within debian would be useful. What free java debuggers are available (as alternatives to jdb) on Debian? ( any??? ) What free edit-interactive/graphical debugging tools are available on Debian? (jde, ddd, more???) My version of jdb (jdb version 98/01