On Tuesday 06 April 2004 15:57, Tobias Eichert wrote: > Hello list, > I'm some kind of confused about the naming schemes within the gcj* packages > and kaffe. 'gcj-3.3' and 'libgcj4' provide their own java/javac executables > (actually they are wrappers for gcj's executables). I guess kaffe (which > seems to be only in the unstable branch for now) provides it's java/javac > executables on its own. Are there any notable differences? At least Sun's > java/javac is considerably slower. :-) > > If anybody can shed some light on this, I'd be very thankful. > > Best Regards, > Tobias
Hm. 'apt-cache depends kaffe' reveals that it doesn't depend on gjc et al. (I thought so...) - so it's an implementation of its own. Sorry for bugging you.. Tobias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
