* Fadly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000424 20:20]:
> i'm sorry if for posting this stupid question ..
> Actually i plan to make an irc client using java
> but any sample programs that came to me using applet+servlet ..
> all i wanna build is just an irc client which will connect to
> irc server using java
Hello Andreas,
I am sorry, I don't run java servlets, nor do I know where to start. Nor
do I know the answer to your question.
But, I can ask a question: rather than depend upon System.out and
System.err, why not open a brand new file, say /tmp/debugger, and send
all your debugging there? If you
Hello everyone.
For my aforementioned encryption program, I was rather hoping to use
Sun's BigInteger implemention. It has a constructor that can accept
arrays of bytes, and a method to return an array of bytes.
I could take an egotistical American view of the world, and cast chars
into bytes --
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000404 01:50]:
> >I wasn't planning on blazing new territory. :)
> That's too bad. We can always have more trailblazers ;)
Maybe in a few years time, I will try my hand at my own encryption
scheme. For now, implementing existing ones will be difficult (and
Javi -- you may wish to put today's date next to notes such as "program
xxx is broken in fashion yyy" -- it might not be broken on at date
zzz++.
:)
* Stephane Bortzmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000404 01:10]:
> On Monday 3 April 2000, at 18 h 24, the keyboard of Javier Fdz-Sanguino Pen~a
> <[EMAIL
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000403 03:27]:
> > Or, should I perhaps be more interested in coming up with a stream
> > cipher that I could use in conjunction with the java streams?
>
> Sounds like you don't have much experience in the crypto field. Given that,
> you should NOT try to i
Greetings everyone,
I am in the designing stages of writing a cryptographic program in Java.
I would like to take instances of Object and encrypt them before sending
them to another Java client.
My question: can I run Objects through a method
encryptObjectUsingThisKey(Object o, Key k) on one comp
* John Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000227 23:16]:
> away. Is this really a Java problem in Potato or is Netscape crapped
> out. I do not have this problem on my stable Slink systems, and the
Someone correct me if I am wrong, but netscape communicator uses its own
JRE; it does not depend on the loc
On Sun, Feb 06, 2000 at 02:58:55PM +0200, oliver d tali wrote:
> the way i actually solved the problem is the following: i created a
> script with the right classpaths etc. and the full command line which
> should start my app. after trying this an that, somehow i taught, the
> old screen uti
Well, I am not an expert in such things, but somethings that might work for
you...
I *think* what you are aiming for is a way to run the program in the system
init scripts yourself -- there is an /etc/init.d/skeleton file that you can
copy to a new file, edit, and then make symbolic links to it in
To the best of my knowledge, the whole jar file is transferred; therefore,
it would make sense to include in the .jar only the files actually needed.
:)
On Fri, Feb 04, 2000 at 05:37:34PM +0100, Michael Meskes wrote:
> If I write some software and want to execute it in
> netscape/mozilla/whateve
Well, it *could* be packaged for debian, there is nothing against that in
the license. What *IS* illegal is *using* it under debian.
So, afaict, no one has plans on packaging it, but there exists a
package: ibm-jdk1.1-installer that you might find useful.. :)
On Sun, Jan 30, 2000 at 05:05:25
I am currently running frozen, and I found this information on it.
Perhaps pertinent to your situation is the Architecture: i386 line. It might
not hurt to email the maintainer and see if a ultrasparc port has been made.
Since it is in the contrib section, that means it failed some part of the
DFSG
I don't know if this will fix anything, but try jpeg -- it isn't encumbered
by patents, afaik, but .gif is. If jpeg works, then I think you can safely
assume .gif won't go. If jpeg doesn't work, then ... :)
time for class hth
On Mon, Jan 24, 2000 at 03:03:38PM -0500, Spectron International,
When the whole mess came up to begin with, I sent an email over to our
friend Bruce Perens. He said that before he talked with IBM, he wanted
something hashed out in debian-legal. I myself never started the thread;
finals were too imposing.
It might be a Good Idea to bring it up on debian-legal;
On Mon, Nov 08, 1999 at 05:26:55PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > - ease of use for new users (no .bashrc to edit) and for the sysadmin
> > (there is no way in Unix to set a system-wide env. variable), -
> > consistency between a shell into xterm ran by Gnome, a shell made after
> > a telnet/r
On Sun, Nov 07, 1999 at 03:30:07PM +0100, Stefan Gybas wrote:
> While we are at it: I already expressed my dislike for the naming scheme
> in the policy (lib-X-java) which is taken from C libraries. I propose to
> use the scheme from Phyton instead (java-X). What do other people think
> about this?
is an operating
> system rather than a language. Implementation of the java 2.0 specs may
> not be constrained by sun's license, although I'm not sure.
>
> Jim
>
> Seth R Arnold wrote:
> >
> > John, there is one point you raised I am not sure I agree with:
On Thu, Sep 16, 1999 at 12:06:25AM +0100, bernd kreimeier wrote:
> > Java is being taught in many schools, mine included, as the default
> >
> > Some very nice points, but I doubt the hurd will be able to serve as the
> > magic bullet.
> >
> > comments?
>
>
> Java the language (sans all the add
John, there is one point you raised I am not sure I agree with:
> 8. A HURD VM is possible due to the nature of its message passing system
> and would be the most reasonable course to pursue for the development of
> portable software. This course would basically make Java obsolete, and
> would all
On Wed, Sep 15, 1999 at 12:55:21PM -0500, Ean R . Schuessler wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 15, 1999 at 09:30:44AM -0700, Cris J. Holdorph wrote:
> > Ean R . Schuessler Writes:
> > > Now, maybe you can show me a way of getting specs from Sun that would
> > > waive
> > > you of this liability, but I don't kn
On Tue, Sep 14, 1999 at 10:25:52PM -0700, Cris J. Holdorph wrote:
> Seth R Arnold Writes:
> After re-reading his message, he did not state what the "fork" would be.
> So, he would have to provide clarification himself.
Fair enough. :)
> But I thought, his idea was, "b
On Tue, Sep 14, 1999 at 09:30:23PM -0700, Cris J. Holdorph wrote:
> Ean R . Schuessler Writes:
> > So, what can we do about it? I have been giving the subject some small
> > amount of thought and have been having conversations with Tim
> > Wilkinson (Kaffe) for almost a year now. My opinion is that
On Tue, Sep 14, 1999 at 11:24:35PM -0500, Ean R . Schuessler wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 14, 1999 at 11:11:43PM -0300, Julio wrote:
> > Can a virtual package have a version (to be set by a 'real' package that
> > implements it)? If so, it'd be useful to have java-virtual-machine packages
> > to set thei
Ean, Staphane... I think I understand how each of you two feel; however,
I would like to remind you guys that this whole thing is supposed to be
fun. :) This is sort of degenerating into a bit of a flame war; perhaps
before responding to future messages (including this one? :) take a few
minutes t
Stephane, it might be best to file the bugreports upstream.. the problems in
kaffe also apply to redhat, suse, and probably non-linux distributions too.
On Mon, Sep 06, 1999 at 03:58:55PM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
>
> Many Java programs in Debian work with th
26 matches
Mail list logo
