16:07:31 -0600
From: "J. R. Westmoreland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Seth Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Fw: tomcat and apache troubles
X-Operating-System: Linux orthanc 2.4.4-pre3
I'm sorry. Let me try again.
I was trying to finish writing the message before catching th
16:07:31 -0600
From: "J. R. Westmoreland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Seth Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Fw: tomcat and apache troubles
X-Operating-System: Linux orthanc 2.4.4-pre3
I'm sorry. Let me try again.
I was trying to finish writing the message before catching th
J.R., a general rule that must be broken only in dire circumstances --
what were you doing, what did you expect to happen, what actually
happened. :)
My *guess* suggests that you tried making symbolic link into a directory
where you don't have write access. Either make the link as root (with su
or
J.R., a general rule that must be broken only in dire circumstances --
what were you doing, what did you expect to happen, what actually
happened. :)
My *guess* suggests that you tried making symbolic link into a directory
where you don't have write access. Either make the link as root (with su
o
* Munir Chhibber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010423 19:02]:
> i have 3 years of experience in java.recently bought a helio and would luv to
> work on it using java but wan't some info about going about it.
> like getting linux and what jvm is available for development using it.
[BTW -- does this list hav
* Munir Chhibber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010423 19:02]:
> i have 3 years of experience in java.recently bought a helio and would luv to
> work on it using java but wan't some info about going about it.
> like getting linux and what jvm is available for development using it.
[BTW -- does this list ha
* Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010406 04:41]:
> Well to me it seems that this system will have some name clashes.
> Why not use the debian package name?
The initial revitalization of this thread comes from Per Bothner. His
own machine is Red Hat, and he seems pretty happy with it. :) He chos
* Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010406 04:09]:
> Build:
> Is it possible to create a script that generates this automaticly?
> Like a dh_javadeps... It should also generate the dependencies
> in the control file...
I like this idea. It *ought* to be fairly straightforward (famous last
w
* Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010406 04:41]:
> Well to me it seems that this system will have some name clashes.
> Why not use the debian package name?
The initial revitalization of this thread comes from Per Bothner. His
own machine is Red Hat, and he seems pretty happy with it. :) He cho
* Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010406 04:09]:
> Build:
> Is it possible to create a script that generates this automaticly?
> Like a dh_javadeps... It should also generate the dependencies
> in the control file...
I like this idea. It *ought* to be fairly straightforward (famous last
* Egon Willighagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010405 00:14]:
> This would certainly be a good option... If we good get it as flexible
> as the proposed Perl launcher
I've got to throw in my two cents: I too hate the idea of using any sort
of script to start execution of 'native-looking' Java program
* Egon Willighagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010405 00:14]:
> This would certainly be a good option... If we good get it as flexible
> as the proposed Perl launcher
I've got to throw in my two cents: I too hate the idea of using any sort
of script to start execution of 'native-looking' Java progra
* Per Bothner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010403 00:01]:
> Well, I'm not focusing on Debian - I'm actually currently using Red Hat.
Aha; I assumed you used Debian because you have posted in debian-java
before, over the course of several months IIRC.
I imagine that most any improvements in handling Java
* Egon Willighagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010402 22:58]:
> Op dinsdag 03 april 2001 02:43, schreef Per Bothner:
> > I'd like to make some progress on standard Linux/GNU installation
> > standards for Java, and how GCJ fits into this.
(Per, glad to see you are interested in making Java as cool in Deb
* Per Bothner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010403 00:01]:
> Well, I'm not focusing on Debian - I'm actually currently using Red Hat.
Aha; I assumed you used Debian because you have posted in debian-java
before, over the course of several months IIRC.
I imagine that most any improvements in handling Java
* Egon Willighagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010402 22:58]:
> Op dinsdag 03 april 2001 02:43, schreef Per Bothner:
> > I'd like to make some progress on standard Linux/GNU installation
> > standards for Java, and how GCJ fits into this.
(Per, glad to see you are interested in making Java as cool in De
* Bao Ha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010402 12:24]:
> I have a swing-based applet that I would like to build a test suite
> using some tools like dejagnu.
If DejaGNU can do GUI tests, then thank you for the wonderful bit of
news. :) If DejaGNU cannot do GUI tests, then take a look around for
testing arti
* Bao Ha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010402 12:24]:
> I have a swing-based applet that I would like to build a test suite
> using some tools like dejagnu.
If DejaGNU can do GUI tests, then thank you for the wonderful bit of
news. :) If DejaGNU cannot do GUI tests, then take a look around for
testing art
[Alex, please wrap your lines at 74 characters. Thank you.]
* Alexander Hvostov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010315 11:51]:
> On Thu, 15 Mar 2001 06:15:53 -0500
> Benjamin Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > i think a better question is why has this thread been going on this long?
> If you want to know
[Alex, please wrap your lines at 74 characters. Thank you.]
* Alexander Hvostov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010315 11:51]:
> On Thu, 15 Mar 2001 06:15:53 -0500
> Benjamin Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > i think a better question is why has this thread been going on this long?
> If you want to kno
* Matthew Sherborne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010312 12:29]:
> I'm using the jde package, originally with the blackdown compiler etc.
Hmm. I have the j2sdk1.3 package installed. If you add the line:
deb ftp://metalab.unc.edu/pub/linux/devel/lang/java/blackdown.org/debian woody
non-free
to your /etc/a
* Matthew Sherborne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010312 12:29]:
> I'm using the jde package, originally with the blackdown compiler etc.
Hmm. I have the j2sdk1.3 package installed. If you add the line:
deb ftp://metalab.unc.edu/pub/linux/devel/lang/java/blackdown.org/debian woody non-free
to your /etc/a
* Bob Ham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010312 03:25]:
> I was under the impression that Gcj's main purpose was to build a java
> compiler, as opposed to Kaffe's which was to build a VM, having KJC as
> an aside. Did I miss something?
Because gcj can compile directly to native machine code, gcj can compet
* Bob Ham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010312 03:25]:
> I was under the impression that Gcj's main purpose was to build a java
> compiler, as opposed to Kaffe's which was to build a VM, having KJC as
> an aside. Did I miss something?
Because gcj can compile directly to native machine code, gcj can compe
* Alexander Hvostov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010302 18:23]:
> Those who believe Java and free software is a sad landscape are woefully
> unaware of reality... If this were the case, why does GNU seem to
> wholeheartedly support it? They even have a page devoted to GNU Java
> software!
I think we may n
* Alexander Hvostov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010302 18:23]:
> Those who believe Java and free software is a sad landscape are woefully
> unaware of reality... If this were the case, why does GNU seem to
> wholeheartedly support it? They even have a page devoted to GNU Java
> software!
I think we may
* Artur Radosz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010302 01:58]:
> > non-free is not part of Debian. realplayer comes only as an installer.
>
> For me it`s :). It`s listed in installer. Mirorred on your sites.
> Packaged in .deb.
Don't get too happy with non-free. It almost got cut a few months back,
and I do
* Artur Radosz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010302 01:10]:
> > Artur, the problem is very simple. I hope I can explain it simply enoug
> > Debian is about Free Software. Free as in BSD, GPL, LGPL, Artistic,
> > XFree86, etc. All these licenses satisfy the requirements of the Debian
>
> What about non-free
* Artur Radosz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010302 01:58]:
> > non-free is not part of Debian. realplayer comes only as an installer.
>
> For me it`s :). It`s listed in installer. Mirorred on your sites.
> Packaged in .deb.
Don't get too happy with non-free. It almost got cut a few months back,
and I d
* Artur Radosz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010302 01:10]:
> > Artur, the problem is very simple. I hope I can explain it simply enoug
> > Debian is about Free Software. Free as in BSD, GPL, LGPL, Artistic,
> > XFree86, etc. All these licenses satisfy the requirements of the Debian
>
> What about non-fre
* Alexander Hvostov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010301 22:35]:
> That's why you create classes under packages other than `java' or
> `javax'. The Java API proper is in the `java' and `javax' packages, and
> Sun is simply trying to keep Java consistent across implementations by
> using their IP powers to m
* Alexander Hvostov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010301 21:31]:
> > is their implementation of Java Not Free, the API itself is also Not
> > Free and cannot be reproduced without licensing from Sun.
>
> I suggest getting some lawyers on the task, then.
With what money? :)
> Last time I checked, there wa
* Alan KF LAU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010301 20:32]:
> Also one of the very annoying thing in kaffe bother me much is that it
> has not implemented java.security. It is a mistake or an intention to
> make Java insecure? See
> http://www.kaffe.org/cgi-bin/kaffe/security?user=guest;addsignature=1
I th
* Alexander Hvostov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010301 22:35]:
> That's why you create classes under packages other than `java' or
> `javax'. The Java API proper is in the `java' and `javax' packages, and
> Sun is simply trying to keep Java consistent across implementations by
> using their IP powers to
* Alexander Hvostov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010301 19:49]:
> Sun did not license Java in a non-free manner. They licensed _their
> implementation_ of Java in a non-free manner. Java itself is not subject
> to a license of any kind, but just some straightforward IP protections to
> keep people (like Mi
* Alexander Hvostov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010301 21:31]:
> > is their implementation of Java Not Free, the API itself is also Not
> > Free and cannot be reproduced without licensing from Sun.
>
> I suggest getting some lawyers on the task, then.
With what money? :)
> Last time I checked, there w
* Alan KF LAU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010301 20:32]:
> Also one of the very annoying thing in kaffe bother me much is that it
> has not implemented java.security. It is a mistake or an intention to
> make Java insecure? See
> http://www.kaffe.org/cgi-bin/kaffe/security?user=guest;addsignature=1
I t
* Alexander Hvostov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010301 19:49]:
> Sun did not license Java in a non-free manner. They licensed _their
> implementation_ of Java in a non-free manner. Java itself is not subject
> to a license of any kind, but just some straightforward IP protections to
> keep people (like M
* Artur Radosz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010301 10:27]:
> Yeah, but with this solution there is no way to include other free java2
> apzz and libs in distribution.
Artur, the problem is very simple. I hope I can explain it simply enough
for you to understand; while languages are often beautiful, engli
* Artur Radosz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010301 10:27]:
> Yeah, but with this solution there is no way to include other free java2
> apzz and libs in distribution.
Artur, the problem is very simple. I hope I can explain it simply enough
for you to understand; while languages are often beautiful, engl
* Aaron Brashears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010118 22:27]:
> I'm researching writing a daemon in Java. Surprisingly, there seems to
> be very little documentation around the net for doing this.
Aaron, most of what makes daemons special is they automatically detach
from their controlling terminal, setup
* Aaron Brashears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010118 22:27]:
> I'm researching writing a daemon in Java. Surprisingly, there seems to
> be very little documentation around the net for doing this.
Aaron, most of what makes daemons special is they automatically detach
from their controlling terminal, setu
* Egon Willighagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010115 11:12]:
> W: jmol: executable-not-elf-or-script ./usr/share/java/vecmath1.1-1.12.jar
> W: jmol: executable-not-elf-or-script ./usr/share/java/junit.jar
> W: jmol: executable-not-elf-or-script ./usr/share/java/aelfred.jar
> W: jmol: executable-not-elf-o
* Egon Willighagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010115 11:12]:
> W: jmol: executable-not-elf-or-script ./usr/share/java/vecmath1.1-1.12.jar
> W: jmol: executable-not-elf-or-script ./usr/share/java/junit.jar
> W: jmol: executable-not-elf-or-script ./usr/share/java/aelfred.jar
> W: jmol: executable-not-elf-
* Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001216 16:16]:
> > If I am not mistaken to precedence, the use precedes policy. Email the
> > maintainers, and ask them to include the Provides: line. :)
>
> You are mistaken.
> /usr/share/doc/debian-policy/virtual-package-names-list.text.gz says:
>
>
> <-- sni
* Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001216 16:16]:
> > If I am not mistaken to precedence, the use precedes policy. Email the
> > maintainers, and ask them to include the Provides: line. :)
>
> You are mistaken.
> /usr/share/doc/debian-policy/virtual-package-names-list.text.gz says:
>
>
> <-- sn
* Nic Ferrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001216 09:59]:
> >>> Thom May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 16-Dec-00 3:28:18 PM >>>
> >So, in the control file i'd like to be able to specify "requires:
> >java-servlet-engine" and let apt get on with it, rather than
> >saying "requires: apache-jserv|tomcat" etc.
>
> Ther
* Nic Ferrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001216 09:59]:
> >>> Thom May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 16-Dec-00 3:28:18 PM >>>
> >So, in the control file i'd like to be able to specify "requires:
> >java-servlet-engine" and let apt get on with it, rather than
> >saying "requires: apache-jserv|tomcat" etc.
>
> The
I suggest installing the libstdc++2.10 package, and perhaps the
libstdc++-2.10-dev package, if you want to compile anything against it.
(not real likely.)
* Yuan An <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001212 16:50]:
> Hi,
> I downloaded j2sdk-1_3_0-linux.bin from Sun and insall jdk1.3 in
> /usr/local/jdk1.3 i
I suggest installing the libstdc++2.10 package, and perhaps the
libstdc++-2.10-dev package, if you want to compile anything against it.
(not real likely.)
* Yuan An <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001212 16:50]:
> Hi,
> I downloaded j2sdk-1_3_0-linux.bin from Sun and insall jdk1.3 in
> /usr/local/jdk1.3
* Joe Emenaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001108 14:04]:
> > Ah, wouldn't that be nice. If every package maintained compatibility
> > release to release, we could do that. But that doesn't always happen.
> > For example, Kawa's package hierarchy is going through some
> > reorganization, such that if I
* Joe Emenaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001108 14:04]:
> > Ah, wouldn't that be nice. If every package maintained compatibility
> > release to release, we could do that. But that doesn't always happen.
> > For example, Kawa's package hierarchy is going through some
> > reorganization, such that if I
* Przemyslaw Wegrzyn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001106 09:23]:
> Well, I thought _native_ threads are implemented as threads ;), not
> processes. Isn't it less effective this way ? Forking is time-expensive...
With copy-on-write pages, I don't think forking is all that expensive.
(Corrections welcomed!
* Przemyslaw Wegrzyn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001106 09:23]:
> Well, I thought _native_ threads are implemented as threads ;), not
> processes. Isn't it less effective this way ? Forking is time-expensive...
With copy-on-write pages, I don't think forking is all that expensive.
(Corrections welcomed
* Juergen Kreileder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001104 22:13]:
> Seth> ***23**
> It's a bug. I'll fix it for the next version.
Great! :) What service! :)
> When I try to run any DRI or DGA stuff on my G400, my machine enters a
> more or less u
Hey, does anyone know where these messages are coming from?
***23**
They show up when I run java3d programs. I think each rendered frame gets
one of these lines. I am using Blackdown's Java3D port, with xf86
4.0.1-1, and GLX works.
Any sugge
* Juergen Kreileder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001104 22:13]:
> Seth> ***23**
> It's a bug. I'll fix it for the next version.
Great! :) What service! :)
> When I try to run any DRI or DGA stuff on my G400, my machine enters a
> more or less
Hey, does anyone know where these messages are coming from?
***23**
They show up when I run java3d programs. I think each rendered frame gets
one of these lines. I am using Blackdown's Java3D port, with xf86
4.0.1-1, and GLX works.
Any sugg
* Aaron Brashears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001101 23:46]:
> org.apache.xerces.validators.datatype.InvalidDatatypeFacetException:
> [exception was kaffe.util.SupportDisabled: GNU gmp was not found by Kaffe
> configure script]
>
I haven't used Kaffe in a year or so. That won't stop me from guessing!
* Aaron Brashears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001101 23:46]:
> org.apache.xerces.validators.datatype.InvalidDatatypeFacetException: [exception was
>kaffe.util.SupportDisabled: GNU gmp was not found by Kaffe configure script]
>
I haven't used Kaffe in a year or so. That won't stop me from guessing! :)
Thank you for wrapping at 7x characters! So much nicer. :)
* Alan KF LAU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001031 20:18]:
> I found that java binaries are symlink to /etc/alternatives/*.
> Is that a single command I could change the 'alternatives' like
> I do in update-alternatives for X?
Well, that would b
Lau, your emails would be easier to read if you wrapped at 72 characters
or so.
* Alan KF LAU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001031 19:45]:
> How may I install the jdk1.3 in Debian without deb packages? Is there any
> symbolic links and library I should place in right place so that dependencies
> like coc
Thank you for wrapping at 7x characters! So much nicer. :)
* Alan KF LAU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001031 20:18]:
> I found that java binaries are symlink to /etc/alternatives/*.
> Is that a single command I could change the 'alternatives' like
> I do in update-alternatives for X?
Well, that would
Lau, your emails would be easier to read if you wrapped at 72 characters
or so.
* Alan KF LAU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001031 19:45]:
> How may I install the jdk1.3 in Debian without deb packages? Is there any symbolic
>links and library I should place in right place so that dependencies like cocoon
[Joe, a 72-column word-wrap would make reading your email significantly
easier I have word-wrapped it in order to make my response at all
intellegible...]
* Joe Emenaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001019 01:34]:
> As things stand now, I either have to keep them on separate machines
> or wrestle with
[Joe, a 72-column word-wrap would make reading your email significantly
easier I have word-wrapped it in order to make my response at all
intellegible...]
* Joe Emenaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001019 01:34]:
> As things stand now, I either have to keep them on separate machines
> or wrestle wit
I can't promise I am correct, but check Sun Microsystems; they are big
fans of Java.
Also try IBM, they have been trying to provide good software at good
prices lately.
* Alan KF LAU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001003 01:33]:
> Thank you for the recommendation. However, my company wouldn't be interested
I can't promise I am correct, but check Sun Microsystems; they are big
fans of Java.
Also try IBM, they have been trying to provide good software at good
prices lately.
* Alan KF LAU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001003 01:33]:
> Thank you for the recommendation. However, my company wouldn't be intereste
68 matches
Mail list logo
