6, that might be relevant.
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Jonathan Dowland
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ https://jmtd.net
⠈⠳⣄
t-hoc justification.
Except: have you any confidence that all the Java applications in Debian
actually work properly with OpenJDK 11? Red Hat still have hard dependencies
on Java 8 for much of their stuff, including Maven.
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Jonathan Dowland
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ https://jmtd.net
⠈⠳⣄
his isn't a use-case that maven-debian-helper
considers, what are the arguments "--ignore-pom", "--dest-jar" etc. actually
for?
--
Jonathan Dowland
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
output of dh_auto_install:
https://github.com/jmtd/wadc/blob/debian/debian/rules#L10
Is this expected behaviour, or a bug (bugs) in maven-debian-helper, or
pilot error?
Thanks,
--
Jonathan Dowland
Not presently subscribed to the list, M-F-T set accordingly
signature.asc
Descriptio
Hi folks,
I'm packaging a Java application[1] that requires Java 8. It seems at the
moment this is not possible in a policy-compliant way as javahelper can't yet
generate appropriate ${java:Depends} for 1.8 yet. (IIRC)
I guess it's no problem as I can hard-code openjdk-8-* until javahelper is
upd
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 02:39:52AM +0100, Daniel Bonniot wrote:
>
> It would only be nice to move the manpage, so that bug 208025 can also
> be closed.
>
> Daniel
Am I missing something, or will applying the trivial patch for the
90-odd day old RC bug really not take more than 5 minutes? I for
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 01:32:05PM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> I'm working on 'charva' package (#203187) and it has a shared library
Where I come from (north-east england); 'charva' is slang for
trouble-making youths who wear lots of sports gear, set fire to things
and generally have no futur
7 matches
Mail list logo
