On Wed, 2004-03-10 at 11:39, elijah wright wrote:
>
> i'm pretty sure someone already built jboss packages - i seem to have an
> apt-get source for them already, at least
I packaged an old version of jboss (3.0.2 or something)[1] and had
intentions of doing 3.1+. I found it quite a bit of wo
On Thu, 2003-11-06 at 23:18, Bear Giles wrote:
> I've run into some problems recompiling libxdoclet-java, so I
> don't have a time frame for it.
>
> Anyway, since my packages haven't been redistributed I haven't
> been worried about using the Sun packages when convenient. These
> have been co
On Tue, 2003-10-28 at 05:52, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 11:34:55 +0100
> Mariano García <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> Hi,
> > Someone could tell me where I can find an apt source in order to install
> > j2ee support on my debian machine? I am using blackdown extra off
On Thu, 2003-05-15 at 13:58, Keegan Quinn wrote:
> None is currently available. Just follow the normal instructions to install
> in a local directory.
Yeah, unless you want to build .debs yourself, you should just do a
local install.
> > Also, what are my alternatives for the application serve
On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 12:09, Alexander Kotelnikov wrote:
> 4. What about J2EE?
AFAIK, "J2EE" is fairly broad. What part of J2EE are you after?
If you're looking for an application server, find my primordial JBOSS
debs at my company site[1]. Feel free to try them out and give me
comments. I ha
On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 12:09, Alexander Kotelnikov wrote:
> 4. What about J2EE?
AFAIK, "J2EE" is fairly broad. What part of J2EE are you after?
If you're looking for an application server, find my primordial JBOSS
debs at my company site[1]. Feel free to try them out and give me
comments. I ha
>
> I tried to find the jboss packages at innovationsw.com that Joe Phillips
> has made, but couldn't find them on the site. I have the j2sdk1.4
> installed from blackdown.
>
> What would be the preferred way to install JBoss for a Debian user
> especially regarding fut
>
> I tried to find the jboss packages at innovationsw.com that Joe Phillips
> has made, but couldn't find them on the site. I have the j2sdk1.4
> installed from blackdown.
>
> What would be the preferred way to install JBoss for a Debian user
> especially regarding fut
On Mon, 2003-01-20 at 14:44, Adam Heath wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Jan 2003, Greg Wilkins wrote:
>
> > + The setting of JAVA_HOME should be done by an auto search and/or
> > a debconf dialog.
>
> Use /etc/defaults/jboss, and if not set, have it look at standard locations
> that java debs(from blac
On Mon, 2003-01-20 at 14:48, Adam Heath wrote:
> On 20 Jan 2003, Joe Phillips wrote:
> > Are you saying that the non-tomcat binary releases are
> > configured for jetty? If so, I was not aware of that. I
> > figured they were jboss without any web containers. I'll
On Mon, 2003-01-20 at 14:44, Adam Heath wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Jan 2003, Greg Wilkins wrote:
>
> > + The setting of JAVA_HOME should be done by an auto search and/or
> > a debconf dialog.
>
> Use /etc/defaults/jboss, and if not set, have it look at standard locations
> that java debs(from blac
On Mon, 2003-01-20 at 14:48, Adam Heath wrote:
> On 20 Jan 2003, Joe Phillips wrote:
> > Are you saying that the non-tomcat binary releases are
> > configured for jetty? If so, I was not aware of that. I
> > figured they were jboss without any web containers. I'll
On Mon, 2003-01-20 at 05:00, Greg Wilkins wrote:
>
> Your jboss debs for 3.0.2-2 deployed without problems on my
> debian sid system. Good work!
Great! thanks.
> + Does it really need to depend on your jdk1.4 package?
> Jboss can run on 1.3 and most debian users will have already
> i
On Mon, 2003-01-20 at 05:00, Greg Wilkins wrote:
>
> Your jboss debs for 3.0.2-2 deployed without problems on my
> debian sid system. Good work!
Great! thanks.
> + Does it really need to depend on your jdk1.4 package?
> Jboss can run on 1.3 and most debian users will have already
> i
On Sun, 2003-01-19 at 01:42, Adam Heath wrote:
> On 10 Jan 2003, Joe Phillips wrote:
>
> > how's very soon?
> >
> > you can find my packages for 3.0.2 + tomcat at
> > http://debian.innovationsw.com/
> >
> > I have plans for 3.2 next.
>
> I ha
On Fri, 2003-01-17 at 22:28, Andrew Savory wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, Joe Phillips wrote:
>
> > I spent yesterday rebuilding and testing my debs. The versions
> > currently on my company site[1] have been tested to properly start/stop
> > the server without exception
On Sun, 2003-01-19 at 01:42, Adam Heath wrote:
> On 10 Jan 2003, Joe Phillips wrote:
>
> > how's very soon?
> >
> > you can find my packages for 3.0.2 + tomcat at
> > http://debian.innovationsw.com/
> >
> > I have plans for 3.2 next.
>
> I ha
On Fri, 2003-01-17 at 22:28, Andrew Savory wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, Joe Phillips wrote:
>
> > I spent yesterday rebuilding and testing my debs. The versions
> > currently on my company site[1] have been tested to properly start/stop
> > the server without exception
All,
I'd like to note that besides JBOSS packages, we also have XDoclet
packages in our archive[1]. I welcome feedback on any packages we have
in our archive.
enjoy!
-joe
[1] http://debian.innovationsw.com/
--
Innovation Software Group, LLC - http://www.innovationsw.com/
B
All,
I'd like to note that besides JBOSS packages, we also have XDoclet
packages in our archive[1]. I welcome feedback on any packages we have
in our archive.
enjoy!
-joe
[1] http://debian.innovationsw.com/
--
Innovation Software Group, LLC - http://www.innovationsw.com/
B
All,
After my last email regarding my new JBOSS debs, I found some
showstopper bugs within the package (ie. they didn't work).
I spent yesterday rebuilding and testing my debs. The versions
currently on my company site[1] have been tested to properly start/stop
the server without exceptions.
Th
On Sat, 2003-01-11 at 07:55, Greg Wilkins wrote:
> I'm the main developer of the Jetty HTTPServer and Servlet
> container and a core developer on JBoss.
>
> Just a reminder (as I've emailed Joe before) that I'm more than
> happy to:
I haven't forgotten. Thanks for the group reminder though. I'
All,
After my last email regarding my new JBOSS debs, I found some
showstopper bugs within the package (ie. they didn't work).
I spent yesterday rebuilding and testing my debs. The versions
currently on my company site[1] have been tested to properly start/stop
the server without exceptions.
Th
On Sat, 2003-01-11 at 07:55, Greg Wilkins wrote:
> I'm the main developer of the Jetty HTTPServer and Servlet
> container and a core developer on JBoss.
>
> Just a reminder (as I've emailed Joe before) that I'm more than
> happy to:
I haven't forgotten. Thanks for the group reminder though. I'
On Sat, 2003-01-11 at 10:07, Greg Wilkins wrote:
>
> It is really jasper (the JSP engine from jakarta) that needs
> tools.jar. Tomcat is just one of several servlet containers to
> use jasper.
Right, tomcat was my example. I understand there are other systems that
rely on the java compiler (ant
On Sat, 2003-01-11 at 10:07, Greg Wilkins wrote:
>
> It is really jasper (the JSP engine from jakarta) that needs
> tools.jar. Tomcat is just one of several servlet containers to
> use jasper.
Right, tomcat was my example. I understand there are other systems that
rely on the java compiler (ant
On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 20:30, Pieter Laeremans wrote:
> so it looks like a rather important file.
>
> Maybe one might place a tools.jar in /usr/share/java
that's basically what I'm proposing we add to the java policy, put an
alternatives-managed tools.jar into /usr/share/java/.
-joe
--
On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 19:36, Ben Burton wrote:
> Can't say much about the tools.jar issue; I don't know what it provides and
> how standardised that is.
I haven't delved too deeply into the bowels of JBOSS/Tomcat *yet* but as
I understand it, it contains the java compiler.
Here's my understandi
On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 18:14, Andrew Pimlott wrote:
> Oooh--I'll answer this!
>
> On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 05:03:32PM -0500, Joe Phillips wrote:
> > I've seen package after package (mine included) depend on a
> > JAVA_HOME environment variable set somewhere, in some
On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 20:30, Pieter Laeremans wrote:
> so it looks like a rather important file.
>
> Maybe one might place a tools.jar in /usr/share/java
that's basically what I'm proposing we add to the java policy, put an
alternatives-managed tools.jar into /usr/share/java/.
-joe
--
On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 19:36, Ben Burton wrote:
> Can't say much about the tools.jar issue; I don't know what it provides and
> how standardised that is.
I haven't delved too deeply into the bowels of JBOSS/Tomcat *yet* but as
I understand it, it contains the java compiler.
Here's my understandi
On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 18:14, Andrew Pimlott wrote:
> Oooh--I'll answer this!
>
> On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 05:03:32PM -0500, Joe Phillips wrote:
> > I've seen package after package (mine included) depend on a
> > JAVA_HOME environment variable set somewhere, in some
On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 13:37, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
> On 2003.01.10 12:00 Joe Phillips wrote:
> > how's very soon?
>
> Too slow for me. I need it yesterday. :)
I had it yesterday but you didn't ask. 8)
> > you can find my packages for 3.0.2 + tomcat at
>
On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 13:37, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
> On 2003.01.10 12:00 Joe Phillips wrote:
> > how's very soon?
>
> Too slow for me. I need it yesterday. :)
I had it yesterday but you didn't ask. 8)
> > you can find my packages for 3.0.2 + tomcat at
>
how's very soon?
you can find my packages for 3.0.2 + tomcat at
http://debian.innovationsw.com/
I have plans for 3.2 next.
-joe
On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 11:18, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
> Is there any timeline for bringing JBoss over to Debian?
--
Innovation Software Group, LLC - http://www.i
how's very soon?
you can find my packages for 3.0.2 + tomcat at
http://debian.innovationsw.com/
I have plans for 3.2 next.
-joe
On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 11:18, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
> Is there any timeline for bringing JBoss over to Debian?
--
Innovation Software Group, LLC - http://www.i
Recently, I've been building JBOSS/Tomcat packages for internal use and
eventual general release (I'll follow-up with another email for the
location of my working packages).
In doing so, I've had the need to build/back-port various other Java
packages to Debian stable. As I've done this, I've see
On Tue, 2002-12-31 at 17:53, T. Alexander Popiel wrote:
> Thus, the API is in the end-user docs, not just the developer docs.
> I suppose that one could argue that anyone trying to use ant for
> their own programs (instead of just using it as an incidental tool
> for building someone else's progra
Recently, I've been building JBOSS/Tomcat packages for internal use and
eventual general release (I'll follow-up with another email for the
location of my working packages).
In doing so, I've had the need to build/back-port various other Java
packages to Debian stable. As I've done this, I've see
On Tue, 2002-12-31 at 17:53, T. Alexander Popiel wrote:
> Thus, the API is in the end-user docs, not just the developer docs.
> I suppose that one could argue that anyone trying to use ant for
> their own programs (instead of just using it as an incidental tool
> for building someone else's progra
I don't know about Adam, but I am working on some as I write this.
Yesterday, I finished a JBOSS 3.0.2+Tomcat 4.0.4 set of debs. There are
some minor issues I plan to solve today or this weekend.
I'm also working on building an apt-get-able archive for the interested
folk. Once those debs are s
I don't know about Adam, but I am working on some as I write this.
Yesterday, I finished a JBOSS 3.0.2+Tomcat 4.0.4 set of debs. There are
some minor issues I plan to solve today or this weekend.
I'm also working on building an apt-get-able archive for the interested
folk. Once those debs are s
Yesterday I filed an ITP bug (#171497). Today, I have XDoclet source
and binary packages.
I am attempting to get in the queue for New Maintainership. I haven't
put in my application yet as I am trying to track down a developer to
sign my GPG key. I will submit these packages to the archive once
Yesterday I filed an ITP bug (#171497). Today, I have XDoclet source
and binary packages.
I am attempting to get in the queue for New Maintainership. I haven't
put in my application yet as I am trying to track down a developer to
sign my GPG key. I will submit these packages to the archive once
On Sat, 2002-11-02 at 07:43, Mario Joussen wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 12:07:53PM -0500, Joe Phillips wrote:
> > I chose to package 2.0 (as opposed to 2.1) as it is documented to work
> > with Java CommAPI. I have successfully used my package with some
> > CommAPI softw
On Sat, 2002-11-02 at 07:43, Mario Joussen wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 12:07:53PM -0500, Joe Phillips wrote:
> > I chose to package 2.0 (as opposed to 2.1) as it is documented to work
> > with Java CommAPI. I have successfully used my package with some
> > CommAPI softw
On Wed, 2002-10-23 at 02:27, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> Hi
>
> I want people to second this wishlist so I can add it.
I second the idea of standardizing *where* JNI libraries go and
providing support (eg. wrappers) so JVM owners can add that location to
paths. Where exactly JNI libraries should go i
Mario,
I've packaged the latest 2.0 series rxtx software for debian stable.
The package passes lintian. You can find my binary and source packages
at http://www.innovationsw.com/~jaiger/downloads/debian/
The only issues I see with the package, relative to your 1.5preX
package, is that it may be
On Wed, 2002-10-23 at 02:27, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> Hi
>
> I want people to second this wishlist so I can add it.
I second the idea of standardizing *where* JNI libraries go and
providing support (eg. wrappers) so JVM owners can add that location to
paths. Where exactly JNI libraries should go i
Mario,
I've packaged the latest 2.0 series rxtx software for debian stable.
The package passes lintian. You can find my binary and source packages
at http://www.innovationsw.com/~jaiger/downloads/debian/
The only issues I see with the package, relative to your 1.5preX
package, is that it may be
On Thu, 2002-09-26 at 11:55, Maurizio Boriani wrote:
> > "Arnaud" == Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Arnaud> There was a discussion about JBoss and Adam Heath made
> Arnaud> some packages. You can follow the discussion here:
>
> Thanks for links I found them useful but
On Thu, 2002-09-26 at 11:55, Maurizio Boriani wrote:
> > "Arnaud" == Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Arnaud> There was a discussion about JBoss and Adam Heath made
> Arnaud> some packages. You can follow the discussion here:
>
> Thanks for links I found them useful but
On Thu, 2002-09-12 at 17:24, Grzegorz Prokopski wrote:
> However as gcj-compiled programs are no longer java (IMO) - it
> woulnd't harm if we delegate separate -gcj suffix for such
> packages.
The way I see it, the -gcj tag is useless and crufty. Why do I care
that it's a gcj program versus a gcc
On Thu, 2002-09-12 at 17:24, Grzegorz Prokopski wrote:
> However as gcj-compiled programs are no longer java (IMO) - it
> woulnd't harm if we delegate separate -gcj suffix for such
> packages.
The way I see it, the -gcj tag is useless and crufty. Why do I care
that it's a gcj program versus a gc
On Thu, 2002-09-12 at 10:35, Ben Burton wrote:
> So I guess my stance is then to either:
> - - use a single package named libfoo-java with both the java classes and the
> C
> library, or:
> - - use two packages, these being libfoo-java containing the java classes and
> libfoo-jni containing the
Appropriate timing for me. I was planning on packaging portions of OCF,
which will include some JNI libraries.
On Thu, 2002-09-12 at 09:12, Ben Burton wrote:
> > Well. It is mostly because to help the build daemons. Many java packages
> > (especially in the contrib section) depend on non-package
On Thu, 2002-09-12 at 10:35, Ben Burton wrote:
> So I guess my stance is then to either:
> - - use a single package named libfoo-java with both the java classes and the C
> library, or:
> - - use two packages, these being libfoo-java containing the java classes and
> libfoo-jni containing the C
Appropriate timing for me. I was planning on packaging portions of OCF,
which will include some JNI libraries.
On Thu, 2002-09-12 at 09:12, Ben Burton wrote:
> > Well. It is mostly because to help the build daemons. Many java packages
> > (especially in the contrib section) depend on non-packag
On Sat, 2002-06-29 at 17:37, Jim White wrote:
> Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > Jim Pick wrote:
> >
> >>Here's a little project for somebody.
> >>...
> >>I don't have time to look at it, but it would be nice to know if Kaffe
> >>could be used instead...
>
> Well, I assume you mean "little" in jest.
>
On Sat, 2002-06-29 at 17:37, Jim White wrote:
> Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > Jim Pick wrote:
> >
> >>Here's a little project for somebody.
> >>...
> >>I don't have time to look at it, but it would be nice to know if Kaffe
> >>could be used instead...
>
> Well, I assume you mean "little" in jest.
>
60 matches
Mail list logo
