Curiously, what does this accomplish?
If you want to make Debian packages for these features, having a nice
build environment to do so before you upload to the archive is one
thing... but what's hte point of converting upstream stuff to .debs? It
adds nothing.
What we really need is for the Eclip
us using libtomcat5-java
> to
> make the help system work.
>
> Thanks for testing this.
>
>
>
> Greetings,
> Michael
> --
> Escape the Java Trap with GNU Classpath!
> http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html
>
> Join the community at http://planet.classpath.org/
>
>
--
Jerry Haltom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Already packaged and available in Ubuntu. Michael Koch is handling the
Debian version of it. If you'd like to get the Ubuntu version (which I
am in charge of) then you can grab it from the pool on
http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu
I am unsure where Michael has the Debian version nor when he plan
lass in it that requires an RMIC generator. I have
not been able to find a single piece of software that actually uses this
class. ;)
Happy Hacking
--
Jerry Haltom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Attached to this message is the actual patch. =/
On Sat, 2005-05-07 at 23:41 -0500, Jerry Haltom wrote:
> In the 30 minutes I had to work on free software this week I put
> together this patch against java-common which implements the previously
> discussed new VM selection idea fo
because I suck
at sh scripting and don't know any better. =(
Right now I have named the
include /usr/share/java-common/java-common.sh. THis is arbitrary and
could probably use some discussion on what we shoudl actually name this.
The same goes for the functions inside it.
--
Jerry Haltom &l
chael Koch wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 04:26:19PM -0500, Jerry Haltom wrote:
> > I have no idea what Ubuntu is going to do, as I ran out of time to do
> > it. I will assuradly do what Debian does, so I'm here to influence
> > Debian's decision. ;). Either way, I think
takes teh byte[], hashes it, and looks up the native piece
using the hash.
This means the original byte[] is required, the Jar is required. Correct
me if I'm wrong.
On Sat, 2005-04-30 at 19:51 +0200, Michael Koch wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 01:15:04PM -0500, Jerry Haltom wrote:
>
> Barry Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Michael Koch wrote:
> > > | On Sat, Mar 12, 2005 at 01:13:23PM -0600, Jerry Haltom wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > |>I would like to name the secondary native packages with a -jbi prefix
> > > |&
Apr 29, 2005 at 10:42:08PM -0500, Jerry Haltom wrote:
> > > I'm not in favour of compiling on the user machine. Also, don't forget
> > > if the package is well done, only the native part will be compiled, the
> > > jars are arch-indep so they'll not be
> I'm not in favour of compiling on the user machine. Also, don't forget
> if the package is well done, only the native part will be compiled, the
> jars are arch-indep so they'll not be re-compiled by the buildd's.
How so?
GCJ needs the .jar to compile the .so. That means the jars have to be
bui
tool first. We can then later
> add the GUI as it will be just for comfortability.
>
>
> Michael
> --
> Escape the Java Trap with GNU Classpath!
> http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html
>
> Join the community at http://planet.classpath.org/
>
>
--
Jerry Haltom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Anybody interested in this at all?
On Sun, 2005-04-03 at 11:12 -0500, Jerry Haltom wrote:
> We need a standard, nice, easy to extend way for binary wrappers
> in /usr/bin and/or startup scripts to locate their VM. There are a few
> requirements that I had:
>
> 1) Whatever we d
e")"
fi
if [ -z "$jvm" ]; then
jvm="$(jvm_scan_file /etc/jvm)"
fi
echo "$jvm"
}
Then a wrapper just sources it, JAVA_HOME=`jvm_find myname`, and goes
on.
Please discuss!
--
Jerry Haltom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 08:33:47AM -0600, Jerry Haltom wrote:
> > There is no good way to make a global cache at runtime other than a SUID
> > binary, which is not happening. A per user cache is also not practical.
>
> Package installation is done as root so no SUID b
not have any impact on
> the archive space or the on disk space of users who can't benefit from
> it anyway. On the other hand, it would still offer easy access to native
> java libraries for all GIJ users who want that feature.
>
>
> Please tell me, if any of the above so
Hash: SHA1
>
> Jerry Haltom wrote:
> | I had a bright idea for our Java policy which I want to discuss:
> | installing all javadoc in a centralized location and linking it
> | together.
> [...]
> Jerry,
> ~I believe we can link to dependent APIs without using a c
her.
Any comments? DISCUSS!
--
Jerry Haltom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
riptive at all.
Of course, all of this requires buy-in from every Debian Java
maintainer. Please respond with questions and/or comments!
--
Jerry Haltom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Disregard this. I accidentally hit send. I am still finishing it. =(
On Sat, 2005-03-12 at 13:04 -0600, Jerry Haltom wrote:
> Attention Java Maintainers: This Effects You
>
>
> This is a recap of an ad-hoc discussion a number of Java maintainers had
> a few minutes ago
d one
--
Jerry Haltom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I. Choosing A Packaging Approach
What's wrong with the current one until upstream release proper source
drops? I would rather build off of a supported upstream drop instead of
CVS checkouts.
>
> ~The SWT libraries and the Eclipse platform itself need to be
> packaged in such a way that app
emoving directory /eyagilinux-repo/pbuilder/build//12498 and its
> subdirectories
>
>
>I have a whole log output capptured with script if anyone thinks it
>could be useful.
>
>Does anyone have any suggestions on how I can get this package to
>build ?
>
>Thank you for your time and assistance,
>
>Jamie
>
--
Jerry Haltom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
e used IBM's Java
>SDK (ported to .deb via alien from a RPM package): It worked fine.
>
>Any suggestions on which Debian package would be a good solution to
>suite my Java development needs?
>
>Thanks for feedback.
>Best regards,
>
> I.
>
>P.S.: Please note that I'
It is important to remember that this takes a LONG TIME. For the whole
of Eclipse for instance, it can take near 20 on a 2GHz machine. That
isn't counting Eclipse's dependencies, which are likely to take MUCH
longer.
On Thu, 2005-02-24 at 17:02 +0100, Daniel Bonniot wrote:
>Dan Weber wrote:
>>
er's machine?
--
Jerry Haltom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
final, it is simply to satisfy my need to experiment. =)
Jerry Haltom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
attach the log of eclipse 3 building: I can not found an error.
>
> Daniele.
--
Jerry Haltom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All of the outstanding build problems with Eclipse that were posted to the
list or sent to me were fixed with eclipse-3.0.1-0wasabi7 in
mentors.debian.net.
I have fixed the version in mentors as well.
Please give it another go. =)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
I have revamped my Eclipse 3.0 packages to build and run properly on
gcj/gij. It still runs on other VMs. When run using gij however, it run
using native libraries. It's fast. Give it a go.
I have uploaded Eclipse 3.0 to mentors.debian.net. It requires the
gcj-4.0 which is currently in experimenta
Hello! Some of you may have noticed the gcj-4.0 packages in
experimental!
I have altered my Eclipse packages which I've been working on to build
with gcj and run with gij by default. In the course of doing this, I
have noticed that it would be very helpful to get .so files provided
alongside .jar
Is this package destined for Debian? Has a free JVM been attempted?
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 17:13:23 +0100, Paolo Ariano wrote:
> Hi *
>
> i'm trying to pack a new .deb based on java software but the dpkg-build
> return me:
>
> cd source && /usr/java/jdk1.5.0_01/bin/java -classpath
> /usr/share/a
on!
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 15:35:36 -0600, Jerry Haltom wrote:
> inline
>
> On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 16:16:41 -0500, Brian Thomas Sniffen wrote:
>
>> Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> If there actually is something going wrong, I'd really like fo
inline
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 16:16:41 -0500, Brian Thomas Sniffen wrote:
> Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> If there actually is something going wrong, I'd really like for someone
>> to spell out what it is in some fashion which addresses the above points.
>
> Everything you said ther
only 5 seconds. Maybe, as a debian-specific patch we could have this
> > timeout somewhat increased? 20s?
>
> Sounds reasonable, unless anyone has serious objections?
>
> Cheers
> --
> Thomas Fogwill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
--
Jerry Haltom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mine works on Sun's and Kaffes but does not work on Sable. Since the
compiled class files work on Sun's (for me), I suspect that the compile
created class files that are up to snuff, and JNI bindings that were
standards compliant. SableVM throws a bunch of NPE's however. I suspect
it's just a probl
On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 21:46:32 -0500, Ben Konrath wrote:
>
> I looked into this briefly when the message was posted and confirmed that
> this was the case, but I haven't made any progress. If you have them
> building that would be really great.
boot.jar contains only a text file (readme.txt), I a
are however more than welcome to
beat me too it, it doesn't sounds fun. =)
On Wed, 2005-01-12 at 02:43 -0500, Grzegorz B. Prokopski wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 00:04 -0600, Jerry Haltom wrote:
> > The sources for these packages is located at:
> >
> > http://kyoto.la
Which Jars were these that were not built? I have found two for lucene, a
dozen for Ant and jsch. What I am doing for these is simply linking the
Debian versions into place before install. It results in a plugin laid
out as upstream intended, but using local copies.
Seems to work pretty well.
One
olving
Kaffe... few, but it happens. If this happens, stack traces are needed.
Please enjoy!
--
Jerry Haltom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:40 +0100, Michael Koch wrote:
> > > Am Mittwoch, 5. Januar 2005 17:29 schrieb Jerry Haltom:
> > > > Does that provide the command line "ant"? Doesn't look like it.
> > >
> > > No, but its too easy to write it yourself:
> >
> > Actually
Does that provide the command line "ant"? Doesn't look like it.
On Wed, 2005-01-05 at 06:02 +0100, Michael Koch wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 5. Januar 2005 00:20 schrieb Jerry Haltom:
> > Does anybody have anything to work with on this? It seems that it
> > may have inad
ency looks good! SwingSWT needs SWT. SWT is currently in Eclipse,
which is, as is known, not in main.
What will it take to get Eclipse 3.0 built and packaged and in main
properly?
--
Jerry Haltom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Feedback Plus, Inc.
I am unable to use the Java-Gnome glade bindings. There is suppose to be a
libglade2-jni package, just like there is a libgtk2-jni and libgnome2-jni
package. It seems in SID, libglade2-JAVA contains the JNI bindings. And in
experimental, nothing does.
Let me get this straight: You are going to take somebody else's code
without reading and consenting to the license agreement that they placed
on their code?
Read the license. If you do not consent to it, do not use the code. Period.
> Hey guys,
> I am using java-gnome for now. Their site had a nice tutorial on it and I
> Also figured since java-gnoem is GPL'ed it might be better to test my
> designing skills with it first. Once I gain some sort of familiarity with it,
> I will also try to write something with SWT.
> I was also
Does anybody remember the exact reason this isn't possible? From what I
understand from Sun's license, they do allow redistribution. IANAL so help
me out. ;)
Yes. You are right. I had forgotten that some of these combinations are
possible, and sometimes wanted.
No other solution presents itself immediately.
http://java.debian.net/index.php/LibraryManifests
Please leave comments, here or there.
I've noticed java, javac, javap, javah, jar, jarsigner, and all the
others, are separate alternatives. I was thinking (experiencing) that
this make it awfully hard to change your default VM, as you have to
change each one of these commands. You may miss one, and then, while
building something may b
Package: java-common
Version: 0.22
Severity: wishlist
In order to get Java Web Start working properly (with java-package and
everything), I think this package should contain a mime type for
application/x-java-jnlp-file. Files of this type are JNLP launch files, used to
start Java Web Start appl
If not I'm going to give it some looking over tonight.
If somebody is, or has already given it looking over, what's up? Any show
stoppers?
I'm curious if you have had any ideas about packing Eclipse up so that
the integrated feature finder can function. There is apparently a way to
alter the path that downloaded plug-ins are downloaded into. Haven't
investigated it much though.
see fit, I
wanted to immortalize the idea someplace before I forgot it, and thought
of the Wiki. If it's a stupid idea, let me know.
http://java.debian.net/index.php/EclipsePackagingIdea
Jerry Haltom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
So what's up with j2se-package and Debian?
I would really like to see this package, and it's relevant pieces in Sid.
Also, shouldn't the binary be renamed to mpkg-j2se? :) You know, like
kernel-package.
For those of you who don't know about j2se by the way:
http://z42.de/debian/
It creates Debi
Can this utility generate Debian packages of various JDKs, including
a .changes and .dsc file, suitable for upload to a private apt
repository?
If not, could it?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Changing the hard coded package names would mean one could no longer use
the program with a non-free Swing implementation such as Sun's. This
sounds like a non-starter to me.
If SwingSWT were to be repackaged to java.awt and java.swing, this would
be possible. Is that possible??? Might warrent tal
Would the Apache license be GPL compatible in that method? All of the
Jakarta Commons for example. I did not think the GPL worked in that
fashion... for example I can create and build a non-GPL application with
GCC, right?
On Sun, 2004-02-22 at 03:45, Etienne Gagnon wrote:
> Jerry Haltom wr
Curiously,
Can building these .class files built with Kaffee prevent their usage
with a non-free alternative JVM? If Kaffe is totally Java standards
compliant, then that's cool... is that the case? Will there be ANY
deficiencies in these classes by building them with Kaffee?
If so, then I can see
Anybody working on packaging this? If not I'm willing to take a shot at
it.
--
Jerry Haltom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Feedback Plus, Inc.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Only one comment inline.
On Tue, 2004-01-20 at 17:35, Stefan Gybas wrote:
> [Not CC'ing the bug since it's not related to it]
>
> Jan Schulz wrote:
>
> > Which version? The content changed quite havily with the discussion :)
>
> The original one. As I've said, I've not yet read the discussion y
bin download will workout. Usuall BD was better
> than the sun-linux version.
>
> Jan
> --
> Jan Schulz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "Wer nicht fragt, bleibt dumm."
--
Jerry Haltom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Feedback Plus, Inc.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
If you have anything in the works, and are busy, I'll be glad to take a
look at it in my free time too. If you have nothing for 3.0 yet I won't
worry about it. :)
On Thu, 2003-12-25 at 15:56, Jan Schulz wrote:
> Hello Jerry,
>
> Thursday, December 25, 2003, 8:02:08 PM, you wrote:
> > Just wonderi
/usr/local? Should it? Would it? When you use it in Eclipse,
are plugins placed in ~/eclipse? Thanks!
Jerry Haltom
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
make-j2sdk itself depends on having non-free stuff installed? I thought
it was just a little script to create a .deb from a Sun provided SDK.
On Sat, 2003-12-20 at 04:47, Jan Schulz wrote:
> Hallo Jerry,
>
> * Jerry Haltom wrote:
> >What is the chance of having mpkg-j2sdk in ma
What is the chance of having mpkg-j2sdk in main?
On Tue, 2003-12-16 at 12:32, Jan Schulz wrote:
> Hallo Marco,
>
> * Marco Bresciani wrote:
> >Can I use J2SDK on Debian?
>
> To install it 'the debian way', use j2se-package or mpkg-j2sdk:
>
> deb http://www.stud.uni-karlsruhe.de/~ude2 debian/
>
The script would be responsible for setting up JAVA_HOME. Perhaps it
could also source another script that sets up CLASSPATH in some way.
Just floating some ideas!
Thanks
--
Jerry Haltom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Feedback Plus, Inc.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The script would be responsible for setting up JAVA_HOME. Perhaps it
could also source another script that sets up CLASSPATH in some way.
Just floating some ideas!
Thanks
--
Jerry Haltom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Feedback Plus, Inc.
I had heard from the grapevine that somebody had put together some JBoss
.debs? Are these "release quality" (do they work?) Where can I get them?
How do they integrate with existing debian packages, specifially
tomcat4?
Thanks!
Jerry Haltom
Feedback Plus, Inc.
I had heard from the grapevine that somebody had put together some JBoss
.debs? Are these "release quality" (do they work?) Where can I get them?
How do they integrate with existing debian packages, specifially
tomcat4?
Thanks!
Jerry Haltom
Feedback Plus, Inc.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
Crud, totally forgot to point out im using the Blackdown 1.4.1 from
blackdown's sid source.
On Tue, 2003-06-10 at 20:39, Jerry Haltom wrote:
> I'm getting a HotSpot crash when running Eclipse (as packaged in sid),
> when trying to check in a CVS project:
>
> An unexpec
Do you all think this is an upstream problem? If so, I can submit it
there.
Seems to be while trying to just draw a progress bar. :D
Jerry Haltom
Feedback Plus, Inc.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
72 matches
Mail list logo