Re: Eclipse plugins to debian packages?

2005-09-21 Thread Jerry Haltom
Curiously, what does this accomplish? If you want to make Debian packages for these features, having a nice build environment to do so before you upload to the archive is one thing... but what's hte point of converting upstream stuff to .debs? It adds nothing. What we really need is for the Eclip

Re: New eclipse 3.1 packages uploaded

2005-08-20 Thread Jerry Haltom
us using libtomcat5-java > to > make the help system work. > > Thanks for testing this. > > > > Greetings, > Michael > -- > Escape the Java Trap with GNU Classpath! > http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html > > Join the community at http://planet.classpath.org/ > > -- Jerry Haltom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Eclipse Debian package status

2005-08-01 Thread Jerry Haltom
Already packaged and available in Ubuntu. Michael Koch is handling the Debian version of it. If you'd like to get the Ubuntu version (which I am in charge of) then you can grab it from the pool on http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu I am unsure where Michael has the Debian version nor when he plan

Eclipse Status

2005-06-05 Thread Jerry Haltom
lass in it that requires an RMIC generator. I have not been able to find a single piece of software that actually uses this class. ;) Happy Hacking -- Jerry Haltom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [patch] New VM Selection Method

2005-05-07 Thread Jerry Haltom
Attached to this message is the actual patch. =/ On Sat, 2005-05-07 at 23:41 -0500, Jerry Haltom wrote: > In the 30 minutes I had to work on free software this week I put > together this patch against java-common which implements the previously > discussed new VM selection idea fo

[patch] New VM Selection Method

2005-05-07 Thread Jerry Haltom
because I suck at sh scripting and don't know any better. =( Right now I have named the include /usr/share/java-common/java-common.sh. THis is arbitrary and could probably use some discussion on what we shoudl actually name this. The same goes for the functions inside it. -- Jerry Haltom &l

Re: GCJ Native Proposal

2005-05-03 Thread Jerry Haltom
chael Koch wrote: > On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 04:26:19PM -0500, Jerry Haltom wrote: > > I have no idea what Ubuntu is going to do, as I ran out of time to do > > it. I will assuradly do what Debian does, so I'm here to influence > > Debian's decision. ;). Either way, I think

Re: gcj4 changes : Please Comment

2005-04-30 Thread Jerry Haltom
takes teh byte[], hashes it, and looks up the native piece using the hash. This means the original byte[] is required, the Jar is required. Correct me if I'm wrong. On Sat, 2005-04-30 at 19:51 +0200, Michael Koch wrote: > On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 01:15:04PM -0500, Jerry Haltom wrote: >

Re: GCJ Native Proposal

2005-04-30 Thread Jerry Haltom
> Barry Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Michael Koch wrote: > > > | On Sat, Mar 12, 2005 at 01:13:23PM -0600, Jerry Haltom wrote: > > > [...] > > > |>I would like to name the secondary native packages with a -jbi prefix > > > |&

Re: gcj4 changes : Please Comment

2005-04-30 Thread Jerry Haltom
Apr 29, 2005 at 10:42:08PM -0500, Jerry Haltom wrote: > > > I'm not in favour of compiling on the user machine. Also, don't forget > > > if the package is well done, only the native part will be compiled, the > > > jars are arch-indep so they'll not be

Re: gcj4 changes : Please Comment

2005-04-29 Thread Jerry Haltom
> I'm not in favour of compiling on the user machine. Also, don't forget > if the package is well done, only the native part will be compiled, the > jars are arch-indep so they'll not be re-compiled by the buildd's. How so? GCJ needs the .jar to compile the .so. That means the jars have to be bui

Re: New VM Selection Method

2005-04-13 Thread Jerry Haltom
tool first. We can then later > add the GUI as it will be just for comfortability. > > > Michael > -- > Escape the Java Trap with GNU Classpath! > http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html > > Join the community at http://planet.classpath.org/ > > -- Jerry Haltom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: New VM Selection Method

2005-04-09 Thread Jerry Haltom
Anybody interested in this at all? On Sun, 2005-04-03 at 11:12 -0500, Jerry Haltom wrote: > We need a standard, nice, easy to extend way for binary wrappers > in /usr/bin and/or startup scripts to locate their VM. There are a few > requirements that I had: > > 1) Whatever we d

New VM Selection Method

2005-04-03 Thread Jerry Haltom
e")" fi if [ -z "$jvm" ]; then jvm="$(jvm_scan_file /etc/jvm)" fi echo "$jvm" } Then a wrapper just sources it, JAVA_HOME=`jvm_find myname`, and goes on. Please discuss! -- Jerry Haltom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: native java libraries

2005-03-29 Thread Jerry Haltom
wrote: > On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 08:33:47AM -0600, Jerry Haltom wrote: > > There is no good way to make a global cache at runtime other than a SUID > > binary, which is not happening. A per user cache is also not practical. > > Package installation is done as root so no SUID b

Re: native java libraries

2005-03-29 Thread Jerry Haltom
not have any impact on > the archive space or the on disk space of users who can't benefit from > it anyway. On the other hand, it would still offer easy access to native > java libraries for all GIJ users who want that feature. > > > Please tell me, if any of the above so

Re: Javadoc policy

2005-03-12 Thread Jerry Haltom
Hash: SHA1 > > Jerry Haltom wrote: > | I had a bright idea for our Java policy which I want to discuss: > | installing all javadoc in a centralized location and linking it > | together. > [...] > Jerry, > ~I believe we can link to dependent APIs without using a c

Javadoc policy

2005-03-12 Thread Jerry Haltom
her. Any comments? DISCUSS! -- Jerry Haltom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

GCJ Native Proposal

2005-03-12 Thread Jerry Haltom
riptive at all. Of course, all of this requires buy-in from every Debian Java maintainer. Please respond with questions and/or comments! -- Jerry Haltom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: GCJ Native Proposal

2005-03-12 Thread Jerry Haltom
Disregard this. I accidentally hit send. I am still finishing it. =( On Sat, 2005-03-12 at 13:04 -0600, Jerry Haltom wrote: > Attention Java Maintainers: This Effects You > > > This is a recap of an ad-hoc discussion a number of Java maintainers had > a few minutes ago

GCJ Native Proposal

2005-03-12 Thread Jerry Haltom
d one -- Jerry Haltom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Eclipse 3 packaging

2005-03-07 Thread Jerry Haltom
> I. Choosing A Packaging Approach What's wrong with the current one until upstream release proper source drops? I would rather build off of a supported upstream drop instead of CVS checkouts. > > ~The SWT libraries and the Eclipse platform itself need to be > packaged in such a way that app

Re: Problems building eclipse 3 from mentors.debian.net

2005-03-02 Thread Jerry Haltom
emoving directory /eyagilinux-repo/pbuilder/build//12498 and its > subdirectories > > >I have a whole log output capptured with script if anyone thinks it >could be useful. > >Does anyone have any suggestions on how I can get this package to >build ? > >Thank you for your time and assistance, > >Jamie > -- Jerry Haltom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Looking for the right Java solution

2005-02-26 Thread Jerry Haltom
e used IBM's Java >SDK (ported to .deb via alien from a RPM package): It worked fine. > >Any suggestions on which Debian package would be a good solution to >suite my Java development needs? > >Thanks for feedback. >Best regards, > > I. > >P.S.: Please note that I'

Re: gcj4 changes : Please Comment

2005-02-24 Thread Jerry Haltom
It is important to remember that this takes a LONG TIME. For the whole of Eclipse for instance, it can take near 20 on a 2GHz machine. That isn't counting Eclipse's dependencies, which are likely to take MUCH longer. On Thu, 2005-02-24 at 17:02 +0100, Daniel Bonniot wrote: >Dan Weber wrote: >>

Re: gcj4 changes : Please Comment

2005-02-13 Thread Jerry Haltom
er's machine? -- Jerry Haltom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

gcj4 changes : Please Comment

2005-02-13 Thread Jerry Haltom
final, it is simply to satisfy my need to experiment. =) Jerry Haltom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Eclipse 3.0 and jsch

2005-02-03 Thread Jerry Haltom
attach the log of eclipse 3 building: I can not found an error. > > Daniele. -- Jerry Haltom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Eclipse 3.0 take 2

2005-02-02 Thread Jerry Haltom
All of the outstanding build problems with Eclipse that were posted to the list or sent to me were fixed with eclipse-3.0.1-0wasabi7 in mentors.debian.net. I have fixed the version in mentors as well. Please give it another go. =) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

Eclipse 3.0 on GCJ

2005-01-29 Thread Jerry Haltom
I have revamped my Eclipse 3.0 packages to build and run properly on gcj/gij. It still runs on other VMs. When run using gij however, it run using native libraries. It's fast. Give it a go. I have uploaded Eclipse 3.0 to mentors.debian.net. It requires the gcj-4.0 which is currently in experimenta

GCJ 4.0 and native Java packages

2005-01-29 Thread Jerry Haltom
Hello! Some of you may have noticed the gcj-4.0 packages in experimental! I have altered my Eclipse packages which I've been working on to build with gcj and run with gij by default. In the course of doing this, I have noticed that it would be very helpful to get .so files provided alongside .jar

Re: javac problem compiling a new .deb

2005-01-24 Thread Jerry Haltom
Is this package destined for Debian? Has a free JVM been attempted? On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 17:13:23 +0100, Paolo Ariano wrote: > Hi * > > i'm trying to pack a new .deb based on java software but the dpkg-build > return me: > > cd source && /usr/java/jdk1.5.0_01/bin/java -classpath > /usr/share/a

Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe

2005-01-14 Thread Jerry Haltom
on! On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 15:35:36 -0600, Jerry Haltom wrote: > inline > > On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 16:16:41 -0500, Brian Thomas Sniffen wrote: > >> Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>> If there actually is something going wrong, I'd really like fo

Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe

2005-01-14 Thread Jerry Haltom
inline On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 16:16:41 -0500, Brian Thomas Sniffen wrote: > Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> If there actually is something going wrong, I'd really like for someone >> to spell out what it is in some fashion which addresses the above points. > > Everything you said ther

Re: Running Eclipse 3.0.1 packages on a few VMs

2005-01-14 Thread Jerry Haltom
only 5 seconds. Maybe, as a debian-specific patch we could have this > > timeout somewhat increased? 20s? > > Sounds reasonable, unless anyone has serious objections? > > Cheers > -- > Thomas Fogwill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- Jerry Haltom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running on Kaffe

2005-01-12 Thread Jerry Haltom
Mine works on Sun's and Kaffes but does not work on Sable. Since the compiled class files work on Sun's (for me), I suspect that the compile created class files that are up to snuff, and JNI bindings that were standards compliant. SableVM throws a bunch of NPE's however. I suspect it's just a probl

Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running on Kaffe

2005-01-12 Thread Jerry Haltom
On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 21:46:32 -0500, Ben Konrath wrote: > > I looked into this briefly when the message was posted and confirmed that > this was the case, but I haven't made any progress. If you have them > building that would be really great. boot.jar contains only a text file (readme.txt), I a

Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running on Kaffe

2005-01-12 Thread Jerry Haltom
are however more than welcome to beat me too it, it doesn't sounds fun. =) On Wed, 2005-01-12 at 02:43 -0500, Grzegorz B. Prokopski wrote: > On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 00:04 -0600, Jerry Haltom wrote: > > The sources for these packages is located at: > > > > http://kyoto.la

Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running on Kaffe

2005-01-11 Thread Jerry Haltom
Which Jars were these that were not built? I have found two for lucene, a dozen for Ant and jsch. What I am doing for these is simply linking the Debian versions into place before install. It results in a plugin laid out as upstream intended, but using local copies. Seems to work pretty well. One

Eclipse 3.0 Running on Kaffe

2005-01-10 Thread Jerry Haltom
olving Kaffe... few, but it happens. If this happens, stack traces are needed. Please enjoy! -- Jerry Haltom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Eclipse 3.0

2005-01-05 Thread Jerry Haltom
:40 +0100, Michael Koch wrote: > > > Am Mittwoch, 5. Januar 2005 17:29 schrieb Jerry Haltom: > > > > Does that provide the command line "ant"? Doesn't look like it. > > > > > > No, but its too easy to write it yourself: > > > > Actually

Re: Eclipse 3.0

2005-01-05 Thread Jerry Haltom
Does that provide the command line "ant"? Doesn't look like it. On Wed, 2005-01-05 at 06:02 +0100, Michael Koch wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 5. Januar 2005 00:20 schrieb Jerry Haltom: > > Does anybody have anything to work with on this? It seems that it > > may have inad

Eclipse 3.0

2005-01-04 Thread Jerry Haltom
ency looks good! SwingSWT needs SWT. SWT is currently in Eclipse, which is, as is known, not in main. What will it take to get Eclipse 3.0 built and packaged and in main properly? -- Jerry Haltom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Feedback Plus, Inc.

libglade2-jni

2004-10-14 Thread Jerry Haltom
I am unable to use the Java-Gnome glade bindings. There is suppose to be a libglade2-jni package, just like there is a libgtk2-jni and libgnome2-jni package. It seems in SID, libglade2-JAVA contains the JNI bindings. And in experimental, nothing does.

Re: GPL related question

2004-10-06 Thread Jerry Haltom
Let me get this straight: You are going to take somebody else's code without reading and consenting to the license agreement that they placed on their code? Read the license. If you do not consent to it, do not use the code. Period.

Re: java-gnome vs. SWT

2004-09-28 Thread Jerry Haltom
> Hey guys, > I am using java-gnome for now. Their site had a nice tutorial on it and I > Also figured since java-gnoem is GPL'ed it might be better to test my > designing skills with it first. Once I gain some sort of familiarity with it, > I will also try to write something with SWT. > I was also

Sun's JVM in non-free

2004-09-16 Thread Jerry Haltom
Does anybody remember the exact reason this isn't possible? From what I understand from Sun's license, they do allow redistribution. IANAL so help me out. ;)

Re: Java alternatives

2004-09-01 Thread Jerry Haltom
Yes. You are right. I had forgotten that some of these combinations are possible, and sometimes wanted. No other solution presents itself immediately.

Library Manifests

2004-09-01 Thread Jerry Haltom
http://java.debian.net/index.php/LibraryManifests Please leave comments, here or there.

Java alternatives

2004-08-31 Thread Jerry Haltom
I've noticed java, javac, javap, javah, jar, jarsigner, and all the others, are separate alternatives. I was thinking (experiencing) that this make it awfully hard to change your default VM, as you have to change each one of these commands. You may miss one, and then, while building something may b

Bug#269108: Java Web Start mime type registration

2004-08-30 Thread Jerry Haltom
Package: java-common Version: 0.22 Severity: wishlist In order to get Java Web Start working properly (with java-package and everything), I think this package should contain a mime type for application/x-java-jnlp-file. Files of this type are JNLP launch files, used to start Java Web Start appl

Anybody working on packaging Maven?

2004-08-24 Thread Jerry Haltom
If not I'm going to give it some looking over tonight. If somebody is, or has already given it looking over, what's up? Any show stoppers?

Re: Eclipse 3.0 packages for debian not yet ready

2004-08-03 Thread Jerry Haltom
I'm curious if you have had any ideas about packing Eclipse up so that the integrated feature finder can function. There is apparently a way to alter the path that downloaded plug-ins are downloaded into. Haven't investigated it much though.

Eclipse 3.0 Packaging Idea

2004-06-30 Thread Jerry Haltom
see fit, I wanted to immortalize the idea someplace before I forgot it, and thought of the Wiki. If it's a stupid idea, let me know. http://java.debian.net/index.php/EclipsePackagingIdea Jerry Haltom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

j2se-package status?

2004-06-23 Thread Jerry Haltom
So what's up with j2se-package and Debian? I would really like to see this package, and it's relevant pieces in Sid. Also, shouldn't the binary be renamed to mpkg-j2se? :) You know, like kernel-package. For those of you who don't know about j2se by the way: http://z42.de/debian/ It creates Debi

j2se-package

2004-04-26 Thread Jerry Haltom
Can this utility generate Debian packages of various JDKs, including a .changes and .dsc file, suitable for upload to a private apt repository? If not, could it? signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: Has anyone looked at swingswt?

2004-03-14 Thread Jerry Haltom
Changing the hard coded package names would mean one could no longer use the program with a non-free Swing implementation such as Sun's. This sounds like a non-starter to me. If SwingSWT were to be repackaged to java.awt and java.swing, this would be possible. Is that possible??? Might warrent tal

Re: eight packages could possibly go to main!

2004-02-22 Thread Jerry Haltom
Would the Apache license be GPL compatible in that method? All of the Jakarta Commons for example. I did not think the GPL worked in that fashion... for example I can create and build a non-GPL application with GCC, right? On Sun, 2004-02-22 at 03:45, Etienne Gagnon wrote: > Jerry Haltom wr

Re: eight packages could possibly go to main!

2004-02-21 Thread Jerry Haltom
Curiously, Can building these .class files built with Kaffee prevent their usage with a non-free alternative JVM? If Kaffe is totally Java standards compliant, then that's cool... is that the case? Will there be ANY deficiencies in these classes by building them with Kaffee? If so, then I can see

Tomcat 5

2004-02-10 Thread Jerry Haltom
Anybody working on packaging this? If not I'm willing to take a shot at it. -- Jerry Haltom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Feedback Plus, Inc. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: java2-runtime, was Re: Bug#227587: [PROPOSAL] Java library dependencies

2004-01-20 Thread Jerry Haltom
Only one comment inline. On Tue, 2004-01-20 at 17:35, Stefan Gybas wrote: > [Not CC'ing the bug since it's not related to it] > > Jan Schulz wrote: > > > Which version? The content changed quite havily with the discussion :) > > The original one. As I've said, I've not yet read the discussion y

Re: J2SDK question

2004-01-01 Thread Jerry Haltom
bin download will workout. Usuall BD was better > than the sun-linux version. > > Jan > -- > Jan Schulz [EMAIL PROTECTED] > "Wer nicht fragt, bleibt dumm." -- Jerry Haltom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Feedback Plus, Inc. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: Eclipse 3.0 Status

2003-12-25 Thread Jerry Haltom
If you have anything in the works, and are busy, I'll be glad to take a look at it in my free time too. If you have nothing for 3.0 yet I won't worry about it. :) On Thu, 2003-12-25 at 15:56, Jan Schulz wrote: > Hello Jerry, > > Thursday, December 25, 2003, 8:02:08 PM, you wrote: > > Just wonderi

Eclipse 3.0 Status

2003-12-25 Thread Jerry Haltom
/usr/local? Should it? Would it? When you use it in Eclipse, are plugins placed in ~/eclipse? Thanks! Jerry Haltom signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: J2SDK question

2003-12-20 Thread Jerry Haltom
make-j2sdk itself depends on having non-free stuff installed? I thought it was just a little script to create a .deb from a Sun provided SDK. On Sat, 2003-12-20 at 04:47, Jan Schulz wrote: > Hallo Jerry, > > * Jerry Haltom wrote: > >What is the chance of having mpkg-j2sdk in ma

Re: J2SDK question

2003-12-19 Thread Jerry Haltom
What is the chance of having mpkg-j2sdk in main? On Tue, 2003-12-16 at 12:32, Jan Schulz wrote: > Hallo Marco, > > * Marco Bresciani wrote: > >Can I use J2SDK on Debian? > > To install it 'the debian way', use j2se-package or mpkg-j2sdk: > > deb http://www.stud.uni-karlsruhe.de/~ude2 debian/ >

Java Environment Setup

2003-08-14 Thread Jerry Haltom
The script would be responsible for setting up JAVA_HOME. Perhaps it could also source another script that sets up CLASSPATH in some way. Just floating some ideas! Thanks -- Jerry Haltom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Feedback Plus, Inc. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Java Environment Setup

2003-08-11 Thread Jerry Haltom
The script would be responsible for setting up JAVA_HOME. Perhaps it could also source another script that sets up CLASSPATH in some way. Just floating some ideas! Thanks -- Jerry Haltom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Feedback Plus, Inc.

Jboss packages

2003-08-03 Thread Jerry Haltom
I had heard from the grapevine that somebody had put together some JBoss .debs? Are these "release quality" (do they work?) Where can I get them? How do they integrate with existing debian packages, specifially tomcat4? Thanks! Jerry Haltom Feedback Plus, Inc.

Jboss packages

2003-08-02 Thread Jerry Haltom
I had heard from the grapevine that somebody had put together some JBoss .debs? Are these "release quality" (do they work?) Where can I get them? How do they integrate with existing debian packages, specifially tomcat4? Thanks! Jerry Haltom Feedback Plus, Inc. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE

Re: Eclipse crash

2003-06-10 Thread Jerry Haltom
Crud, totally forgot to point out im using the Blackdown 1.4.1 from blackdown's sid source. On Tue, 2003-06-10 at 20:39, Jerry Haltom wrote: > I'm getting a HotSpot crash when running Eclipse (as packaged in sid), > when trying to check in a CVS project: > > An unexpec

Eclipse crash

2003-06-10 Thread Jerry Haltom
Do you all think this is an upstream problem? If so, I can submit it there. Seems to be while trying to just draw a progress bar. :D Jerry Haltom Feedback Plus, Inc. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]