I think some of upstream agrees with me. I don't think calling it bcabi was ever officially intended.
I think mjw (who is that, Mark?) recommended against both -jbi and -bcabi and for -gcj. I'm on board with that if we can get other agreement. On Tue, 2005-05-03 at 07:43 +0200, Michael Koch wrote: > On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 04:26:19PM -0500, Jerry Haltom wrote: > > I have no idea what Ubuntu is going to do, as I ran out of time to do > > it. I will assuradly do what Debian does, so I'm here to influence > > Debian's decision. ;). Either way, I think bcabi is a stupid name. Even > > spelled out it doesn't say anything "binary compatible application > > binary interface". Binary compatible with what? It doesn't say anything > > at all. Even -native would be better. > > You can curse upstream's name for it but you cant eliminate it. > > > Michael -- Jerry Haltom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
