Re: request for help: jhove

2018-06-19 Thread Jeff Breidenbach
Thank you very, very much. https://packages.debian.org/source/unstable/jhove

Re: request for help: jhove

2018-05-13 Thread Jeff Breidenbach
I've tried and can't figure out how to make this package either build at the current release, or update to latest release. This is one last desperate call for help. >jhove 1.6+dfsg-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2018-05-14 > >It is affected by these RC bugs: >895761: jhove: FTBFS with

Re: request for help: jhove

2018-04-30 Thread Jeff Breidenbach
I'd love to actually update to the most recent upstream. The build system switched from ant to maven, and I am completely unfamiliar with it. First, I got a fatal error about not finding org.sonatype.oss:oss-parent:pom, so I tried deleting that section of the pom.xml. Then the build can't find jaco

Re: request for help: jhove

2018-04-30 Thread Jeff Breidenbach
I'd love to actually update to the most recent upstream. The build system switched from ant to maven, and I am completely unfamiliar with it. First, I got a fatal error about not finding org.sonatype.oss:oss-parent:pom, so I tried deleting that section of the pom.xml. Then the build can't find jaco

request for help: jhove

2018-04-30 Thread Jeff Breidenbach
I'm the Debian package maintainer for jhove, which is an image validator and really useful for libraries and other cultural heritage institutions. It is about to get kicked out due to bug #895761. The right thing to do is update the jhove to the current upstream version. However, I haven't touched

Re: tomcat & webapps & permissions

2005-03-28 Thread Jeff Breidenbach
> ~I am inclined to say this should be left to README.Debian, since not > all people who install liblucene-java and liblucene-java-doc may want > such an intrusive demo app installed by default. That's certainly possible, we can start with the README.Debian. However, I'm thinking of tackling

tomcat & webapps & permissions

2005-03-28 Thread Jeff Breidenbach
Hi Barry & other Debian-Java folks, I was just playing with the demo web application that comes in liblucene-java-1.4.3-4. This is one of those .war things and it requires adjusting some Tomcat permissions for it to work. Is this best left to README.Debian, or should the liblucene-java package s

seeking co-maintainer for Lucene

2004-11-10 Thread Jeff Breidenbach
The Lucene package is in pretty good shape. * No non-wishlist bugs * 100% lintian clean * Reasonably packaged (self tests and everything) * Up to date with upstream * Popular according to popularity-contest * Not that complicated This would be a great package to have in main. I'm looking f

lucene 1.4 -> main

2004-07-27 Thread Jeff Breidenbach
Hi all, I've just upload lucene 1.4-2, and packaged it so it does its unit tests on build. I'd really like to get it in main in time for the sarge release - can someone please help? I'm pretty new to Debian-Java packaging and worried about not figuring this out in time. Either advice or an NMU

peer review on Debian Lucene 1.3 package

2004-06-13 Thread Jeff Breidenbach
I made an attempt to package Lucene 1.3 for Debian, to help update the existing liblucene-java package in contrib. This is my first time ever working with a Debian Java package, and I'm finding parts of it fairly confusing - especially some of the fields in the Debian control file. (Does the packa