Hi Carnil,
On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 09:38:27PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Sort of. Just for exanding the context, there is a note about it in
> https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/amd64/release-notes/ch-information.en.html#limited-security-support
thanks, I've added openjdk-17 to secu
hi,
as both openjdk-11 and openjdk-17 have received security updates and
as I understand this very bug report, we can close this bug as nothing
regarding the security-status of openjdk-(11|17) in bullseye needs to
be documented right now, as they are both supported.
Assuming this is correct, I'm
Hi Sylvain,
On Fri, Apr 01, 2022 at 12:06:40PM +0200, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
> Holger, can you clarify if you want the LTS team to handle
> debian-security-support backports to stretch, or if you intend to do it
> yourself?
thanks for asking, I'd be glad for more people maintaining
debian-securi
hi,
almost exactly a year ago...
On Sun, Feb 07, 2021 at 11:59:23AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> So I'm going with option 1, preparing for an openjdk-17 in bullseye, and
> preparing release notes and notes for security support. This is more
> conservative than option 2, but allows to do better
clone 975016 -1
tags -1 -moreinfo
retitle 975016 OpenJDK 15 support state for Bullseye
retitle -1 Python 2 support state for Bullseye
# thanks
and sorry for the noise, should have done the split immediatly :)
--
cheers,
Holger
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|
control: tags -1 +moreinfo
On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 12:20:37PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> >
> > openjdk-15Only included for bootstrapping later OpenJDK
> > releases
> >
> >
> > One important thing: These only applies to Bullseye and
>
Hi Emmanuel,
On Montag, 5. Oktober 2015, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Thank you very much for the changes. Let's see how it goes, but I
> suspect the volume of notifications will be much better and the need for
> individual subscriptions less critical.
we'll see. you are still subscribed to 1000 diffe
Hi Emmanuel,
On Dienstag, 29. September 2015, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> > I agree and am wondering if we should actually do this, and limit
> > (maintainer) notifications to unstable? What do you think?
> Well, if I understood your "this graph is a lie" properly in your talks,
> I think the reproduc
Hi,
(mostly ignoring the rest as this has been addressed already.)
On Dienstag, 29. September 2015, Markus Koschany wrote:
> I understand that everything is still in development. However I don't
> think a public mailing list is a suitable testbed. My preferred solution
> would be to make receivin
Hi,
On Dienstag, 29. September 2015, Markus Koschany wrote:
> I would like to take the opportunity to raise the following concern. I
> support the reproducible builds effort but I think the periodic e-mails
> to pkg-java are often not useful enough at the moment. There are far too
> many false-pos
Hi,
thanks for explaining, Emmanuel!
On Dienstag, 29. September 2015, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Actually I tend to prefer the reports in unstable. The reports in
> testing are often duplicates of issues already known in unstable, and
> sometimes they are already fixed in unstable when they are noti
Hi,
On Mittwoch, 8. April 2015, Niels Thykier wrote:
> * There are several jenkins-* packages that will (presumably) need to
>be updated as often as Jenkins itself.
I wondered which packages were "jenkins*" and figured it out with the help
from Adam:
holger@coccia:~$ dak rm -Rn jenkins
Wil
Hi,
On Mittwoch, 17. Oktober 2012, Thomas Koch wrote:
> Holger already had a look at prolog-cafe in August. I finally added an
> explanation to README.source about the issue he found (below). You might
> ask him whether he wants to hand over the sponsoring of prolog-cafe.
I absolutly don't mind i
Hi,
On Sonntag, 24. Juni 2012, Thomas Koch wrote:
> Prolog-Cafe is a dependency for the Code Review System Gerrit, RFP:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=589436
>
> Prolog-Cafe itself:
>
> http://mentors.debian.net/package/prolog-cafe
> or
> http://anonscm.debian.org/git
14 matches
Mail list logo