hi, almost exactly a year ago...
On Sun, Feb 07, 2021 at 11:59:23AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> So I'm going with option 1, preparing for an openjdk-17 in bullseye, and
> preparing release notes and notes for security support. This is more
> conservative than option 2, but allows to do better than the commitment made.
>
> The option also has the advantage that approval is only needed by the security
> team. openjdk-17 already is in testing. granting unblock requests for new
> snapshot builds by the release team would be appreciated, but isn't strictly
> necessary as long as we can build newer snapshots. And that can be checked in
> unstable.
so, as I see it, openjdk-17 is in bullseye and now I'm wondering what
I should do with #975016 titled "OpenJDK 17 support state for Bullseye"
and filed against src:debian-security-support, as openjdk-17 seems to be
supported and src:debian-security-support's purpose is to documented what's
unsupported.
so, should I just close this bug?
--
cheers,
Holger
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AAA1C
⠈⠳⣄
A ship is always safe at shore, but that is not what it's built for.
(Albert Einstein)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
