Achim Derigs wrote:
On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 05:54:48PM +0200, Thomas Jachmann wrote:
Hi,
I've got an Apache->Tomcat->Jboss setup on a Debian woody production box
(Sun JVM 1.4.2_01). Three weeks ago, Tomcat stopped working printing an
exception stating that there are too many open files. After res
n.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=219102
been around for 212 days...
-g
Marcus
On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 23:37, Glen Mehn wrote:
Marcus Crafter wrote:
Hi Matt,
Thanks for the tip - nothing there, but I've filed a bug with the strace
information. Hopefully we'll be able to get this one fixed up soon.
Marcus Crafter wrote:
Hi Matt,
Thanks for the tip - nothing there, but I've filed a bug with the strace
information. Hopefully we'll be able to get this one fixed up soon.
do you have libc6-i686 installed?
http://packages.debian.org/unstable/libs/libc6-i686.html
"WARNING: Some commercial program
juanca wrote:
hi, everyone
I´m having problems trying to get jvm to work I don´t know what to
install, I fellow workers need that the port 5001 is open
Thanks in advance
what is the error you're getting?
Copy and paste the output of:
$ java -version
here
regards,
glen
--
Glen Mehn [
Greg Wilkins wrote:
So hopefully the tools.jar dependancy will soon be history.
Thus anything done to support it in the short term should clearly
be of a temporary nature.
well, if it's only temporary and we know it won't re-surface, there's no
need to add it to policy.
I think Andrew Pimlott's
Greg Wilkins wrote:
So hopefully the tools.jar dependancy will soon be history.
Thus anything done to support it in the short term should clearly
be of a temporary nature.
well, if it's only temporary and we know it won't re-surface, there's no
need to add it to policy.
I think Andrew Pim
Hendrik Sattler wrote:
PS: I looked at the rpm from Sun and I do not think that the creators knew
where files should be installed...
try using the .bin version-- it's a self-extracting executable that you
can intsall anywhere
Hendrik Sattler wrote:
PS: I looked at the rpm from Sun and I do not think that the creators knew
where files should be installed...
try using the .bin version-- it's a self-extracting executable that you
can intsall anywhere
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Rupa Schomaker wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Just an FYI:
Blackdown and Sun's 1.3.1 don't play well with libc 2.3.x.
IBM's 1.3.1 does seem to work fine (at least so far). I've build an
ibm .deb using alien plus some pre/postrm to update alternatives. My
deb is no where near distributa
Rupa Schomaker wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Just an FYI:
Blackdown and Sun's 1.3.1 don't play well with libc 2.3.x.
IBM's 1.3.1 does seem to work fine (at least so far). I've build an
ibm .deb using alien plus some pre/postrm to update alternatives. My
deb is no where near distr
Egon Willighagen wrote:
On Tuesday 12 November 2002 21:23, David Shepherd wrote:
I've just tried installing the j2sdk1.4 and j2re1.4 packages from a
blackdown mirror and got the following conflict with 1.3 which is
already installed.
Anyone else had this error and fixed it?
I don't want to remov
Egon Willighagen wrote:
On Tuesday 12 November 2002 21:23, David Shepherd wrote:
I've just tried installing the j2sdk1.4 and j2re1.4 packages from a
blackdown mirror and got the following conflict with 1.3 which is
already installed.
Anyone else had this error and fixed it?
I don't want to r
12 matches
Mail list logo
