gnificantly more bandwidth-efficient to download Packages
files for multiple architectures. Obviously this only works correctly
if descriptions are identical across architectures (which is,
fortunately, mostly true).
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org]
--
va Policy by Jan Schulz
>
> That's got time till the next debian release is out, I guess.
Not an awful lot of it (assuming the 15th March date for the base freeze
holds or doesn't slip too far).
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UN
because they are built for architectures for which kaffe is not
under your proposal.
> Better suggestions?
Fix the build problems. :) Hey, it built on those architectures in the
past, didn't it?
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
(Perhaps the default could even be
> determined by looking at the java alternative.)
That sounds like it would work better with autobuilders, too - you could
build-depend on jikes (>= foo), invoke jikes-kaffe, and expect it to
work everywhere.
--
Colin Watson
(Perhaps the default could even be
> determined by looking at the java alternative.)
That sounds like it would work better with autobuilders, too - you could
build-depend on jikes (>= foo), invoke jikes-kaffe, and expect it to
work everywhere.
--
Colin Watson
On Sun, Feb 17, 2002 at 08:57:17PM -0800, Stephen Zander wrote:
> >>>>> "Colin" == Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Colin> The last seven uploads of jikes have been NMUs. Since
> Colin> another bug (#119551) is holding up freenet-u
On Sun, Feb 17, 2002 at 08:57:17PM -0800, Stephen Zander wrote:
> >>>>> "Colin" == Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Colin> The last seven uploads of jikes have been NMUs. Since
> Colin> another bug (#119551) is holding up freenet-u
tags 123041 patch
thanks
On Sun, Feb 17, 2002 at 04:06:37AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> This is a 64-bit issue; jikes assumes that sizeof(int) == sizeof(void*),
> which isn't true on alpha or ia64. Specifically, in src/ast.h it tries
> to declare objects of type AstArray, whe
tags 123041 patch
thanks
On Sun, Feb 17, 2002 at 04:06:37AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> This is a 64-bit issue; jikes assumes that sizeof(int) == sizeof(void*),
> which isn't true on alpha or ia64. Specifically, in src/ast.h it tries
> to declare objects of type AstArray, whe
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 01:50:04PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Could software created using Java be released under the GPL?
Yes. See http://www.gnu.org/software/java/java.html.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 01:50:04PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Could software created using Java be released under the GPL?
Yes. See http://www.gnu.org/software/java/java.html.
--
Colin Watson [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EM
On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 07:12:29PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 11:43:54AM -0600, Colin Watson wrote:
> > Amid all the arguments I've lost track of exactly why
> > /usr/share/java/repository causes a problem for building things. Can
> > someb
On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 07:12:29PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 11:43:54AM -0600, Colin Watson wrote:
> > Amid all the arguments I've lost track of exactly why
> > /usr/share/java/repository causes a problem for building things. Can
> > someb
jar rather than the repository,
anyway, although I can't really see any particular benefits one way or
the other for a standalone program like this.
--
Colin Watson [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tions, because otherwise these
> packages will never make it into testing, which means jython will
> never make it into testing (which is what concerns me more).
Are you sure? I believe that testing only cares about binaries being out
of date on various architectures; if they simply aren&#
tions, because otherwise these
> packages will never make it into testing, which means jython will
> never make it into testing (which is what concerns me more).
Are you sure? I believe that testing only cares about binaries being out
of date on various architectures; if they simply aren&#
t; and there's no conflict.
>
> We're not in Kansas anymore, Toto :) The old rules don't always apply.
I got the impression that Adam was upset at least partly about the legal
issues.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
t; and there's no conflict.
>
> We're not in Kansas anymore, Toto :) The old rules don't always apply.
I got the impression that Adam was upset at least partly about the legal
issues.
--
Colin Watson [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
--
To UNSUBSCR
a option to the java-wrapper
> > to allow this, or?
>
> java --flavor
>
> I did not choose -version, as some jvms already have that. --flavor has a
> a high probability of not currently being used.
Confusing interaction with UK spelling. --variant?
--simple-version-string?
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
a option to the java-wrapper
> > to allow this, or?
>
> java --flavor
>
> I did not choose -version, as some jvms already have that. --flavor has a
> a high probability of not currently being used.
Confusing interaction with UK spelling. --variant?
--simple-version-stri
packages into non-free then ?
The dummy packages could go into contrib. This means free packages
depending on them would have to go into contrib too, but without a free
Java 2 system they'd have to anyway so that shouldn't be a problem.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gt; packages into non-free then ?
The dummy packages could go into contrib. This means free packages
depending on them would have to go into contrib too, but without a free
Java 2 system they'd have to anyway so that shouldn't be a problem.
--
Colin Watson
ons this spring that the
Blackdown folks had got explicit permission from Sun for Debian to
distribute the JDK in non-free. Somebody on -java is likely to know for
sure.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
at hosts incoming is down for maintenance, which didn't go
as planned. According to Ben, it won't be back up until some time today.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
at hosts incoming is down for maintenance, which didn't go
as planned. According to Ben, it won't be back up until some time today.
--
Colin Watson [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hat policy.
Oh, hang on. The original post said:
> * This discusses the default classpath, except the classpath that
> are needed by the jvm.
... so perhaps I've missed the point. I'll get my coat.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 11:23:35PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 02:08:03PM -0500, Colin Watson wrote:
> > I think there's got to be some kind of default classpath, even if it can
> > be overridden, otherwise programs without a startup script require th
tup script require the
user to set an environment variable before they can be used (see Debian
policy 10.9: "A program must not depend on environment variables to get
reasonable defaults").
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Maurizio Boriani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 10:09:31AM +0000, Colin Watson wrote:
>> Maurizio Boriani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> >Package: wnpp
>> >Severity: wishlist
>> >URL: ftp://ftp.progsoc.uts.edu.a
Maurizio Boriani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 10:09:31AM +0000, Colin Watson wrote:
>> Maurizio Boriani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> >Package: wnpp
>> >Severity: wishlist
>> >URL: ftp://ftp.progsoc.uts.e
30 matches
Mail list logo
