On Mon, 5 Apr 2004, Charles Fry wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I sent this to debian-mentors with no response yet, and started thinking
> maybe I should send it to debian-java instead. In any case:
>
> I have started work on packaging the Bouncy Castle Crypto libraries
> for Java (bug #234048). I think I have m
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004, Karl Trygve Kalleberg wrote:
> (i) distribute the Softwarre complete and
>unmodified and only bundled as part of your
>Programs,
>
> - I think we pass this one, except that we change the paths where the
> packages are installed.
Nope. Developer A distributes an scs
On Tue, 9 Mar 2004, Adam Heath wrote:
> components/content/lib/velocity-dep-1.3.jar
This is part of a subproject of velocity, velocity-tools.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 10 Mar 2004, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Wed, 10 Mar 2004, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> >
> >> Would be cool to have JBoss in Debian ;-)
> >
> > Don't you mean ofbiz(altho, jboss would be nice too,
I've reduced the list, to those that implement java extensions.
jdbc2_0-stdext and jta appear to be in kaffe in some form or another.
> components/minerva/lib/jdbc2_0-stdext.jar
javax.sql.*
> components/minerva/lib/jta_1.0.1.jar
javax.transaction.*
> components/minerva/lib/ots-jts_1.0.jar
o
On Wed, 10 Mar 2004, Dalibor Topic wrote:
> I don't know about the rest from the top of my head. I'm checking in
> some RMI improvements now, and then we'll give JBoss a beating. The
> developement in the last few days has been quite intensive wrt to
> getting XScale, PowerPC-no-fpu, and MIPS to r
On 10 Mar 2004, Joe Phillips wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-03-10 at 11:39, elijah wright wrote:
> >
> > i'm pretty sure someone already built jboss packages - i seem to have an
> > apt-get source for them already, at least
>
> I packaged an old version of jboss (3.0.2 or something)[1] and had
> intent
On Wed, 10 Mar 2004, elijah wright wrote:
>
> i'm pretty sure someone already built jboss packages - i seem to have an
> apt-get source for them already, at least
>
> elijah
That was me, but was based on 2.4. 3.0 changed completely around, and I never
got around to it.
Plus, we have stopped
On Wed, 10 Mar 2004, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > These are the jars I need to have packaged still.
> > Slightly smaller list, as I found some replacements in debian already.
>
> Re-ordered:
>
> 1° Maybe already in
On Tue, 9 Mar 2004, Adam Heath wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Mar 2004, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
>
> > Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > So, I sent a mail recently to this list, saying I got ofbiz(www.ofbiz.org) to
> > > run on kaffe. This is great n
On Tue, 9 Mar 2004, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > So, I sent a mail recently to this list, saying I got ofbiz(www.ofbiz.org) to
> > run on kaffe. This is great news for kaffe.
> >
> > However, I just realized something
So, I sent a mail recently to this list, saying I got ofbiz(www.ofbiz.org) to
run on kaffe. This is great news for kaffe.
However, I just realized something very poor. Kaffe is in main. Since
ofbiz(and all the external jars in it's cvs checkout) run on kaffe, it should
be able to go into main a
On Mon, 8 Mar 2004, Andy Zeneski wrote:
> > Of course, ofbiz includes lots of jars in it's tarball and checkout. I
> > haven't checked all of them(well, not any of them), to see how they
> > fit in
> > with the DFSG. Some of the jars included are there for the convience
> > of
> > end-users, and
On Sat, 6 Mar 2004, Dalibor Topic wrote:
> Hi Adam,
>
> Adam Heath wrote:
> > kaffe 1.1.4 can now run ofbiz 2.1. I haven't tried a later version of ofbiz.
>
> Thanks for the great news! Could you add the information on how to get
> it to run to the Mov
kaffe 1.1.4 can now run ofbiz 2.1. I haven't tried a later version of ofbiz.
There are some issues, however.
Startup time under sun 1.4 is 11s. kaffe, 15.2.
Kaffe complains about an invalid bytecode at startup, while sun doesn't.
WARNING Bad bytecode! Illegal exception table entry: start_pc=1
On Thu, 4 Mar 2004, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> Ean Schuessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > The only reason that my mail went to -devel was your request to remove
> > Kaffe from seven architectures without consulting me. You made that
> > request to -devel and that request required this respons
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003, Rupa Schomaker wrote:
> Mariano García <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I am installing tomcat with apache on Debian (testing). Looking for
> > information I have found that I need mod-jk apache module, and I have
> > found some references about libapache-mod-
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, Daniel Bonniot wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> There are currently two release-critical bugs and architecture problems
> that keep kaffe from reentering testing.
> The details are at http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=kaffe
Why didn't you cc the maintainer of kaffe?
--
To U
On Sat, 8 Nov 2003, Bear Giles wrote:
> The latter is one reason why I believe that ultimately the
> conventional shared library approach is flawed for Java. The
> industry, or at least the part I'm involved with, is moving
> towards self-contained WAR or EAR files that have their own copies
> of
On Thu, 6 Nov 2003, Bear Giles wrote:
> hsqldb: /usr/share/java/hsqldb.jar, documentation, and scripts to
> run the database as a service. I haven't rewritten the stock
> scripts to follow Debian standards yet -- I'm not even sure it's
> practical since the scripts must specify the directory con
On 11 Aug 2003, Michael R Head wrote:
> I actually use update-alternatives to point to
> /usr/local/lib/j2sdk/bin/java which is a symlink to j2sdk1.4.2 or
> whatever the latest I have installed is.
>
> That said, using the JAVA_HOME variable (if it is set) allow a user on
> the system to easily se
On 11 Aug 2003, Michael R Head wrote:
> I actually use update-alternatives to point to
> /usr/local/lib/j2sdk/bin/java which is a symlink to j2sdk1.4.2 or
> whatever the latest I have installed is.
>
> That said, using the JAVA_HOME variable (if it is set) allow a user on
> the system to easily se
On Mon, 28 Jul 2003, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name: libi18n-java
> Version : 0.1
> Upstream Author : Jean-Hugues de Raigniac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL or Web page : http://jhraigniac.freesurf.fr/i18n-lib/
> * License : ACME
On Mon, 28 Jul 2003, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name: charva
> Version : 1.0.1
> Upstream Author : Rob Pitman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL or Web page : http://www.pitman.co.za/projects/charva/
> * License : LGPL
> Description
On Mon, 28 Jul 2003, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name: libi18n-java
> Version : 0.1
> Upstream Author : Jean-Hugues de Raigniac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL or Web page : http://jhraigniac.freesurf.fr/i18n-lib/
> * License : ACME
On Mon, 28 Jul 2003, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name: charva
> Version : 1.0.1
> Upstream Author : Rob Pitman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL or Web page : http://www.pitman.co.za/projects/charva/
> * License : LGPL
> Description
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> Description : Ease and speed development and maintenance of validation
> rules
And?
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> Description : Extension of the java.lang package
And?
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> Description : Ease and speed development and maintenance of validation rules
And?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> Description : Extension of the java.lang package
And?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, Michael Koch wrote:
> classpath CVS and gcj-3.3 have some working parts of awt. gcj-3.4 will
> be the first version with a "working" awt implementation.
What widget set will it use?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Cont
The above file is included in sablevm1-dev, libgcj3-dev, and libgcj4-dev.
Kaffe has it at /usr/lib/kaffe/include/jni.h. gcc-snapshot has it at
/usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/include/jni.h.
In discussion with the sablevm maintainer, he maintains that jni.h is a global
file, and is not unique to each vm. H
The above file is included in sablevm1-dev, libgcj3-dev, and libgcj4-dev.
Kaffe has it at /usr/lib/kaffe/include/jni.h. gcc-snapshot has it at
/usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/include/jni.h.
In discussion with the sablevm maintainer, he maintains that jni.h is a global
file, and is not unique to each vm. H
On Sat, 10 May 2003, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Fri, May 09, 2003 at 11:30:04AM -0500, Drew Scott Daniels wrote:
> > Why is this package marked remove?
>
> Because it's been continually unreleasable.
>
> > Note bug 191866 was reported May 4th and according to
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgr
On Fri, 2 May 2003, Henning Moll wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I wonder if it is possible to install j2re1.3 without X(client). Possible?
> Should X (gsfonts-x11, xlibs) only be a Suggests?
>
> I want to use this jre (not using any awk / swing) on an X-less server.
xlibs are small. just don't install an x-se
On Sun, 30 Mar 2003, Stephen Zander wrote:
>
> Subject says it all. I just got back from vacation so it will take me
> a few days to get everything built and yes, Jack, I'll build a new
> 1.3.1 ppc package as well.
Is there a changelog available(upstream or debian)?
1.4.0.99beta-1 is buggy when
On Fri, 24 Jan 2003, Caoilte O'Connor wrote:
> I don't know a lot about this so I'm not posting a bug, but should tomcat4
> really try and shutdown after postgresql.
>
> It makes it impossible for my webapps to close their db connections cleanly
> and the process ends up getting killed.
>
> What a
On Fri, 24 Jan 2003, Caoilte O'Connor wrote:
> I don't know a lot about this so I'm not posting a bug, but should tomcat4
> really try and shutdown after postgresql.
>
> It makes it impossible for my webapps to close their db connections cleanly
> and the process ends up getting killed.
>
> What a
> > /var/lib/jboss/
> what's this for? I guess I'll find out when I poke through your
> packages (later this week).
/var/lib/jboss/deploy/, which is where deployments occur. It was g+ws jboss,
and update-jboss(a helper script) had --deploy and --undeploy cmds for users
to run as non-root.
> I think we should work to package each individually (eg. javamail) if
> possible and they fall into the above case. The jboss-contrib package
> would shrink over time. The problem with this approach is that future
> versions of jboss-contrib won't be backward compatible with earlier
> versions
> > /var/lib/jboss/
> what's this for? I guess I'll find out when I poke through your
> packages (later this week).
/var/lib/jboss/deploy/, which is where deployments occur. It was g+ws jboss,
and update-jboss(a helper script) had --deploy and --undeploy cmds for users
to run as non-root.
> I think we should work to package each individually (eg. javamail) if
> possible and they fall into the above case. The jboss-contrib package
> would shrink over time. The problem with this approach is that future
> versions of jboss-contrib won't be backward compatible with earlier
> versions
On 20 Jan 2003, Joe Phillips wrote:
> I don't know what you mean by the default deployment. jboss-tomcat is
> it's own, optional package. Note that jboss-server-all and
> jboss-server-default depend on jboss-tomcat. The deployment that my
> packages install is straight out of the binary release
On Mon, 20 Jan 2003, Greg Wilkins wrote:
> + The setting of JAVA_HOME should be done by an auto search and/or
> a debconf dialog.
Use /etc/defaults/jboss, and if not set, have it look at standard locations
that java debs(from blackdown, maybe /usr/local) contain.
> + The default webconta
On 20 Jan 2003, Joe Phillips wrote:
> I don't know what you mean by the default deployment. jboss-tomcat is
> it's own, optional package. Note that jboss-server-all and
> jboss-server-default depend on jboss-tomcat. The deployment that my
> packages install is straight out of the binary release
On Mon, 20 Jan 2003, Greg Wilkins wrote:
> + The setting of JAVA_HOME should be done by an auto search and/or
> a debconf dialog.
Use /etc/defaults/jboss, and if not set, have it look at standard locations
that java debs(from blackdown, maybe /usr/local) contain.
> + The default webconta
On 10 Jan 2003, Joe Phillips wrote:
> #2 is a bit trickier. tools.jar is needed in some cases, most notably
> servlet/jsp containers need it in order to compile JSP at runtime. My
> JBOSS packages fall into this category. tools.jar is installed
> somewhere under JAVA_HOME, JBOSS needs tools.jar
On 10 Jan 2003, Joe Phillips wrote:
> #2 is a bit trickier. tools.jar is needed in some cases, most notably
> servlet/jsp containers need it in order to compile JSP at runtime. My
> JBOSS packages fall into this category. tools.jar is installed
> somewhere under JAVA_HOME, JBOSS needs tools.jar
On 19 Jan 2003, Joe Phillips wrote:
> Yeah...I downloaded your sources at one point. Still need to read
> through your work. My packages are completely my own mess.
>
> > Unfortunately, 3.0 was a radical change, config wise, so I haven't been able
> > to make 3.0 debs yet.
>
> Well I'd be happy
On 10 Jan 2003, Joe Phillips wrote:
> how's very soon?
>
> you can find my packages for 3.0.2 + tomcat at
> http://debian.innovationsw.com/
>
> I have plans for 3.2 next.
I have jboss debs of 2.4(upto 2.4.7). All properly split. Depends on other
java debs in debian(where I can). All non-free a
On Sat, 11 Jan 2003, Greg Wilkins wrote:
> + lobby the JBoss project to make any changes that may
> assist you with your packaging (not sure of how successful
> that will be).
Good fucking luck. JBoss upstream has been resistant to any suggestions on
how they package their dependants.
On 19 Jan 2003, Joe Phillips wrote:
> Yeah...I downloaded your sources at one point. Still need to read
> through your work. My packages are completely my own mess.
>
> > Unfortunately, 3.0 was a radical change, config wise, so I haven't been able
> > to make 3.0 debs yet.
>
> Well I'd be happy
On 10 Jan 2003, Joe Phillips wrote:
> how's very soon?
>
> you can find my packages for 3.0.2 + tomcat at
> http://debian.innovationsw.com/
>
> I have plans for 3.2 next.
I have jboss debs of 2.4(upto 2.4.7). All properly split. Depends on other
java debs in debian(where I can). All non-free a
On Sat, 11 Jan 2003, Greg Wilkins wrote:
> + lobby the JBoss project to make any changes that may
> assist you with your packaging (not sure of how successful
> that will be).
Good fucking luck. JBoss upstream has been resistant to any suggestions on
how they package their dependants.
On 12 Aug 2002, Grzegorz Prokopski wrote:
> Facts that caused that I have choosen this set of tools.
> * kaffe
> It contains it's own JAVA_HOME environment, so it wouldn't make sense
> to just copy it. If you can build with kaffe - then stick with
> it and don't use free-java-sdk. However -
On 12 Aug 2002, Grzegorz Prokopski wrote:
> W li¶cie z pon, 12-08-2002, godz. 18:13, Adam Heath pisze:
> > Er, you say free, but are restricting me to only use what is listed in the
> > depends.
So, what about kaffe? What about gcj? Why are you saying that sable is
better th
On 12 Aug 2002, Grzegorz Prokopski wrote:
> Facts that caused that I have choosen this set of tools.
> * kaffe
> It contains it's own JAVA_HOME environment, so it wouldn't make sense
> to just copy it. If you can build with kaffe - then stick with
> it and don't use free-java-sdk. However -
On 12 Aug 2002, Grzegorz Prokopski wrote:
> W li¶cie z pon, 12-08-2002, godz. 18:13, Adam Heath pisze:
> > Er, you say free, but are restricting me to only use what is listed in the
> > depends.
So, what about kaffe? What about gcj? Why are you saying that sable is
better th
On 12 Jul 2002, Sobkowiak Krzysztof wrote:
> I try to install jboss, but jboss-catalina-service depends on
> lib-sax-java. There's not such a packet (i think it should be
> lib-saxon-java). Where's lib-sax-java?
Fetch it from potato. The other developers conspired against me, and had it
removed
On 12 Jul 2002, Sobkowiak Krzysztof wrote:
> I try to install jboss, but jboss-catalina-service depends on
> lib-sax-java. There's not such a packet (i think it should be
> lib-saxon-java). Where's lib-sax-java?
Fetch it from potato. The other developers conspired against me, and had it
removed
On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, Nicolai P Guba wrote:
> On Monday 08 July 2002 12:36 am, Adam Heath wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 4 Jul 2002, Nicolai P Guba wrote:
> > > Will they solve the problems with the ejb-spec too? ;)
> >
> > Nah, need to get rid of sun.
>
> Both suck.
On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, Nicolai P Guba wrote:
> On Monday 08 July 2002 12:36 am, Adam Heath wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 4 Jul 2002, Nicolai P Guba wrote:
> > > Will they solve the problems with the ejb-spec too? ;)
> >
> > Nah, need to get rid of sun.
>
> Both suck.
On Thu, 4 Jul 2002, Nicolai P Guba wrote:
> Will they solve the problems with the ejb-spec too? ;)
Nah, need to get rid of sun.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 4 Jul 2002, Nicolai P Guba wrote:
> Will they solve the problems with the ejb-spec too? ;)
Nah, need to get rid of sun.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Nicolai P Guba wrote:
> The entire JBoss setup is not very graceful indeed. We have been using it as
> a service platform for over 16 months now and are thinking of replacing it
> with our own server (non-EJB compliant, since it's the ejb spec that is the
> real problem).
My
On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Stefan Gybas wrote:
> All the XML API classes (DOM SAX, TrAX, ...) have been split into a
> separate project at xml.apache.org. I'll package this ASAP and hope that
> I can put it into main and make the libxerces2-java and libxalan2-java
> depend on it.
Sounds good.
> You cou
On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Greg Wilkins wrote:
> I agree that it sounds easiest if you do the packaging and then tell me
> what you need changed in the release to support it.
When I have time, I'll look. I can't promise any timeline tho(my free time is
currently taken up by optimizing dpkg(I'm a dpkg d
On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Nicolai P Guba wrote:
> The entire JBoss setup is not very graceful indeed. We have been using it as
> a service platform for over 16 months now and are thinking of replacing it
> with our own server (non-EJB compliant, since it's the ejb spec that is the
> real problem).
My
On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Stefan Gybas wrote:
> All the XML API classes (DOM SAX, TrAX, ...) have been split into a
> separate project at xml.apache.org. I'll package this ASAP and hope that
> I can put it into main and make the libxerces2-java and libxalan2-java
> depend on it.
Sounds good.
> You co
On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Greg Wilkins wrote:
> I agree that it sounds easiest if you do the packaging and then tell me
> what you need changed in the release to support it.
When I have time, I'll look. I can't promise any timeline tho(my free time is
currently taken up by optimizing dpkg(I'm a dpkg
On 28 Jun 2002, Jim Pick wrote:
> Cool. Looks like a lot of work. :-)
>
> I'll have to give 'em a try (and eventually, with Kaffe).
jboss uses java.lang.reflect.Proxy(or whatever it is). It also uses exit
finaliziers.
Personally, I haven't tried it with kaffe, but I would bet it wouldn't work
On Sat, 29 Jun 2002, Greg Wilkins wrote:
>
> Adam,
>
> Sounds like great work.
>
> I'm the maintainer/developer of Jetty, a jboss developer and a debian user
> so I'm keen to help create a debian package for Jetty to fit in with your
> JBoss work.
>
> But I know zip about making debian packages, s
On 28 Jun 2002, Jim Pick wrote:
> Cool. Looks like a lot of work. :-)
>
> I'll have to give 'em a try (and eventually, with Kaffe).
jboss uses java.lang.reflect.Proxy(or whatever it is). It also uses exit
finaliziers.
Personally, I haven't tried it with kaffe, but I would bet it wouldn't wor
On Sat, 29 Jun 2002, Greg Wilkins wrote:
>
> Adam,
>
> Sounds like great work.
>
> I'm the maintainer/developer of Jetty, a jboss developer and a debian user
> so I'm keen to help create a debian package for Jetty to fit in with your
> JBoss work.
>
> But I know zip about making debian packages,
I am proud to announce that I have finally finished(well, close enough,
anyways) the debs of JBoss(www.jboss.org). You can fetch them by adding the
appropriate line(1) to /etc/apt/sources.list.
These debs are modular, and broken up into semi-logic parts. To install
jboss, with catalina(tomcat4)
On Sun, 12 May 2002, Per Bothner wrote:
> Also, what happens if you install a Java package, and then install
> gcj later? Shuld that so the compilation to .so when you install
> gcj?
Each emacs extension packages places hooks into a site-wide dir. Then, all
the emacsen are processed over each f
On 12 May 2002, Jim Pick wrote:
> Sounds like Debian could use the same solution for gcj that Debian uses
> for emacs -> just distribute the .java files and do the ahead-of-time
> compilation (.java to .so) at install time. Is this automatic enough
> under gcj so that this could that work?
Let m
On Sun, 12 May 2002, Andrew Pimlott wrote:
> Ok, then it is just a question of naming. Say my foo library can be
> compiled to .class files and GCJ .so files. One option is to
> package both in libfoo-java, which would be architecture specific.
> But if you want to split them into an architectur
On Sun, 12 May 2002, Egon Willighagen wrote:
> And the same for gcj? Is there an easy way to port a Ant based compilation
> to some Makefile like stuff for compiling with gcj? Is there a good tutorial
> on it somewhere?
I've got a makefile based build system, that supports jdk-like jvms(kaffe,
su
On 12 May 2002, Jim Pick wrote:
> Also, as the upstream kaffe maintainer, I'd really like it if for each
> package that was stuck in contrib because kaffe can't run it (eg.
> unimplemented APIs, etc), there was a "wishlist" bug filed against kaffe
> stating how it fails. I suppose that goes for t
On 12 May 2002, Nic Ferrier wrote:
> 2.5. Main, contrib or non-free
>
>
>
> If your binary package can run only with non-free virtual machines
> (the only free Java virtual machine seems to be kaffe - and the one
> included in libgcj), it cannot go to main. If your package itself is
>
On Sun, 12 May 2002, Per Bothner wrote:
> Also, what happens if you install a Java package, and then install
> gcj later? Shuld that so the compilation to .so when you install
> gcj?
Each emacs extension packages places hooks into a site-wide dir. Then, all
the emacsen are processed over each
On 12 May 2002, Jim Pick wrote:
> Sounds like Debian could use the same solution for gcj that Debian uses
> for emacs -> just distribute the .java files and do the ahead-of-time
> compilation (.java to .so) at install time. Is this automatic enough
> under gcj so that this could that work?
Let
On Sun, 12 May 2002, Andrew Pimlott wrote:
> Ok, then it is just a question of naming. Say my foo library can be
> compiled to .class files and GCJ .so files. One option is to
> package both in libfoo-java, which would be architecture specific.
> But if you want to split them into an architectu
On Sun, 12 May 2002, Egon Willighagen wrote:
> And the same for gcj? Is there an easy way to port a Ant based compilation
> to some Makefile like stuff for compiling with gcj? Is there a good tutorial
> on it somewhere?
I've got a makefile based build system, that supports jdk-like jvms(kaffe,
s
On 12 May 2002, Jim Pick wrote:
> Also, as the upstream kaffe maintainer, I'd really like it if for each
> package that was stuck in contrib because kaffe can't run it (eg.
> unimplemented APIs, etc), there was a "wishlist" bug filed against kaffe
> stating how it fails. I suppose that goes for
On 12 May 2002, Nic Ferrier wrote:
> 2.5. Main, contrib or non-free
>
>
>
> If your binary package can run only with non-free virtual machines
> (the only free Java virtual machine seems to be kaffe - and the one
> included in libgcj), it cannot go to main. If your package itself is
>
On 9 May 2002, Grzegorz Prokopski wrote:
> If no - then the dependencies of ArgoUML won't be fulfiled in Debian.
> Will it prevent the package from entering contrib section?
Packages on contrib are free, but depend on non-free packages, either in
contrib, or outside of debian.
> I know that JBos
On 7 May 2002, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> Anyway time for a new dump :
> * changed test "rpmmode=true" to "standalone=false" since
> jpackage rpms aim at a correct & standard setup, if someone
> (like debian) thinks we abuse a standard we should fix the our
> rp
On Sat, 30 Mar 2002, Brett Sealey wrote:
> For a while there, Adam Heath was working on JBoss debs, not sure how far
> he got.
Still am. Got invovled working on a website at work.
We do use the debs on our own sites, tho.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subj
On Sat, 30 Mar 2002, Brett Sealey wrote:
> For a while there, Adam Heath was working on JBoss debs, not sure how far
> he got.
Still am. Got invovled working on a website at work.
We do use the debs on our own sites, tho.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subj
On Tue, 19 Mar 2002, Nicolas SABOURET wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I intend to package arkanae, a 3D role playing game written in Java and
> OpenGL. It requires GL4Java, an OpenGL binding for Java (see
> http://www.jausoft.com/gl4java.html).
> Sadly, both programs (arkanae and gl4java) require jdk >= 1.2.
> O
On Tue, 19 Mar 2002, Nicolas SABOURET wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I intend to package arkanae, a 3D role playing game written in Java and
> OpenGL. It requires GL4Java, an OpenGL binding for Java (see
> http://www.jausoft.com/gl4java.html).
> Sadly, both programs (arkanae and gl4java) require jdk >= 1.2.
>
On Tue, 12 Feb 2002, Adam Heath wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, Stefan Gybas wrote:
>
> > Who wants to package openjmx? If nobody sends an ITP within the next
> > 24 hours, I'll do it. Packaging looks very simple: Just call Ant.
>
> I'll do it. I need it for jbo
On Tue, 12 Feb 2002, Adam Heath wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, Stefan Gybas wrote:
>
> > Who wants to package openjmx? If nobody sends an ITP within the next
> > 24 hours, I'll do it. Packaging looks very simple: Just call Ant.
>
> I'll do it. I need it for jbo
On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, Stefan Gybas wrote:
> Stefan Gybas wrote:
>
> > I'm just trying to figure out why Tomcat does not work with a security
> > manager on JDK 1.3 but works fine on JDK 1.4. Has anyone experience with
> > this?
>
> I found the problem: It seems that JDK 1.3 does follow symlinks wh
On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, Stefan Gybas wrote:
> Adam Heath wrote:
>
> > I should have packages done by no later than this weekend, as I juggle it in
> > with work. Can you hold off uploading tomcat4 until at least then?
>
> Sure, I'll need some more test versions anyw
On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, Stefan Gybas wrote:
> Who wants to package openjmx? If nobody sends an ITP within the next
> 24 hours, I'll do it. Packaging looks very simple: Just call Ant.
I'll do it. I need it for jboss as well.
I should have packages done by no later than this weekend, as I juggle it
On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, Stefan Gybas wrote:
> Adam Heath wrote:
>
> > EmbeddedManager depends on jmxri.jar.
>
> Right, from Catalina's build.xml:
>
> unless="compile.jmx"/>
> unless="compile.jmx"/>
>
On Tue, 12 Feb 2002, Adam Heath wrote:
> [16:59:32,353,ConfigurationService] Could not create MBean
> Catalina:name=Catalina(org.apache.catalina.startup.EmbeddedManager)
> java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.apache.catalina.startup.EmbeddedManager
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/
1 - 100 of 179 matches
Mail list logo
