Re: Building r-cran-rcdk with cdk [Was: Re: Upgrading freehep to latest upstream (needed by cdk and probably others)]

Hi Tony, On 2020-07-29 06:41, tony mancill wrote: > Fair enough... In the long run, it is likely that porting r-cran-rcdk > is a better use of time. However, I got interested in it and here is > the status so far: > > 1) I updated jgrapht0.6 to install a pom file and uploaded a new > package to

Re: Building r-cran-rcdk with cdk [Was: Re: Upgrading freehep to latest upstream (needed by cdk and probably others)]

On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 11:56:24AM +0300, mer...@debian.org wrote: > Hi Tony, > > On 2020-07-27 16:50, tony mancill wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 08:51:49AM +0300, mer...@debian.org wrote: > >> What is more, the subtree tool/smsd/ contains only pom.xml, what might > >> be the reason of codele

Re: Building r-cran-rcdk with cdk [Was: Re: Upgrading freehep to latest upstream (needed by cdk and probably others)]

Hi Tony, On 2020-07-27 16:50, tony mancill wrote: > On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 08:51:49AM +0300, mer...@debian.org wrote: >> What is more, the subtree tool/smsd/ contains only pom.xml, what might >> be the reason of codeless jar. It seems to me that cdk-smsd is legacy >> now, and I would suggest aski