Re: jPedal / JavaFX PDF Viewer

2015-09-08 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hi: Thanks for your reply. On 08/09/15 17:57, Markus Koschany wrote: > Am 08.09.2015 um 17:24 schrieb Jerome BENOIT: >> Hello Forum: >> >> I am considering to package jPedal [0,1], or at least to change to ITP the >> un-activated RFP #547142 [2]. >> Before all, I surprise that it was not yet bro

Re: jPedal / JavaFX PDF Viewer

2015-09-08 Thread Markus Koschany
Am 08.09.2015 um 17:24 schrieb Jerome BENOIT: > Hello Forum: > > I am considering to package jPedal [0,1], or at least to change to ITP the > un-activated RFP #547142 [2]. > Before all, I surprise that it was not yet brought to Debian: is ther any > good reason for that ? > Hi, I'm not aware

jPedal / JavaFX PDF Viewer

2015-09-08 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hello Forum: I am considering to package jPedal [0,1], or at least to change to ITP the un-activated RFP #547142 [2]. Before all, I surprise that it was not yet brought to Debian: is ther any good reason for that ? Thanks, Jerome [0] https://www.idrsolutions.com/openviewerfx/ [1] http://source

Asking review for the picard-tools package

2015-09-08 Thread Vincent Danjean
On 08/09/2015 09:39, Vincent Danjean wrote: > On 08/09/2015 02:02, Vincent Danjean wrote: >> I'm annoyed with the current package: the tests fail when the >> sources are in a directory containing a '+'. And, due to the repack >> and the +dfsg suffix, my sbuilder put the source into a >> «BUILDDIR

Re: Asking help for the picard-tools package

2015-09-08 Thread Vincent Danjean
On 08/09/2015 02:02, Vincent Danjean wrote: > I'm annoyed with the current package: the tests fail when the > sources are in a directory containing a '+'. And, due to the repack > and the +dfsg suffix, my sbuilder put the source into a > «BUILDDIR»/picard-tools-1.138+dfsg.1 directory. In fact,