Re: help groovy packaging

2013-10-27 Thread Miguel Landaeta
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 08:31:41PM +0200, Ioan Eugen Stan wrote: > Hello Miguel, > > I'm Ioan Eugen Stan and I'm interested in having Groovy 2.0 packaged for > Debian. Hi Ioan, nice to meet you. > This is not my first attempt with Debian Java packaging but I don't > wish to quit until I see it

Re: RFS: maven-invoker/2.1.1-1 - [UPLOADED]

2013-10-27 Thread tony mancill
On 10/24/2013 08:22 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Hi all, > > I updated the maven-invoker package to the latest upstream release and > I'm looking for a sponsor to upload it. The reverse dependencies build > fine with the new version. Thank you for testing the r-build-deps. Uploaded and tagged. C

RFS: eclipselink 2.5.1-1 (updated package)

2013-10-27 Thread Andrew Ross
Dear Debian Java Team members, I am looking for a sponsor for my update to the package eclipselink. This is a dependency of the latest version of Netbeans. The changelog is as follows: eclipselink (2.5.1-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release. (Closes: #725375). * Bump Standards-Ve

Re: RFS: libnb-platform18-java (7.4+dfsg1-1)

2013-10-27 Thread Andrew Ross
On 25/10/13 17:25, tony wrote: > On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 04:57:30PM +0100, Andrew Ross wrote: >> [...] >> Hi Tony, >> >> Thanks for looking at the package. I should have mentioned that the >> build system tries to do all sorts of crazy things if you don't have the >> patches applied. This is the ca

help groovy packaging

2013-10-27 Thread Ioan Eugen Stan
Hello Miguel, I'm Ioan Eugen Stan and I'm interested in having Groovy 2.0 packaged for Debian. I use Debian for some yeaers now on my laptop and also n most server machines that I command. Besides Debian I'm a Java/Groovy/JVM developer and would like to see better support in this regard in Debian

Re: RFS: plexus-classworlds2/2.5.1-2

2013-10-27 Thread tony mancill
On 10/26/2013 01:43 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Thank you for the upload Tony. Unfortunately there was a subtle mistake > in this upgrade and I have to request a new upload. > > The Maven packaging changed from 'jar' to 'bundle' in the new upstream > version, and the Maven rule transforming the ve

Re: Are there any java7-jdk providers other then openjdk-7-jdk?

2013-10-27 Thread Matthias Klose
Am 26.10.2013 17:05, schrieb Joachim Zobel: > Hi. > > There are none in wheezy, are there any outside of debian? ubuntu? > oracle? > > (I found I can reduce complexity of my netbeans patch if I go straight > for openjdk-7-jdk instead of java7-jdk). how does it "reduce complexity"? -- To UNSUB