On 25/10/13 17:25, tony wrote: > On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 04:57:30PM +0100, Andrew Ross wrote: >> [...] >> Hi Tony, >> >> Thanks for looking at the package. I should have mentioned that the >> build system tries to do all sorts of crazy things if you don't have the >> patches applied. This is the case even when trying to clean the package. >> Is it acceptable to push all the patches as the first step of the clean >> rule? Or is there another way to make sure they're applied before cleaning? >> >> Thanks, >> Andy > > Hi Andy, > > /me blushes - obviously I didn't spend enough time looking into the > packaging before mailing the list. I need to spend some quality time > looking into your question about patching and then will get back to > you. > > Thank you, > tony Hi Tony,
I've done a bit of searching, and found the thread [1] which is somewhat related. Thinking further I think it's best just to fail the build rather than go patching things, so I've pushed a minor update which checks for the (lack of) existence of one of the binaries-list files which are what cause the build system to go downloading dependencies. Hopefully this is a reasonable solution for now at least. Thanks, Andy [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2012/05/msg00799.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/526d645e.1020...@rossfamily.co.uk
