On 08/04/2013 01:50 PM, Stephen Nelson wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 12:57 AM, tony mancill wrote:
>> Yes, the procedure for a new tomcat release is to generate the new
>> orig.tar.gz, import it using git-import-orig, and then determine which
>> of the debian/patches can be dropped. Typically i
Hi Java Maintainers,
I've had a little bit of time to work on the Netbeans package recently,
and have something basically working. What I need help with now is to
review and finish off some package updates and new packages, and then
help with reviewing and tidying up the main packages themselves.
Hi Emmanuel,
On 05.08.2013 17:05, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
[...]
> Did you consider upgrading only to 2.5.2? There will be less
> compatibility issues.
No, I didn't. I guess I thought either the latest version or nothing at
all. :)
I have successfully compiled easymock 2.5.2, the tests work and so
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2013 17:18:05 +0200
Source: java-common
Binary: java-common default-jre default-jre-headless default-jdk
default-jdk-doc gcj-native-helper
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 0.49
Distribution: unstable
U
java-common_0.49_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
java-common_0.49.dsc
java-common_0.49.tar.gz
java-common_0.49_all.deb
default-jdk-doc_0.49_all.deb
default-jre_1.7-49_amd64.deb
default-jre-headless_1.7-49_amd64.deb
default-jdk_1.7-49_amd64.deb
Your message dated Mon, 05 Aug 2013 16:33:25 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#687841: fixed in java-common 0.49
has caused the Debian Bug report #687841,
regarding java-common: [Policy] please explicitly state copyright and license
in Java Policy
to be marked as done.
This means that y
Hi Markus,
Le 05/08/2013 15:14, Markus Koschany a écrit :
> Now I'm not sure how I should proceed to fix #713751.
>
> 1. Disabling the tests in easymock. (simplest solution, do nothing else)
> 2. Updating the package to 3.2 but then we would need also a solution
> for the aforementioned packages
Hi everyone,
I'm working on RC bug #713751, failing tests with easymock. It looks
like that the package FTBFS due to how ant or junit detect Junit tests.
I can see Junit4 test annotations (@Test) but also tests that use the
old convention with the word "test" as a prefix. I presume this might
conf
8 matches
Mail list logo