RFS: eclipse-eclox (new package)

2013-06-18 Thread Graham Inggs
Dear Java packagers I'm looking for someone to review and sponsor the following package, please: * Package name : eclipse-eclox Version : 0.8.0 Upstream Author : Guillaume Brocker * URL : http://home.gna.org/eclox/ * License : GPL-2+ Description : simple doxygen frontend plug-in for Eclip

Re: Java defaults for kfreebsd-amd64

2013-06-18 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 11:58:30PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > 2013/6/18 Rene Engelhard : > > I am not sure. It built, yes, but running has some problems apparently: > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libreoffice&arch=kfreebsd-amd64&ver=1%3A4.1.0~beta2-1&stamp=1370824274 > > Are

Re: RFS: mockito 1.9.5+ds-1 [ITA]

2013-06-18 Thread gregor herrmann
On Tue, 18 Jun 2013 23:51:07 +0200, Markus Koschany wrote: > > If you or I would have changed something after the tag we would have > > needed to delete it and re-create it and then overone who has already > > pulled is unhappy -- at least that's my maybe wrong understanding :) > Just a short comm

jarwrapper dependency

2013-06-18 Thread Eugene Zhukov
Hello, How to add jarwrapper dependency (functionality) to a package debianized with mh_make? Simply adding it to depends in d/control seems to have no effect. Thanks, Eugene -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact list

Re: Java defaults for kfreebsd-amd64

2013-06-18 Thread Robert Millan
2013/6/18 Rene Engelhard : > I am not sure. It built, yes, but running has some problems apparently: > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libreoffice&arch=kfreebsd-amd64&ver=1%3A4.1.0~beta2-1&stamp=1370824274 Are you sure those problems are not caused precisely because of gcj? In the b

Re: RFS: mockito 1.9.5+ds-1 [ITA]

2013-06-18 Thread Markus Koschany
On 18.06.2013 23:23, gregor herrmann wrote: > On Tue, 18 Jun 2013 23:10:32 +0200, Markus Koschany wrote: [...] > > If you or I would have changed something after the tag we would have > needed to delete it and re-create it and then overone who has already > pulled is unhappy -- at least that's m

Re: RFS: mockito 1.9.5+ds-1 [ITA]

2013-06-18 Thread gregor herrmann
On Tue, 18 Jun 2013 23:10:32 +0200, Markus Koschany wrote: > >> I am looking for a sponsor for my package mockito which i intend to > >> adopt. It builds also fine with its reverse dependencies. > > Uploaded, from/to the pkg-java git repo. > Thank you very much for the quick upload and your review

Re: RFS: mockito 1.9.5+ds-1 [ITA]

2013-06-18 Thread Russ Allbery
Markus Koschany writes: > Ok, normally i would even go for debhelper 9 as i did for all other > packages except mediathekview. It appears to me that java packages don't > benefit as much from the latest debhelper version as c or c++ packages > and some people have claimed on mentors that a lower

Re: RFS: mockito 1.9.5+ds-1 [ITA]

2013-06-18 Thread Markus Koschany
On 18.06.2013 21:41, gregor herrmann wrote: > On Tue, 18 Jun 2013 12:52:29 +0200, Markus Koschany wrote: > >> I am looking for a sponsor for my package mockito which i intend to >> adopt. It builds also fine with its reverse dependencies. > > Uploaded, from/to the pkg-java git repo. Thank you ve

Re: RFS: mockito 1.9.5+ds-1 [ITA]

2013-06-18 Thread gregor herrmann
On Tue, 18 Jun 2013 12:52:29 +0200, Markus Koschany wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package mockito which i intend to > adopt. It builds also fine with its reverse dependencies. Uploaded, from/to the pkg-java git repo. Some minor remarks: - In my experience the git tag is set by the

Re: junit issue

2013-06-18 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Could this be the same issue fixed on commons-compress recently? Try adding ant-junit4.jar to the classpath. Emmanuel Bourg Le 18/06/2013 13:11, Olivier Sallou a écrit : > Hi, > one of my packages (biojava3-live) fails to build after a dependency > update (which one?). > > What is strange is it

Re: RFS: mockito 1.9.5+ds-1 [ITA]

2013-06-18 Thread Markus Koschany
Hi Emmanuel, On 18.06.2013 13:08, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Hi Markus, > > Thank you for taking care of Mockito. I see you have moved the > maintenance to the Debian Java Maintainers which is great. Could you > just move the Git repository on Alioth under the pkg-java directory > please? People in

RFS: libjuniversalchardet-java (new package)

2013-06-18 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Hi all, I'm looking for a sponsor to upload libjuniversalchardet-java. This is a new package required for Gerrit and Apache Tika (ITP: #685873). The source can be accessed here: git+ssh://git.debian.org/git/pkg-java/libjuniversalchardet-java.git Thank you, Emmanuel Bourg signature.asc Descr

Re: junit issue

2013-06-18 Thread Olivier Sallou
On 06/18/2013 03:06 PM, James Page wrote: > Hi Olivier > > On 18/06/13 12:11, Olivier Sallou wrote: >> What is strange is it fails at junit time (via ant task) with error: >> java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: junit/framework/JUnit4TestAdapterCache >> >> [junit] Running org.biojava3.core.sequenc

Re: junit issue

2013-06-18 Thread James Page
Hi Olivier On 18/06/13 12:11, Olivier Sallou wrote: What is strange is it fails at junit time (via ant task) with error: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: junit/framework/JUnit4TestAdapterCache [junit] Running org.biojava3.core.sequence.DNATest [junit] Testsuite: org.biojava3.core.seque

Re: Java defaults for kfreebsd-amd64

2013-06-18 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 12:02:00PM +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > The problem seen during libreoffice build might even be related to the > openjdk-7 build issue on kfreebsd-i386. Yeah, probably. (Seen that too) Regards, Rene -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org

junit issue

2013-06-18 Thread Olivier Sallou
Hi, one of my packages (biojava3-live) fails to build after a dependency update (which one?). What is strange is it fails at junit time (via ant task) with error: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: junit/framework/JUnit4TestAdapterCache [junit] Running org.biojava3.core.sequence.DNATest [ju

Re: RFS: mockito 1.9.5+ds-1 [ITA]

2013-06-18 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Hi Markus, Thank you for taking care of Mockito. I see you have moved the maintenance to the Debian Java Maintainers which is great. Could you just move the Git repository on Alioth under the pkg-java directory please? People in the pkg-java group don't have write access to collab-maint. Thank yo

Re: Java defaults for kfreebsd-amd64

2013-06-18 Thread Steven Chamberlain
On 18/06/13 11:47, Rene Engelhard wrote: > I am not sure. It built, yes, but running has some problems apparently: > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libreoffice&arch=kfreebsd-amd64&ver=1%3A4.1.0~beta2-1&stamp=1370824274 Oh sorry, did not know about that. We don't want to change thi

RFS: mockito 1.9.5+ds-1 [ITA]

2013-06-18 Thread Markus Koschany
Dear Java Team, I am looking for a sponsor for my package mockito which i intend to adopt. It builds also fine with its reverse dependencies. Package name: mockito Version : 1.9.5+ds-1 Upstream Author : Mockito contributors URL : http://code.google.com/p/mockito License

Re: Java defaults for kfreebsd-amd64

2013-06-18 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 11:19:13AM +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > Please could kfreebsd-amd64 be added to the list of openjdk-7 arches on > the next upload of java-common? (patch attached) I am not sure. It built, yes, but running has some problems apparently: https://buildd.debian.org/s

Re: Java defaults for kfreebsd-amd64

2013-06-18 Thread Matthias Klose
Am 18.06.2013 12:19, schrieb Steven Chamberlain: > Hi Java maintainers, > > Please could kfreebsd-amd64 be added to the list of openjdk-7 arches on > the next upload of java-common? (patch attached) mips and mipsel should stay with openjdk-6. not built anymore in -7. Matthias -- To UNSUBSC

Java defaults for kfreebsd-amd64

2013-06-18 Thread Steven Chamberlain
Hi Java maintainers, Please could kfreebsd-amd64 be added to the list of openjdk-7 arches on the next upload of java-common? (patch attached) kfreebsd-i386 may follow in the future but it is not ready yet. Thanks, Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org --- java-common/debian/rules (