Markus Koschany <a...@gambaru.de> writes: > Ok, normally i would even go for debhelper 9 as i did for all other > packages except mediathekview. It appears to me that java packages don't > benefit as much from the latest debhelper version as c or c++ packages > and some people have claimed on mentors that a lower compat level is > then more beneficial for backports. I have no problems to bump the > compat level to 9 with the next upload.
debhelper 9 is in squeeze-backports and released with wheezy, so there's really no reason to avoid it. When backporting to squeeze, you have to build with a squeeze-backports-enabled repository to get the backported debhelper, but usually that's no big deal. >> - You might also want to add >> echo "compression = xz" > debian/source/options > Ok, but we need xz compression as default...now. :) I believe that's in the works for binary packages. I'm not sure if it's also in the works for source packages. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/871u7zi05f....@windlord.stanford.edu
