Hi all,
I updated the antlr3 package to fix the broken watch file. I unveiled a
bug in the process (#706172) but I couldn't find the right solution to
fix it.
Here is the changelog:
* Updated Standards-Version to 3.9.4 (no changes)
* Updated the watch file
* Converted debian/copyright to t
Mathieu Malaterre writes:
> I am not a java expert clearly but I fear that maintaining those symbols
> will be difficult, maybe just as difficult as C++ symbols are (think:
> java generics).
It would be somewhat less difficult than C++ symbols because Java doesn't
have interfaces that change bas
Le 25/04/2013 17:20, Niels Thykier a écrit :
> Uploaded, thanks for your contribution. :) Please remember to add a tag
> in the VCS for this package.
Tagged, thank you!
Emmanuel Bourg
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Le 25/04/2013 17:56, Niels Thykier a écrit :
> I am therefore considering to make jh_depends (javatools) to generating
> "$pkg (>= ${installed-upstream-version})" dependencies by default.
> Given all the information available in the pom files, the maven helper
> tools may be able to give better (i
If the issue is to prevent broken reverse dependencies when a package is
updated a solution could be to use a continuous integration system. The
reverse dependencies would be rebuilt automatically when the package is
updated, and the errors reported on the mailing list.
If possible I would to that
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 5:56 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On a related note, would it make sense to deploy something like "shlibs"
> files for Java? I have experimented with adding "symbols" files in the
> past and they tend to be rather large if every symbol must be covered.
> Though if we reduce
Hi,
As the topic suggests I want to talk about improving the situation on
auto-generating versioned dependencies via our helper tools (e.g.
javahelper and maven-*-helper).
At the moment, javahelper doesn't add versioned dependencies, which is
actually really bad. I am not sure what the situation
On 2013-04-25 12:13, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I updated the venerable antlr package to fix the watch file as well as
> minor Lintian warnings on the copyright file. I guess it's safe enough
> to target unstable.
>
> Here is the changelog:
>
> * Updated the watch file (contributed by
Le 25/04/2013 12:53, Olivier Sallou a écrit :
> Hi Emmanuel,
> did you progress on jexl2 ? I did not see it on mentors.debian.net
Hi Olivier,
I uploaded the package on mentors, let me know how it works for you. Do
you want to sponsor it?
http://mentors.debian.net/package/libcommons-jexl2-java
Hi Emmanuel,
did you progress on jexl2 ? I did not see it on mentors.debian.net
Thanks
Olivier
On 04/10/2013 04:57 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 10/04/2013 16:41, Olivier Sallou a écrit :
>
>> do you know if there is someone working on libcommons-jexl2-java ?
>>
>> I saw a recent mail talking ab
Hi all,
I updated the venerable antlr package to fix the watch file as well as
minor Lintian warnings on the copyright file. I guess it's safe enough
to target unstable.
Here is the changelog:
* Updated the watch file (contributed by Bart Martens)
* Bumped Standards-Version to 3.9.4 (no chan
Le 24/04/2013 16:38, Felipe FV a écrit :
> I really would appreciate some help on how things work at Java
> development here. Where could I start?
Hi Felipe,
Thank you for offering your help. I was in your position some time ago
and I struggled a bit to get started. There is a lot of documentati
12 matches
Mail list logo
