Mathieu Malaterre <[email protected]> writes: > I am not a java expert clearly but I fear that maintaining those symbols > will be difficult, maybe just as difficult as C++ symbols are (think: > java generics).
It would be somewhat less difficult than C++ symbols because Java doesn't have interfaces that change based on the word size or low-level data types of the hosting platform, which is where a lot of the complexity of C++ symbol handling comes in. We would need to store something equivalent to the C++ mangled name so that we can capture all the details of the ABI. -- Russ Allbery ([email protected]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
