Re: Questions about simplyhtml[-freeplane] package

2012-12-01 Thread Eric Lavarde
Hi, On 01/12/12 18:01, Felix Natter wrote: The problem is in the search dialog ("FindReplaceDialog"): There is a new "Approximate" check box which needs two things to work: (1) some translations: jcbMatchApprox.setText(Util.getResourceString(SHTMLPanel.getResources(), "matchApproxima

Re: RFS: eclipse-linuxtools 1.2.0-1 (new for experimental) - [UPLOADED]

2012-12-01 Thread tony mancill
On 12/01/2012 11:29 AM, Jakub Adam wrote: > Dear java packagers, > > I am looking for a sponsor for package "eclipse-linuxtools". > > * Package name: eclipse-linuxtools >Version : 1.2.0-1 Uploaded. Thank you for the update. Cheers, tony signature.asc Description: OpenPGP d

Re: New package maintainer (assistant)

2012-12-01 Thread Felix Natter
Thomas Koch writes: hi Thomas, > Taking Ludovic out of CC to not bother him too much. > > Felix Natter: >> There is a problem in "setup-repository": >> I get "[: 13: freeplane: unexpected operator" (but the script still >> works). >> >> It looks like for non-bash shells we need "=" instead of "

Re: Bug#675495: downgrading the severity of #675495 (openjdk-6 in wheezy)

2012-12-01 Thread David Gerard
On 28 November 2012 16:20, Julien Cristau wrote: > OpenJDK Security support has always been a nightmare for the security > team because there was no support from the maintainers. Security support > s primarily the responsibility of the maintainer. I understood the plan for OpenJDK 6 was that th

Re: Porting src:openjdk-6 to m68k (II)

2012-12-01 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Matthias Klose dixit: >If you want a reply from the OpenJDK packagers, please feel free to send email >to them, or at least CC me. I thought debian-java reached them? I was told to use it… >If you submit a patch for 6, please always send one for 7 as well. Don't patch >the upstream source direct

Re: Porting src:openjdk-6 to m68k (II)

2012-12-01 Thread Matthias Klose
Am 28.11.2012 22:07, schrieb Thorsten Glaser: > Dixi quod… > >> If one of you, either java or porter guys, has further suggestions, >> just tell ☺ > > That includes if I should stop bothering with -6 and try -7 > immediately, considering reading about #675495 now. The B-D > are there, nowadays. >

RFS: eclipse-linuxtools 1.2.0-1 (new for experimental)

2012-12-01 Thread Jakub Adam
Dear java packagers, I am looking for a sponsor for package "eclipse-linuxtools". * Package name: eclipse-linuxtools Version : 1.2.0-1 Upstream Author : Eclipse Linux Tools project * URL : http://www.eclipse.org/linuxtools * License : EPL-1.0 Section

Re: Questions about simplyhtml[-freeplane] package

2012-12-01 Thread Felix Natter
Eric Lavarde writes: > Hi, > > On 25/11/12 09:47, Felix Natter wrote: >> Unfortunately, simplyhtml 0.16.05 requires Java5, while freemind >> only requires Java4. This is because I implemented an approximate string >> matching algorithm for freeplane (using enums, thus requiring Java5) >> and incl

Re: New package maintainer (assistant)

2012-12-01 Thread Thomas Koch
Taking Ludovic out of CC to not bother him too much. Felix Natter: > There is a problem in "setup-repository": > I get "[: 13: freeplane: unexpected operator" (but the script still > works). > > It looks like for non-bash shells we need "=" instead of "==": > if [ "$pkgname" = "" ]; then Thank yo

Re: New package maintainer (assistant)

2012-12-01 Thread Felix Natter
Thomas Koch writes: > Felix Natter: >> > the repository with pristine-tar. Are you familiar with pristine-tar? >> >> No, not yet. I don't understand this: "pristine-tar can regenerate a >> pristine upstream tarball using only a small binary delta file and a >> copy of the source which can be a r

Re: Questions about simplyhtml[-freeplane] package

2012-12-01 Thread Eric Lavarde
Hi, On 01/12/12 14:09, Eric Lavarde wrote: Back on your issue with get-orig-source, it works like a charm here: I think I know what happened: you had already modified the changelog to 0.16.05 in which case uscan doesn't download anything because it considers that you are already at the new v

Re: Questions about simplyhtml[-freeplane] package

2012-12-01 Thread Eric Lavarde
Hi, On 25/11/12 09:47, Felix Natter wrote: Unfortunately, simplyhtml 0.16.05 requires Java5, while freemind only requires Java4. This is because I implemented an approximate string matching algorithm for freeplane (using enums, thus requiring Java5) and included the source code for it in simplyh