On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 7:53 PM, Egon Willighagen
wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> The issue is that it fails to clean properly - at least some (java)doc
>> files are not cleaned, but also some non-text files (can't remember - I
>> didn't pay too much attention to
Hi Niels,
On 23.5.2012 08:30, Niels Thykier wrote:
Hi,
I see the pristine-tar branch is at eclipse-mylyn/3.6.5+dfsg1 - is that
intentional?
I'm not sure what you mean, pristine-tar branch points to data for
eclipse-mylyn_3.7.1.orig.tar.bz2 [1]. Can you be more specific what's the
problem?
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
> The issue is that it fails to clean properly - at least some (java)doc
> files are not cleaned, but also some non-text files (can't remember - I
> didn't pay too much attention to it). I haven't actually investigated
> the failure that deepl
On 2012-05-23 16:07, Egon Willighagen wrote:
> Hi Niels,
>
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> I "just" read the diff between our current version (1.2.10) and the RFS
>> version 1.4.9. Actually, thanks you just made me realize that it FTBFS
>> when built twice in a row!
>
Hi Niels,
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
> I "just" read the diff between our current version (1.2.10) and the RFS
> version 1.4.9. Actually, thanks you just made me realize that it FTBFS
> when built twice in a row!
Ah, right! Yes, from 1.2 to 1.4 there are API changes..
On 2012-05-23 13:37, Egon Willighagen wrote:
> NIels,
>
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> On 2012-05-19 14:56, Onkar Shinde wrote:
>> It seems that some public methods are changing signature and also that
>> some public constants are disappearing in this release (compare
NIels,
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On 2012-05-19 14:56, Onkar Shinde wrote:
> It seems that some public methods are changing signature and also that
> some public constants are disappearing in this release (compared to our
> current version).
Which ones are those? Th
Hi Team
I am looking for a sponsor for an update to the package "libcommons-codec-java".
* Package name: libcommons-codec-java
Version : 1.6-1
This update includes a new upstream release which implements features required
to support packaging of lucene 3.6.0 which I am currently wo
Le 6/05/12 15:25, Onkar Shinde a écrit :
> Hi all,
Hi,
> We have considerable number of packages (close to 200) in archive
> which build depend on junit package (3.x version).
Is there a list published on some wiki to know who works on which package?
Are there priority packages?
I'd like to he
On 2012-05-19 14:56, Onkar Shinde wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am looking for sponsorship for cdk 1.4.9-1. The packaging bits have
> been updated in pkg-java svn. I have also uploaded new source package
> on mentors.d.n
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cdk/cdk_1.4.9-1.dsc
>
> Please note
On 2012-05-20 14:55, Onkar Shinde wrote:
> On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 6:55 PM, Onkar Shinde wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> We have considerable number of packages (close to 200) in archive
>> which build depend on junit package (3.x version). Considering that
>> this version has been unsupported for long tim
Uploaded, thanks for the changes. :)
~Niels
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fbc92d6.9000...@thykier.net
On 2012-05-19 19:00, Jakub Adam wrote:
> Dear java packagers,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for package "eclipse-linuxtools".
>
> * Package name: eclipse-linuxtools
>Version : 0.10.0-1
>Upstream Author : Eclipse Linux Tools project
>
> * URL : http://www.eclips
13 matches
Mail list logo
