On 2012-05-19 19:00, Jakub Adam wrote: > Dear java packagers, > > I am looking for a sponsor for package "eclipse-linuxtools". > > * Package name : eclipse-linuxtools > Version : 0.10.0-1 > Upstream Author : Eclipse Linux Tools project > <linuxtools-...@eclipse.org> > * URL : http://www.eclipse.org/linuxtools > * License : EPL-1.0 > Section : devel > > It builds those binary packages: > > eclipse-cdt-autotools - Autotools support for Eclipse CDT > eclipse-cdt-valgrind - Valgrind integration for Eclipse CDT > eclipse-cdt-valgrind-remote - Valgrind integration for Eclipse CDT > (remote launch) > > Package sources can be accessed at pkg-java git repository: > > http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-java/eclipse-linuxtools.git > > I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. > > Kind regards, > > Jakub Adam > >
libhover/org.eclipse.linuxtools.cdt.libhover.glibc/data/glibc-2.7-2.libhover is under GFDL-1.1 (according to the Changelog in libhover/org.eclipse.linuxtools.cdt.libhover.glibc), but does not appear as such in d/copyright. GFDL is non-free unless it has no invariant sections[1] (in that case, please use GFDL-NIV in d/copyright)[2]. Also, I highly doubt that the copyright of GFDL files are """Eclipse Linux Tools project""" - knowing upstream they have a *very* strong preference for EPL, so if they owned the files it would almost certainly be EPL. Failing that, it would be a license with "Eclipse" painted all over it (like their "Eclipse BSD/MIT" variant) or Apache-2. I am more inclined to believe they copy-pasted it from other projects, which means there should be a copyright statement from the creators/copyright holders of these files somewhere in the sources (I haven't found it though). If not, I am certain upstream are more than willing to clarify the copyright of those files (given their IP rules it should in fact be piece of cake for them). What are *.dash files[3], do they come with a source and a way to generate them? ~Niels [1] http://www.debian.org/vote/2006/vote_001#outcome It does not seem like they declare any invariant sections, so it should be ok. [2] http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/#license-specification [3] ./systemtap/org.eclipse.linuxtools.systemtap.ui.dashboard/modules/*.dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fbc8e1f.6070...@thykier.net
