Bug#365408: marked as done ([POLICY-PROPOSAL] Drop java*-runtime/compiler, create classpath-jre/jdk and java-jre/jdk)

Your message dated Mon, 16 Aug 2010 08:36:14 +0200 with message-id <4c68dc5e.1090...@thykier.net> and subject line [POLICY-PROPOSAL] Drop java*-runtime/compiler, create, classpath-jre/jdk, and java-jre/jdk has caused the Debian Bug report #365408, regarding [POLICY-PROPOSAL] Drop java*-runtime/com

Bug#354026: marked as done (Debian Java Policy needs to be updated regarding java*-runtime usage)

Your message dated Mon, 16 Aug 2010 08:30:02 +0200 with message-id <4c68daea.3060...@thykier.net> and subject line java-package: generated package should provide java1-runtime has caused the Debian Bug report #354026, regarding Debian Java Policy needs to be updated regarding java*-runtime usage to

Bug#348398: marked as done (java-common: should suggest using java-package instead of equivs)

Your message dated Mon, 16 Aug 2010 08:27:08 +0200 with message-id <4c68da3c.7060...@thykier.net> and subject line java-common: should suggest using java-package instead of equivs has caused the Debian Bug report #348398, regarding java-common: should suggest using java-package instead of equivs t

Bug#166370: marked as done (java-common: Virtual packages "jar" and "javadoc")

Your message dated Mon, 16 Aug 2010 08:25:33 +0200 with message-id <4c68d9dd.8010...@thykier.net> and subject line java-common: Virtual packages "jar" and "javadoc" has caused the Debian Bug report #166370, regarding java-common: Virtual packages "jar" and "javadoc" to be marked as done. This mean

Bug#158984: marked as done (policy proposal: java2 alternative)

Your message dated Mon, 16 Aug 2010 08:24:02 +0200 with message-id <4c68d982.6080...@thykier.net> and subject line policy proposal: java2 alternative - Rejected has caused the Debian Bug report #158984, regarding policy proposal: java2 alternative to be marked as done. This means that you claim th

Processed: notfound 166370 in 0.16, notfound 348398 in java-common/0.23, notfound 158984 in 0.14 ...

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > notfound 166370 0.16 Bug #166370 [java-common] java-common: Virtual packages "jar" and "javadoc" There is no source info for the package 'java-common' at version '0.16' with architecture '' Unable to make a source version for version '0.16' Bug N

Re: Library handling in squeeze + 1

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2010-08-14 21:58, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > Great summary Matthew. Thanks! > > Le vendredi 06 août 2010 à 17:53 +0100, Matthew Johnson a écrit : > > >> I shall write the bits of these which are missing and start staging them via >> experimental

Re: Library handling in squeeze + 1

Great summary Matthew. Thanks! Le vendredi 06 août 2010 à 17:53 +0100, Matthew Johnson a écrit : > I shall write the bits of these which are missing and start staging them via > experimental until squeeze is released. This will mean that essentially all > Java packages must use javahelper, but I

Re: OpenJDK / default JDK for squeeze / issues on mips / open security issues for lenny

Hi, On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Philipp Kern: >> On 08/08/2010 11:21 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: >>> Cool, it's based on OpenJDK 6b18.  However, we can't upload it as-is >>> because the version number is greater than the one in testing. >>> >> >> apart from the fact t

Re: OpenJDK / default JDK for squeeze / issues on mips / open security issues for lenny

* Philipp Kern: > Florian, > > On 08/08/2010 11:21 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: >> Cool, it's based on OpenJDK 6b18. However, we can't upload it as-is >> because the version number is greater than the one in testing. >> > > apart from the fact that this could of course be solved by an upload > t