Re: RFS: ognl

2009-08-10 Thread Hendrik Weimer
Matthew Johnson writes: > I don't like: > > * 5. Products derived from this software may not be called > * "OpenSymphony" > *or "OGNL", nor may "OpenSymphony" or "OGNL" appear in their > *name, without prior written permission of the OpenSymphony > *Group. > > since we are, arguably,

Re: RFS: remotetea - Sun ONC/RPC support for Java

2009-08-10 Thread Matthew Johnson
On Mon Aug 10 13:07, Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel wrote: > > - the package is named remotetea, it includes a library which should > > be depended on (at a guess) by packages built using the tool. If this > > is the case then you should probably have a libremotetea-java package > > which goes in the bu

java-common 0.33 MIGRATED to testing

2009-08-10 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the java-common source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 0.32 Current version: 0.33 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive l

Re: pkg-java team, subversion, git (was: Bug#540756: solr-common: please move packaging to GIT)

2009-08-10 Thread Marcus Better
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jan-Pascal van Best wrote: > I've received a request (see below) to move the packaging of solr to a > git repository. Just FYI: I use git+TopGit for packaging testng, you may "debcheckout" it if you want to have a look. Works pretty well so far. (Ad

Re: pkg-java team, subversion, git (was: Bug#540756: solr-common: please move packaging to GIT)

2009-08-10 Thread Vincent Fourmond
Hello, On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 12:30 PM, Jan-Pascal van Best wrote: > I've received a request (see below) to move the packaging of solr to a > git repository. Solr is currently maintained in the pkg-java subversion > repository. In my opinion, this is as is should be: pkg-java is a team > effort

Re: pkg-java team, subversion, git (was: Bug#540756: solr-common: please move packaging to GIT)

2009-08-10 Thread Thomas Koch
Hi, - Why GIT and not HG, BZR, ... - Bzr is crap, so Hg remains - http://upsilon.cc/~zack/stuff/vcs-usage - KDE, Gnome, Kernel, freedesktop.org, Fedora, Perl5, GNU auto..., Ruby, YUI, hosting at sourceforge ... - would GIT make it harder to get new contributors? - It would lower the b

Re: pkg-java team, subversion, git (was: Bug#540756: solr-common: please move packaging to GIT)

2009-08-10 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 5:09 PM, Torsten Werner wrote: > Hi Jan-Pascal, > > On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 12:30 PM, Jan-Pascal van > Best wrote: >> Any thoughts from the team? > > I would really love to convert out svn repo to git and even volunteer > in doing the actual conversion. > > BUT! > > The numb

Re: pkg-java team, subversion, git (was: Bug#540756: solr-common: please move packaging to GIT)

2009-08-10 Thread Torsten Werner
Hi Jan-Pascal, On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 12:30 PM, Jan-Pascal van Best wrote: > Any thoughts from the team? I would really love to convert out svn repo to git and even volunteer in doing the actual conversion. BUT! The number of active team members is really too low. I think that git would make i

Re: RFS: remotetea - Sun ONC/RPC support for Java

2009-08-10 Thread Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel
Le Sat, 8 Aug 2009 13:42:50 +0100, Matthew Johnson a écrit : > Hi Picca, the package looks very nice, however, I have a few small > queries about it. > > - You have set DM-Upload-Allowed: yes in the control file. I would > rather this field be omitted unless there is actually a DM (as far > as

pkg-java team, subversion, git (was: Bug#540756: solr-common: please move packaging to GIT)

2009-08-10 Thread Jan-Pascal van Best
Dear all, I've received a request (see below) to move the packaging of solr to a git repository. Solr is currently maintained in the pkg-java subversion repository. In my opinion, this is as is should be: pkg-java is a team effort, and the results of that effort are maintained in the pkg-java svn.