Re: javadoc problem with default-jdk

2009-08-05 Thread Ludovic Claude
Matthias, I have just uploaded a new version of maven-debian-helper. It uses Maven to build packages, and supports now the generation of Javadoc packages. There is also a utility, mh_make, which given a Maven project will try to build all the Debian packaging for it. Can you give it a try, it's in

Re: javadoc problem with default-jdk

2009-08-05 Thread Michael Koch
On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 06:05:11PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > >Always put it into /usr/share/doc//api. > > No, this looks wrong, because you cannot enforce this for packages > where the docs are shipped in the same package. You should use > /usr/share/doc//api, and maybe add a directory > /usr

Re: javadoc problem with default-jdk

2009-08-05 Thread Matthias Klose
On 05.08.2009 20:02, Michael Koch wrote: On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 06:26:44PM +0200, Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel wrote: Le Wed, 05 Aug 2009 15:52:34 +0200, Matthias Klose a écrit : On 05.08.2009 17:00, Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel wrote: hello as I am working on my remotetea package, I build it using t

Re: javadoc problem with default-jdk

2009-08-05 Thread Matthias Klose
On 05.08.2009 18:26, Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel wrote: Le Wed, 05 Aug 2009 15:52:34 +0200, Matthias Klose a écrit : On 05.08.2009 17:00, Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel wrote: hello as I am working on my remotetea package, I build it using the pbuilder. and it seems that depending on default-jdk i

Re: javadoc problem with default-jdk

2009-08-05 Thread Michael Koch
On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 06:26:44PM +0200, Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel wrote: > Le Wed, 05 Aug 2009 15:52:34 +0200, > Matthias Klose a écrit : > > > On 05.08.2009 17:00, Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel wrote: > > > hello as I am working on my remotetea package, I build it using the > > > pbuilder. > > > > > >

Re: Any plan to update java3d

2009-08-05 Thread Jonny Lamb
On Wed, Aug 05, 22:31:08 +0530, Onkar Shinde wrote: > 1. Remove dfsg from version. As long as the upstream tarball which is uploaded does not contain any non-DFSG files, sure. Perhaps it's just the CVS snapshot with these weird files which I removed. > 2. Use upstream source zip for version 1.5.2

Re: Any plan to update java3d

2009-08-05 Thread Jonny Lamb
On Wed, Aug 05, 22:14:53 +0530, Onkar Shinde wrote: > Are you referring to following entry in changelog? > * debian/rules: Remove unzipsfx executables from orig.tar.gz. > > As I said, current upstream (1.5.2) source zip does not contain any > non-DFSG-Free files. It does not contain any class or

Re: Any plan to update java3d

2009-08-05 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 10:23 PM, Jonny Lamb wrote: > On Wed, Aug 05, 22:14:53 +0530, Onkar Shinde wrote: >> Are you referring to following entry in changelog? >>   * debian/rules: Remove unzipsfx executables from orig.tar.gz. >> >> As I said, current upstream (1.5.2) source zip does not contain any

Re: Any plan to update java3d

2009-08-05 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 9:02 PM, Jonny Lamb wrote: > On Fri, Jun 26, 16:53:10 +0530, Onkar Shinde wrote: >> 1. Why are we trying to build CVS version instead of latest stable version? > > That's what Petter did initially, and I didn't look at what was > available upstream. > >> 2. The version number

Re: javadoc problem with default-jdk

2009-08-05 Thread Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel
Le Wed, 05 Aug 2009 15:52:34 +0200, Matthias Klose a écrit : > On 05.08.2009 17:00, Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel wrote: > > hello as I am working on my remotetea package, I build it using the > > pbuilder. > > > > and it seems that depending on default-jdk is not enought to produce > > good documentat

Re: javadoc problem with default-jdk

2009-08-05 Thread Matthias Klose
On 05.08.2009 17:00, Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel wrote: hello as I am working on my remotetea package, I build it using the pbuilder. and it seems that depending on default-jdk is not enought to produce good documentation with javadoc. Indeed it do not find the documentation for standard classes of

Re: Any plan to update java3d

2009-08-05 Thread Jonny Lamb
On Fri, Jun 26, 16:53:10 +0530, Onkar Shinde wrote: > 1. Why are we trying to build CVS version instead of latest stable version? That's what Petter did initially, and I didn't look at what was available upstream. > 2. The version number in the changelog says dfsg, but there is no > readme file j

javadoc problem with default-jdk

2009-08-05 Thread Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel
hello as I am working on my remotetea package, I build it using the pbuilder. and it seems that depending on default-jdk is not enought to produce good documentation with javadoc. Indeed it do not find the documentation for standard classes of java. what must I add as build dependency to produce

RFS: remotetea - Sun ONC/RPC support for Java

2009-08-05 Thread Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel
Dear debian-java readers, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "remotetea". * Package name: remotetea Version : 1.0.7-1 * URL : http://remotetea.sourceforge.net/ * License : LGPL Section : java It builds these binary packages: remotetea - Sun ONC