Re: For those who care about batik

2008-10-06 Thread Vincent Fourmond
Sylvestre Ledru wrote: >> Could you check all that, please ? > fop v0.95 needs Batik 1.7. I agree that it should go to experimental > first. > It seems that it needs this version for WMF stuff (at least). > I also changed gcj to openjdk6. Perfect. I added a runtime dependency on batik 1.7 too

Re: For those who care about batik

2008-10-06 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
> > It is available here: > > For the compiled version: http://sylvestre.ledru.info/debian/fop/ > > or > > svn://svn.debian.org/pkg-java/trunk/fop > > I'm just wondering about some points: I seem to recall that the point > of getting an updated version was that older versions seemed to work >

Re: Debian featuring http://java.sun.com/products/jimi/ ?

2008-10-06 Thread Eric Lavarde - Debian
Hi Steffen, I'd like to say "Free Jimi!". Seriously, this library is under "Sun Microsystems, Inc. Binary Code License Agreement", hence not free, not even free enough for "non-free" because the license forbids redistribution. The program you're interested to package, if it's distributed with the

Re: Debian featuring http://java.sun.com/products/jimi/ ?

2008-10-06 Thread Paul Cager
Steffen Moeller wrote: > Hello, > > I know I should make this a RFP, but I am a bit lost > about what the perfect package name would > possibly be. > > A program that I am interested to package comes > with the jimi.jar. Is there a way to have this > Java Image I/O Debianised? > > Many thanks an