Re: RFS : Mina

2008-08-01 Thread Ben Finney
Matthew Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > - changelog: since it's not been uploaded to Debian yet, can you > combine the changelog entries into just one. Pretty much changelog > entries should correspond to uploads (and obviously the debian > revision will be 1) Didn't we just have a disc

building openjdk-6 for m68k

2008-08-01 Thread Matthias Klose
the openjdk-6 6b11-4 should build on m68k. It may take a few weeks, but I currently don't see any issue with it. If you do so, please keep the build tree, so that the testsuite can be run, after the build finishes (taking some more weeks to finish). thanks, Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: RFS : sqlline

2008-08-01 Thread Damien Raude-Morvan
Hi, Le Saturday 02 August 2008 00:40:41 Matthew Johnson, vous avez écrit : > I've also had a look at sqlline: > > - if (as README.Debian suggests) it is only useful with a jdbc driver > it should probably depend (or at the very least recommend) a jdbc > driver. I'd Depend on all of them as alte

Re: RFS : Mina

2008-08-01 Thread Damien Raude-Morvan
Le Saturday 02 August 2008 00:40:41 Matthew Johnson, vous avez écrit : > On Tue Jul 29 19:29, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: > > I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. > > Hi Damian, > > I've had a look over your package and may be able to sponsor it. I have > a few comments first tho

Re: RFS : Mina

2008-08-01 Thread Matthew Johnson
On Tue Jul 29 19:29, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: > > I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. > Hi Damian, I've had a look over your package and may be able to sponsor it. I have a few comments first though, and I agree with the comments on short descriptions. - changelog: since

Re: RFS: libnanoxml2-java

2008-08-01 Thread Matthew Johnson
Hi, sorry I've been silent for a while, I've been a bit busy. Everything looks good now, and I'd be happy to upload, _but_: you now have: Suggests: nanoxml2-java-doc whereas you actually want: Suggests: libnanoxml2-java-doc Matt -- Matthew Johnson signature.asc Description: Digital signat

Re: Review wanted on a package

2008-08-01 Thread Matthew Johnson
On Mon Jul 28 20:12, Iustin Pop wrote: > Hello, > > I'm trying to package protobuf (http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/). > The source package will generate C++, Python and Java bindings. Since > I'm not knowledgeable with Java, and even less with Java packaging, > could someone please look over th