Re: Proper way to specify Java build-dep

2008-05-05 Thread Kumar Appaiah
Dear Adam, On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 12:23:11PM -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote: > Just curious, what will happen regarding testing transitions in the > meantime? And long-term, can I assume that the package will build and > transition as soon as the infrastructure is in place, without another > uplo

Re: Proper way to specify Java build-dep

2008-05-05 Thread Adam C Powell IV
On Mon, 2008-05-05 at 16:58 +0200, Michael Koch wrote: > On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 10:23:41AM -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote: > > Greetings, > > > > My package babel recently closed bug 477845 by changing a build > > dependency from java-gcj-compat to default-jdk-builddep. Unfortunately, > > this ma

Re: Proper way to specify Java build-dep

2008-05-05 Thread Michael Koch
On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 10:23:41AM -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote: > Greetings, > > My package babel recently closed bug 477845 by changing a build > dependency from java-gcj-compat to default-jdk-builddep. Unfortunately, > this made it FTBFS on hppa, s390, arm and alpha, where before it built > e

Proper way to specify Java build-dep

2008-05-05 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Greetings, My package babel recently closed bug 477845 by changing a build dependency from java-gcj-compat to default-jdk-builddep. Unfortunately, this made it FTBFS on hppa, s390, arm and alpha, where before it built everywhere except arm. What is the right thing to do in this situation? Do I