Hi,
Michael Koch said:
> I'm currently working on a proposal for cleaning up the virtual package
> chaos. Please give me some more days for this.
Fair enough, let's consider as a warm up for the discussion that will come
once you'll show your proposal ;-)
Thanks, Eric
--
You don't need to CC m
On Wed Jan 30 14:20, Eric Lavarde - Debian wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Michael Koch said:
> > On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 09:32:46AM +0100, Eric Lavarde - Debian wrote:
> >> - the Java Policy should state that a Java package should depend on
> >> java2-runtime only if the packager expects its program to work wit
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 02:20:59PM +0100, Eric Lavarde - Debian wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Michael Koch said:
> > On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 09:32:46AM +0100, Eric Lavarde - Debian wrote:
> >> - the Java Policy should state that a Java package should depend on
> >> java2-runtime only if the packager expects it
Hi,
Michael Koch said:
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 09:32:46AM +0100, Eric Lavarde - Debian wrote:
>> - the Java Policy should state that a Java package should depend on
>> java2-runtime only if the packager expects its program to work with a
>> classpath-alike implementation of Java.
>> (what about
Eric Lavarde wrote:
Hi Andrew,
Andrew Haley wrote:
I guess it depends on whether the program fails because a particular
runtime has bugs or because the program depends on something it shouldn't
use, such as com.sun.* classes. We're pretty complete with respect to
1.4,
so I'd like to know wha
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 09:32:46AM +0100, Eric Lavarde - Debian wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> OK, second try at getting a common understanding:
>
> - the Java Policy should state that a Java package should depend on
> java2-runtime only if the packager expects its program to work with a
> classpath-
Hi everybody,
OK, second try at getting a common understanding:
- the Java Policy should state that a Java package should depend on
java2-runtime only if the packager expects its program to work with a
classpath-alike implementation of Java.
(what about IcedTea then?)
- in the words of Michael:
7 matches
Mail list logo