On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 02:20:59PM +0100, Eric Lavarde - Debian wrote: > Hi, > > Michael Koch said: > > On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 09:32:46AM +0100, Eric Lavarde - Debian wrote: > >> - the Java Policy should state that a Java package should depend on > >> java2-runtime only if the packager expects its program to work with a > >> classpath-alike implementation of Java. > >> (what about IcedTea then?) > > > > IMO all java packages should depend on java2-runtime as second > > alternative and bugs should be filed against runtimes not working > > properly with a package. > Oookay... Looks like we're doing circles here. How do we progress now? > I'm fine with both options, but I feel that we need a consensus within > debian-java, and that we don't have it yet.
I'm currently working on a proposal for cleaning up the virtual package chaos. Please give me some more days for this. Cheers, Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
