On 3/29/07, Paul Cager <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
By the way, I probably haven't made it clear that I was just asking out
of idle curiosity. I'm not intending to package it myself. So leap right
in if you're interested!
Well, I think everybody understood you were ready to do the job :-D
Marcus Better wrote:
> Paul Cager wrote:
>> The maven2 distribution contains about 7 wagon jars (wagon-file,
>> wagon-http-shared etc). What would be the best way to package this:
>
> I suggest one source file and several binary packages. This is because
> (a) the top-level svn directory has a pr
On 3/29/07, Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 09:56:47AM +0100, Paul Cager wrote:
> Michael Koch wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 11:29:35PM +0100, Paul Cager wrote:
> >> The maven2 distribution contains about 7 wagon jars (wagon-file,
> >> wagon-http-shared etc).
Paul Cager wrote:
> The maven2 distribution contains about 7 wagon jars (wagon-file,
> wagon-http-shared etc). What would be the best way to package this:
I suggest one source file and several binary packages. This is because
(a) the top-level svn directory has a project file listing the other
su
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 09:56:47AM +0100, Paul Cager wrote:
> Michael Koch wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 11:29:35PM +0100, Paul Cager wrote:
> >> The maven2 distribution contains about 7 wagon jars (wagon-file,
> >> wagon-http-shared etc). What would be the best way to package this:
> >>
> >>
Michael Koch wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 11:29:35PM +0100, Paul Cager wrote:
>> The maven2 distribution contains about 7 wagon jars (wagon-file,
>> wagon-http-shared etc). What would be the best way to package this:
>>
>> A) Seven source packages (and hence seven binary packages).
>> B) On
6 matches
Mail list logo
