Michael Koch wrote: > On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 11:29:35PM +0100, Paul Cager wrote: >> The maven2 distribution contains about 7 wagon jars (wagon-file, >> wagon-http-shared etc). What would be the best way to package this: >> >> A) Seven source packages (and hence seven binary packages). >> B) One source package generating seven binary packages. >> C) One source package generating one binary package (one big jar). >> D) Doesn't matter / something else. >> >> I'm rather in favour of the first option. What's the general view? > > Are all source packages normally release in sync? If yes I would prefer > one big source package which includes the tarballs of all releases and > builds either seven binary packages or one binary package with 7 jars. > I think I would prefer the later one.
Upstream do not release source tarballs - access is by svn. It looks to me as though all of the Jars are released in sync (although I may be a bit confused, since the ibiblio repos has version 1.0-alpha-4, and the maven download contains 1.0-beta-2, and some things have been renamed). I guess if we produce one source package then we should package _all_ of wagon, not just the bits needed by maven. It don't think this will be a problem, as it doesn't look like it will pull in any additional dependencies. Regards, Paul -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
