Mark Wielaard writes:
> Hi Matthias,
>
> On Thu, 2007-01-11 at 21:11 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > The idea was to make the -doc packages depend on other -doc packages
> > so that references to other packages can be resolved; unfortunately
> > gjdoc doesn't support that yet.
>
> What would you
Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
>> *Also because it would make the danger of bit-rot visible.
>
> English problem here, I don't understand this sentence :'(
I mean that there will be a visible difference between these cases:
(a) A package that has gone a long time without activity because it works
well, an
On 1/12/07, Marcus Better <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> As you mentionned, a lot of packages does not need a lot of attention.
> Why do you want to orphan a package that could be just here because a
> lot of people use it and it does not need upload!
*Because at a certain po
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 12:54:22PM +0100, Marcus Better wrote:
> Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
>
> > On 1/12/07, Marcus Better <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Michael Koch wrote:
> >> > Please just add yourself. Wolfgang is MIA currently but thats not yet a
> >> > reason to remove them.
> >>
> >> What _is
On 1/12/07, Marcus Better <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
[...]
> I just can tell he sent me a mail less then two month
> ago: he is ok but has no time to dedicate to Debian
> at the moment.
I'm glad to hear that. Do you know if he would mind to
be removed from Uploaders? He d
>> Stefan hasn't retired.
>
> I take his statement to mean that he has stopped maintaining those
> packages,
> and no longer wishes to be a co-maintainer.
>
>> but just does not have the time at the moment.
When I was preparing a new upload of BCEL I asked Stefan if he would like
me to remove his
Thank you for your response. Please don't reply to this message - it is an
automated response and your reply will not be received.
If you have a question for eBay Customer Support, please visit the following
eBay Help page. This page will help you locate the answer to your question, or
assist
Hi Matthias,
On Thu, 2007-01-11 at 21:11 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> The idea was to make the -doc packages depend on other -doc packages
> so that references to other packages can be resolved; unfortunately
> gjdoc doesn't support that yet.
What would you need from gjdoc to support 'that'?
Co
Eric Lavarde - Debian wrote:
> 1. you say twice in your email that Debian has a Java quality issue. Can
> you please be more specific, I don't understand which issue(s) you're
> aiming at?
One more thing: Don't get me wrong, there are many parts of the Java effort
that are very well maintained, su
Hi,
Marcus Better said:
> Matthias Klose wrote:
>>> How come? I thought we put api docs in the -doc package, if there is
>>> one.
>
>> exactly, but into the /usr/share/doc/$package/api directory, not into
>> the /usr/share/doc/$package-doc/api directory.
> [...]
> Is it really better to put the do
Eric Lavarde - Debian wrote:
> 1. you say twice in your email that Debian has a Java quality issue. Can
> you please be more specific,
Yes, I can give examples, but not until next week though. It has to do with
bugs, even important ones, not getting attention. For a quick idea, look at
the history
Hi Marcus,
I'd like to raise three things:
1. you say twice in your email that Debian has a Java quality issue. Can
you please be more specific, I don't understand which issue(s) you're
aiming at?
2. perhaps a step to make those issues visible and more easily
"addressable" by the "pkg-java" team
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 09:58:46PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Steve Langasek writes:
> > On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 02:16:54AM -0800, Peter Ronnquist wrote:
> > > It seems like eclipse will not be part of the etch release. Is this
> > > a mistake?
> >
> > No, it is not; it's a direct consequence
Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> On 1/12/07, Marcus Better <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Michael Koch wrote:
>> > Please just add yourself. Wolfgang is MIA currently but thats not yet a
>> > reason to remove them.
>>
>> What _is_ a reason to remove someone? A package maintained by a MIA would
>> normally b
Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> As you mentionned, a lot of packages does not need a lot of attention.
> Why do you want to orphan a package that could be just here because a
> lot of people use it and it does not need upload!
*Because at a certain point it will need attention, perhaps urgently, and
then
Matthias Klose wrote:
>> How come? I thought we put api docs in the -doc package, if there is
>> one.
> exactly, but into the /usr/share/doc/$package/api directory, not into
> the /usr/share/doc/$package-doc/api directory.
Oh, I wasn't aware of that. I've been doing it the other way around. But i
On 1/12/07, Marcus Better <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Michael Koch wrote:
> Please just add yourself. Wolfgang is MIA currently but thats not yet a
> reason to remove them.
What _is_ a reason to remove someone? A package maintained by a MIA would
normally be orphaned. It's easy enough to add the
On 1/9/07, Marcus Better <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Stefan Gybas wrote:
>> The Maintainer has ultimate responsibility for the package,
> What if this person becomes MIA?
One of the Uploaders will notice and take over the package and replace the
Maintainer, which would be an improvement over the
On 1/11/07, Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 06:51:08PM -, Paul Cager wrote:
> Regarding the packaging of the new upstream version of checkstyle. As it
> is a library, should I rename the binary package to libcheckstyle-java, or
> would this cause far too many p
Marcus Better writes:
> Matthias Klose wrote:
> >> which seems more sensible to me. Should I change it to
> >> /usr/share/doc/$package/api? I assume I should also create a doc-base.
>
> > where $package is the name of the library package, not the name of the
> > doc package (if there exists an ext
On 1/7/07, Paul Cager <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
Please can I apply to join the Java Packaging Project. I've opened an
account on alioth ("paulcager-guest"), and I'm subscribed to
pkg-java-maintainers and debian-java.
Welcome to the project, many thanks for your help,
--
Arnaud Van
Michael Koch wrote:
> Please just add yourself. Wolfgang is MIA currently but thats not yet a
> reason to remove them.
What _is_ a reason to remove someone? A package maintained by a MIA would
normally be orphaned. It's easy enough to add the person back when (s)he
starts working again.
In the sp
Matthias Klose wrote:
>> which seems more sensible to me. Should I change it to
>> /usr/share/doc/$package/api? I assume I should also create a doc-base.
> where $package is the name of the library package, not the name of the
> doc package (if there exists an extra -doc package).
How come? I tho
23 matches
Mail list logo
