Marcus Better wrote:
> Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
>> It's a good idea to remove generated javadoc and jar files and classes.
>
> Well, let's agree to disagree. :)
>
>> They can be removed to use less space and be sure not to include code
>> that has been build with non free dependencies.
>
> The spac
On 12/12/06, Marcus Better <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> It's a good idea to remove generated javadoc and jar files and classes.
Well, let's agree to disagree. :)
;-)
> They can be removed to use less space and be sure not to include code
> that has been build with non f
Hello,
> > They can be removed to use less space and be sure not to include code
> > that has been build with non free dependencies.
>
> The space argument is rather weak IMHO, and certainly shouldn't warrant
> rebuilding a source tarball only for that purpose. (Or do you have a source
> for th
Arnaud Vandyck writes:
> On 12/6/06, Marcus Better <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Benjamin Mesing wrote:
> > > Generally speaking yes, but the Debian Java Policy suggests, that class
> > > files should be removed from upstream release [1].
> >
> > That advice is plain wrong. (And it's not par
On 12/6/06, Marcus Better <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Benjamin Mesing wrote:
> Generally speaking yes, but the Debian Java Policy suggests, that class
> files should be removed from upstream release [1].
That advice is plain wrong. (And it's not part of the actual Java policy as
the page says.)
Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> It's a good idea to remove generated javadoc and jar files and classes.
Well, let's agree to disagree. :)
> They can be removed to use less space and be sure not to include code
> that has been build with non free dependencies.
The space argument is rather weak IMHO, and
6 matches
Mail list logo
