Hello, > > They can be removed to use less space and be sure not to include code > > that has been build with non free dependencies. > > The space argument is rather weak IMHO, and certainly shouldn't warrant > rebuilding a source tarball only for that purpose. (Or do you have a source > for this advice?) And avoiding to install pre-built binaries is easy.
I have another argument for repackaging in this particular case: The upstream zip contains a jar, which in turn contains the source code of the program. However, I need to patch the source contained in the jar. This is quite painful in terms of applying those patches. Regards Ben -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
