Re: Request for checking: Java library tagsoup (ITP #359170)

Marcus, Many thanks for this - exactly what I wanted. I think I have rather heavily cut-and-pasted without understanding all of the underlying details. I'll follow up your ideas below and re-package. Just a couple of questions, as annotated below, if you don't mind... Marcus Better wrote: I

Re: ITP: openjdk-compiler

Hi, On Tue, 2006-11-14 at 16:53 +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote: > On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 03:55:24PM +0100, Marcus Better wrote: > > > I have now determined that it can build using itself as compiler > > > (If I make a preliminary version bootstrapped with binary sun javac). > > > > Then it would hav

Re: JDK is GPL now! a package in main requested

Hi, On Thu, 2006-11-16 at 09:40 +, Mr. Demeanour wrote: > > See planet.classpath.org . Many of us are really happy about it, and > > have begun playing around with Sun's code. I believe the fun hack for > > today is making cacao work with Sun's ME libraries, there have been a > > few such thin

Re: Request for checking: Java library tagsoup (ITP #359170)

Hi! thanks for your work, here are a few comments: debian/control: You are using ant-trax and xalan2 in the rules file, so add ant-optional and libxalan2-java to build-depends. (Did you build it with pbuilder?) AFAIU cdbs calls ant in the "clean" target. So it seems ant has to go into Build-Depe

Tomcat5.5 bugfix package - please test

Hi, I've prepared an updated Tomcat5.5 package which fixes bugs #395167, #397996, #393224, #398044, and a few minor issues. This version should work with java-gcj-compat. Due to the number of changes, I would appreciate if a few people could help me test it before upload. You can find the package