Re: WTF: All those eclipse packages (and som gcj questions)

2005-12-17 Thread Andreas Pakulat
On 17.12.05 16:45:08, Stephan Michels wrote: > On 12/17/05, Andreas Pakulat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 17.12.05 14:46:52, Stephan Michels wrote: > > > On 12/17/05, Andreas Pakulat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: > > > > > > org.tigris.subversio

Re: WTF: All those eclipse packages (and som gcj questions)

2005-12-17 Thread Stephan Michels
On 12/17/05, Andreas Pakulat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 17.12.05 14:46:52, Stephan Michels wrote: > > On 12/17/05, Andreas Pakulat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: > > > > > org.tigris.subversion.javahl.SVNClient not found in > > > > > gnu.gcj.runtim

Re: WTF: All those eclipse packages (and som gcj questions)

2005-12-17 Thread Andreas Pakulat
On 17.12.05 14:46:52, Stephan Michels wrote: > On 12/17/05, Andreas Pakulat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: > > > > org.tigris.subversion.javahl.SVNClient not found in > > > > gnu.gcj.runtime.SystemClassLoader{urls=[file:/usr/lib/eclipse/startup.jar], > > >

Re: WTF: All those eclipse packages (and som gcj questions)

2005-12-17 Thread Andreas Pakulat
On 17.12.05 15:47:15, Mark Wielaard wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, 2005-12-17 at 16:35 +0100, Michael Koch wrote: > > > Also the generics don't work when using the java-gcj-compat VM as you > > > suggested for beeing able to use ecj as compiler. > > > > All language extensions from Java 5.0 work with G

Re: WTF: All those eclipse packages (and som gcj questions)

2005-12-17 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi, On Sat, 2005-12-17 at 16:35 +0100, Michael Koch wrote: > > Also the generics don't work when using the java-gcj-compat VM as you > > suggested for beeing able to use ecj as compiler. > > All language extensions from Java 5.0 work with GCJ 4.0. The main problem > is just that you cant use the

Re: WTF: All those eclipse packages (and som gcj questions)

2005-12-17 Thread Michael Koch
On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 02:36:22PM +0100, Andreas Pakulat wrote: > On 17.12.05 14:47:11, Michael Koch wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 01:26:07PM +0100, Andreas Pakulat wrote: > > > On 17.12.05 13:54:55, Michael Koch wrote: > > > Anyway, somethings not working here as expected. Having > > > JAVA_

Re: WTF: All those eclipse packages (and som gcj questions)

2005-12-17 Thread Stephan Michels
On 12/17/05, Andreas Pakulat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.tigris.subversion.javahl.SVNClient > > > not found in > > > gnu.gcj.runtime.SystemClassLoader{urls=[file:/usr/lib/eclipse/startup.jar], > > > parent=gnu.gcj.runtime.ExtensionClassLoader{urls=[],

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: ftp.debian.org: orig tarballs get lost when moving packages from contrib to main]

2005-12-17 Thread Michael Koch
On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 02:28:49PM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Michael Koch wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > I filed the attached bug report because the orig tarballs of tomcat5 and > > libxalan2-java are missing in the main section of the archi

Re: WTF: All those eclipse packages (and som gcj questions)

2005-12-17 Thread Andreas Pakulat
On 17.12.05 14:47:11, Michael Koch wrote: > On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 01:26:07PM +0100, Andreas Pakulat wrote: > > On 17.12.05 13:54:55, Michael Koch wrote: > > Anyway, somethings not working here as expected. Having > > JAVA_HOME=/usr/lib/jvm/java/gcj is _much_ slower (in startup) than using > > SUN

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: ftp.debian.org: orig tarballs get lost when moving packages from contrib to main]

2005-12-17 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Michael Koch wrote: > Hello all, > > I filed the attached bug report because the orig tarballs of tomcat5 and > libxalan2-java are missing in the main section of the archive. They are > present in the contrib section bug 'apt-cache source ...' fails b

Re: Java WSDP on Debian?

2005-12-17 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tom wrote: > Hey ho, Ho hey ;-) > For school, I have to (learn how to) use Sun's WSDP [1]. I must admit > I was hoping for the WSDP installer to be able to recognize the > beautifully packaged Debian installation of Tomcat 5 as a valid web > containe

Re: WTF: All those eclipse packages (and som gcj questions)

2005-12-17 Thread Michael Koch
On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 01:26:07PM +0100, Andreas Pakulat wrote: > On 17.12.05 13:54:55, Michael Koch wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 12:42:36PM +0100, Andreas Pakulat wrote: > > > > Only when using GCJ to run Eclipse and eclipse-ecj-gcj is installed. > > > > > > Ok, got that installed. > > >

Re: WTF: All those eclipse packages (and som gcj questions)

2005-12-17 Thread Andreas Pakulat
On 17.12.05 13:54:55, Michael Koch wrote: > On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 12:42:36PM +0100, Andreas Pakulat wrote: > > > Only when using GCJ to run Eclipse and eclipse-ecj-gcj is installed. > > > > Ok, got that installed. > > > > > Eclipse just calls the main ECJ class inside itself and SUN is not > >

Re: WTF: All those eclipse packages (and som gcj questions)

2005-12-17 Thread Michael Koch
On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 12:42:36PM +0100, Andreas Pakulat wrote: > > Only when using GCJ to run Eclipse and eclipse-ecj-gcj is installed. > > Ok, got that installed. > > > Eclipse just calls the main ECJ class inside itself and SUN is not > > capable of using the native jars. > > Hmm, so when ru

Re: WTF: All those eclipse packages (and som gcj questions)

2005-12-17 Thread Andreas Pakulat
On 17.12.05 13:28:27, Michael Koch wrote: > On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 12:09:08PM +0100, Andreas Pakulat wrote: > > On 17.12.05 12:20:53, Michael Koch wrote: > > > On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 01:59:54AM +0100, Andreas Pakulat wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I do find it really great to have eclipse in

Re: WTF: All those eclipse packages (and som gcj questions)

2005-12-17 Thread Michael Koch
On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 12:09:08PM +0100, Andreas Pakulat wrote: > On 17.12.05 12:20:53, Michael Koch wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 01:59:54AM +0100, Andreas Pakulat wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I do find it really great to have eclipse in debian (finally). Only I'm > > > a little confused by

Re: WTF: All those eclipse packages (and som gcj questions)

2005-12-17 Thread Andreas Pakulat
On 17.12.05 12:20:53, Michael Koch wrote: > On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 01:59:54AM +0100, Andreas Pakulat wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I do find it really great to have eclipse in debian (finally). Only I'm > > a little confused by all those new packages. So here come my questions, > > please someone shed s

Re: WTF: All those eclipse packages (and som gcj questions)

2005-12-17 Thread Michael Koch
On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 01:59:54AM +0100, Andreas Pakulat wrote: > Hi, > > I do find it really great to have eclipse in debian (finally). Only I'm > a little confused by all those new packages. So here come my questions, > please someone shed some light on this: > > 1. Do I understand correctly t