Hallo Roman,
* Roman Kennke wrote:
>the eclipse-platform package seems to be the only eclipse-related
>package that directly depends on non-free stuff, holding all the eclipse
>packages in contrib.
Nope: libswt2.1-motif-java also depends on a non-free lib (motif) and I
don't plan to split the pac
> > The only options I can think of are to make multiple packages, some
> > with signed jars and some with unsigned jars, or to provide both
> > jars in the same package. Note that this is not just a matter of
> > bein signed by the Legion of the Bouncy Castle; the certificate they
> > use was obta
Hi list,
the eclipse-platform package seems to be the only eclipse-related
package that directly depends on non-free stuff, holding all the eclipse
packages in contrib.
Is there a specific reason, why eclipse-platform does not depend on
kaffe? I'm running eclipse from unstable together with kaffe
Hi all,
Thanks to Guillaume Rousse fron JPackage project, we've got a mailing
list for our common java packaging discussion set up on
https://www.zarb.org/mailman/listinfo/cojapas .
The idea behind it is to add a discussion forum to the Common Java
Packaging wiki on http://java.debian.net/inde
Hallo Arnaud,
* Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
>> BTW: I'm still looking for a sponsort for this release!
>I'll try to upload and build it tomorrow...
Thanks a lot!
Jan
--
Jan Schulz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Wer nicht fragt, bleibt dumm."
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTE
On Tuesday 06 April 2004 15:57, Tobias Eichert wrote:
> Hello list,
> I'm some kind of confused about the naming schemes within the gcj* packages
> and kaffe. 'gcj-3.3' and 'libgcj4' provide their own java/javac executables
> (actually they are wrappers for gcj's executables). I guess kaffe (which
Hello list,
I'm some kind of confused about the naming schemes within the gcj* packages
and kaffe. 'gcj-3.3' and 'libgcj4' provide their own java/javac executables
(actually they are wrappers for gcj's executables). I guess kaffe (which
seems to be only in the unstable branch for now) provides i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jan Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hallo Hein,
>
> * Hein Meling wrote:
>> Anyone else have this problem? Is there a known solution? I could
>>not find anything on google.
>
> known (have a look in BTS of eclipse) and fixed, but not yet uploa
Hallo Hein,
* Hein Meling wrote:
> Anyone else have this problem? Is there a known solution? I could
>not find anything on google.
known (have a look in BTS of eclipse) and fixed, but not yet uploaded,
due to no sponsor. The source of this bug is the ant 1.5 -> 1.6
switch, which changed the ja
Hi *,
For a while I've been unable to use the built-in ant editor in
eclipse. Trying to open a build.xml file, eclipse reports an error
"Unable to create part: Ant Editor".
The log file contains the attached exception, which I believe is
related to the problem. I also think that maybe the n
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Charles Fry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The only options I can think of are to make multiple packages, some
> with signed jars and some with unsigned jars, or to provide both jars
> in the same package. Note that this is not just a matter of bein
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ean Schuessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I will either merge it back into Kaffe or I will generate Javadoc for
> all of the Kaffe classes. That should bring it up above the cutoff
> and still represents a useful addition to the package.
How wil
12 matches
Mail list logo
