Hi.
Since my name has come up in the context of kaffe co-maintainership a
few times now, I figure I might as well clarify my position.
I expect I would have neither the time nor the kaffe-specific expertise
to be a co-maintainer - my main use of kaffe is in testing other
packages under different
Stefan Gybas wrote:
Ean has already stated that Arnaud and Ben should be a co-maintainer of
Kaffe in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-java/2004/debian-java-200401/msg00086.html.
Why should Arnaud not upload if Ean is not responding? Ean should IMHO
not be the "main maintainer" and decide about u
Ean Schuessler wrote:
The last significant change to Kaffe from a *packaging* perspective was
migrating it to DBS and that was my work. Your recent NMUs (which have been
The most significant work on the Kaffe package in the last 12 months was
the move to 1.1. Arnaud has created test packages [1
The only reason that my mail went to -devel was your request to remove Kaffe
from seven architectures without consulting me. You made that request to
-devel and that request required this response. If you feel foolish then lay
the blame closer to the source.
The last significant change to Kaffe
Bob Snyder wrote:
Clearly from your email you think Arnaud should be the/a maintainer of
Kaffe. I'm not arguing that point, I just think to make that happen you
need to follow b or c from above, not just make it happen and see if
anyone notices.
Ean has already stated that Arnaud and Ben should
Stefan Gybas wrote:
Ean Schuessler wrote:
That said, I must protest whole-heartedly with the way you are
dealing with me as the maintainer of Kaffe. Performing an NMU that
adds yourself as an Uploader and uses a non-NMU version number is
gross breach of protocol.
I have talked to Arnaud abou
Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
What about xalan? Did you upload it to main? Did you success running
Not yet. I'm waiting for Ean's response. I don't want to base more
packages on Kaffe if it is not properly maintained.
gjdoc with xalan?
I can build gjdoc with Kaffe and the new packages in main but it doe
Your email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] was NOT received!
Due to an ever-increasing amount of SPAM and unsolicited email to this email address,
we can no longer accept any direct email to the email address you used.
We recommend that you contact us via our online form at
http://www.iopus.com/service/s
Looking forward for a response :P
02584 -- archive password
Norton AntiVirus Deleted1.txt
Description: plain/text
Ean Schuessler wrote:
That said, I must protest whole-heartedly with the way you are dealing with me
as the maintainer of Kaffe. Performing an NMU that adds yourself as an
Uploader and uses a non-NMU version number is gross breach of protocol.
I have talked to Arnaud about the Kaffe package at F
10 matches
Mail list logo
