Re: bugwatcher problems

2004-01-19 Thread Juergen Kreileder
Grzegorz B. Prokopski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [jni: fatal error (Local reference capacity exceeded)] > > Java specification allows programs to assume that maximum 16 local > references are available This comes from the JNI (Java Native Interface) spec. VMs have to ensure that at least 16 l

Re: bugwatcher problems

2004-01-19 Thread Grzegorz B. Prokopski
e to ask, if I could be of any help for you. You're also welcomed to mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cheers, Grzegorz B. Prokopski [*] I don't want to upload new sablevm every few days to conserve autobuilders. Don't believe the svn numbers you see. The

Re: Let Jikes (finally) go into testing on its own...

2004-01-19 Thread Grzegorz B. Prokopski
W liście z pon, 19-01-2004, godz. 21:44, Adam Majer pisze: > I'm not sure how long it will take these wrappers to dissapear from > sid by themselves (ie. not build from jikes source). I'm guessing > a few days at least. Someone could of course file bugs against > ftp-master to get them removed, bu

Jikes wrappers removed...

2004-01-19 Thread Adam Majer
Hi, I put all the jikes wrappers and their debhelper stuff in http://people.debian.org/~adamm/jikes-wrappers/ so you can just download the relevent parts and include them. Please keep the priority levels for the javac alternative. - Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a

Re: Let Jikes (finally) go into testing on its own...

2004-01-19 Thread Adam Majer
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 11:51:50PM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: > Adam Majer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > It doesn't really matter to me. I just need everyone to agree on this > > so that the wrappers don't simply dissapear. Grzegorz (SableVM) surely > > will agree. gij will probably have lit

Re: Let Jikes (finally) go into testing on its own...

2004-01-19 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
Adam Majer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It doesn't really matter to me. I just need everyone to agree on this > so that the wrappers don't simply dissapear. Grzegorz (SableVM) surely > will agree. gij will probably have little problem with this either. > > I just need a yes from both Ean (Kaffe)

Bug#227587: [PROPOSAL] Java library dependencies

2004-01-19 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
Stefan Gybas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Library packages never depended on a JVM (virtual package > java-virtual-machine), just the core classes. The definition of > java*-runtime means just the core classes, no JVM. Ola has clarified > this in > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2002/debian

Re: Let Jikes (finally) go into testing on its own...

2004-01-19 Thread Ben Burton
> It depends. If you want to make sure that all unstable users will > get the wrapper updated - you'll have to add 2: epoh to current > version. > > However, as I said, it's unstable after all and the wrappers don't seem > to be changing their content anyway, so IMO you might as well decide to >

Re: Let Jikes (finally) go into testing on its own...

2004-01-19 Thread Grzegorz B. Prokopski
W liście z pon, 19-01-2004, godz. 10:34, John Leuner pisze: > > I just need a yes from both Ean (Kaffe) and John (Classpath). I can upload > > a new version of jikes tomorrow if everyone agrees. > > I can add the jikes-classpath script to the classpath package. good! > It wasn't clear from the d

Re: Let Jikes (finally) go into testing on its own...

2004-01-19 Thread John Leuner
> I just need a yes from both Ean (Kaffe) and John (Classpath). I can upload > a new version of jikes tomorrow if everyone agrees. I can add the jikes-classpath script to the classpath package. It wasn't clear from the discussions exactly what version changes are required What versioning changes

question about tomcat

2004-01-19 Thread Mariano García
Hi all, I want to ask you if there is any way to get tomcat does not start automatically when linux starts. I know I can delete all /etc/rcx.d/S20tomcat4 links, but, there is another way? (as editing parameter start_at_boot in /etc/tomcat/default, for example). Regards, Mariano. signature.asc D

Re: Let Jikes (finally) go into testing on its own...

2004-01-19 Thread Dalibor Topic
Hi Adam, Adam Majer wrote: I guess if we can't work something out, we'll just have to fix kaffe :) I guess the simplest approach in this direction is to ask developers on those architectures to help with the FTBFS, in case that they are interested in using kaffe on those platforms. cheers, dal

Re: Let Jikes (finally) go into testing on its own...

2004-01-19 Thread Grzegorz B. Prokopski
W liście z pon, 19-01-2004, godz. 02:10, Adam Majer pisze: > On Sun, Jan 18, 2004 at 09:49:44PM -0500, Grzegorz B. Prokopski wrote: > > W li?cie z nie, 18-01-2004, godz. 19:41, Adam Majer pisze: > > > PS. Furthermore, since these wrappers are NOT and should not be dependent > > > on version of th

Re: Let Jikes (finally) go into testing on its own...

2004-01-19 Thread Adam Majer
On Sun, Jan 18, 2004 at 09:49:44PM -0500, Grzegorz B. Prokopski wrote: > W li?cie z nie, 18-01-2004, godz. 19:41, Adam Majer pisze: > > PS. Furthermore, since these wrappers are NOT and should not be dependent > > on version of the JVM (or kaffe), they should be maintained such that > > they work