Subject of the message: Thank you!
Recipient of the message: Hermann, Terry
Subject of the message: Thank you!
Recipient of the message: Thompson, Elaine
Subject of the message: Thank you!
Recipient of the message: Cook, MaryAnn
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 12:31:44AM +0100, Hubert Schmid wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Oct 2003, Jan Schulz wrote:
> > nitpick: I find the mpkg-* idea better :) What about mpkg-java or
> > mpkg-j2se? At least it make sit clear that a package is created.
>
> I will think about this. But at least, the package
It is trivial to compile and install du from the coreutils/testing source
package and manually install just the du binary in /usr/local/bin/ so a
"proper" fix for woody is not worth it.
I tried to rewrite the diskusage() function using various other
combinations of commands but it never gave the s
Jan Schulz wrote:
Hallo!
Hallo Jan,
Theoretically (actually: practically) SWT is runable with kaffe, so
swt could be build on other platforms. Eclipse on the other hand will
not run on a current kaffe.
Not yet, but Mark Wielaard (I bet you remember him from our policy
discussion) has been playin
j2se-package_0.2 from http://www.stud.uni-karlsruhe.de/~ude2/debian/
in /usr/lib/j2se-package/common.sh
in function diskusage()
uses command "du -sm --apparent-size"
The du command from woody (debian 3.0) does not recognise --apparent-size.
It would be nice if this could be fixed so it works for
On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 10:51:23AM -0500, Grzegorz B. Prokopski wrote:
>
> PS: I hope d-l people won't mind us Cc:ing them from now on. We surely
> don't want to make it another IANAL-discussion which brigns nothing
> so we need some help. Please Cc:d-l when it makes sense.
>
Last I checked, the
W liście z czw, 30-10-2003, godz. 05:32, Dalibor Topic pisze:
> Anyway, we're switching kaffe's class library over to GNU Classpath,
> which is GPL + linking exception, and that should make the people who
> support FSFs interpretation happy, too, as GNU Classpath explicitely
> allows linking to
Hi!
Below is the mail that I sent yesterday to debian-java NOT putting Cc:
to d-legal as I thought the issue was really clear to me. After some
duscussion that began after my email (see
http://lists.debian.org/debian-java/2003/debian-java-200310/msg00107.html
) it was requested to bring it on to d
Hallo Dalibor,
* Dalibor Topic wrote:
>>Anyway: if thats true, that it will kill kaffe in debian, as we could
>>not use it with almost any programm, because in one way or another,
>>they all include apache licensed libs (-> jakarta project).
>Don't agree. ;) Even if this was true, it would be good
Hi,
On Thu, 2003-10-30 at 11:32, Dalibor Topic wrote:
> Jan Schulz wrote:
> > * Dalibor Topic wrote:
> >
> >>* figure out how you want to interpret the GPL in this case. The rest
> >>follows from that.
> >>
> >>>Problems not touched: *execution* of GPL-incompatible code using
> >>> GPLed libs an
Jan Schulz wrote:
Hallo Dalibor,
* Dalibor Topic wrote:
* figure out how you want to interpret the GPL in this case. The rest
follows from that.
Problems not touched: *execution* of GPL-incompatible code using
GPLed libs and/or GPLed JVMs is beyond the scope of this message.
Could you please
Dalibor Topic wrote:
B) me (and I guess a few others who are not lawyers, either):
As GPL only really talks about derived works, in order to decide if the
GPL applies to a work we must try to see if the new work is derived from
a GPLd work, or not.
FWIW, this is also my POV after reading some of
Hallo Dalibor,
* Dalibor Topic wrote:
>* figure out how you want to interpret the GPL in this case. The rest
>follows from that.
>>Problems not touched: *execution* of GPL-incompatible code using
>> GPLed libs and/or GPLed JVMs is beyond the scope of this message.
Could you please take this two
Hallo Hubert,
* Hubert Schmid wrote:
>On Mon, 27 Oct 2003, Jan Schulz wrote:
>> * Hubert Schmid wrote:
>> nitpick: I find the mpkg-* idea better :) What about mpkg-java or
>> mpkg-j2se? At least it make sit clear that a package is created.
>I will think about this. But at least, the package and th
14 matches
Mail list logo
