"E.L. Willighagen (Egon)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 22 July 2003 10:39, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> > > RHUG: http://sources.redhat.com/rhug/ really is cool. The only sad
> > > thing is that it is all build as RPMs done for RedHat systems. Would
> > > be really nice to also have rea
"E.L. Willighagen (Egon)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 22 July 2003 10:39, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> > > RHUG: http://sources.redhat.com/rhug/ really is cool. The only sad
> > > thing is that it is all build as RPMs done for RedHat systems. Would
> > > be really nice to also have rea
On Tuesday 22 July 2003 10:39, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> > RHUG: http://sources.redhat.com/rhug/ really is cool. The only sad
> > thing is that it is all build as RPMs done for RedHat systems. Would
> > be really nice to also have real Debian packages of all his stuff. (I
> > asked him if he
On Tuesday 22 July 2003 10:39, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> > RHUG: http://sources.redhat.com/rhug/ really is cool. The only sad
> > thing is that it is all build as RPMs done for RedHat systems. Would
> > be really nice to also have real Debian packages of all his stuff. (I
> > asked him if he
Ben Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> I certainly don't believe we should remove versioned JARs until we can
> come up with a solution that addresses the API problem. The current
> solution is like giving a C library an soname that is equal to the
> application version. If we remove
I already try on d-mentors but I got no response.
Any gentle DD here? :)
-- Arnaud Vandyck
http://alioth.debian.org/users/arnaud-guest/
--- Begin Message ---
Hi all,
The sponsor for libgef-java (gadek) seems to be very busy at the moment
(this is one of the reason I did take the ar
Ben Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/docs/java/gnome$ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib/jni gij-3.3
> > First
> > is OK :)
>
> Hmm, what happens if you use LTDL_LIBRARY_PATH instead of
> LD_LIBRARY_PATH? This is essentially what the gij-wrapper script is
> doing.
>
> If LD_LI
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/docs/java/gnome$ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib/jni gij-3.3
> First
> is OK :)
Hmm, what happens if you use LTDL_LIBRARY_PATH instead of
LD_LIBRARY_PATH? This is essentially what the gij-wrapper script is
doing.
If LD_LIBRARY_PATH works but LTDL_LIBRARY_PATH does not then the w
Ben Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> I certainly don't believe we should remove versioned JARs until we can
> come up with a solution that addresses the API problem. The current
> solution is like giving a C library an soname that is equal to the
> application version. If we remove
I already try on d-mentors but I got no response.
Any gentle DD here? :)
-- Arnaud Vandyck
http://alioth.debian.org/users/arnaud-guest/
--- Begin Message ---
Hi all,
The sponsor for libgef-java (gadek) seems to be very busy at the moment
(this is one of the reason I did take the ar
Ben Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/docs/java/gnome$ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib/jni gij-3.3 First
> > is OK :)
>
> Hmm, what happens if you use LTDL_LIBRARY_PATH instead of
> LD_LIBRARY_PATH? This is essentially what the gij-wrapper script is
> doing.
>
> If LD_LIBRARY
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/docs/java/gnome$ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib/jni gij-3.3 First
> is OK :)
Hmm, what happens if you use LTDL_LIBRARY_PATH instead of
LD_LIBRARY_PATH? This is essentially what the gij-wrapper script is
doing.
If LD_LIBRARY_PATH works but LTDL_LIBRARY_PATH does not then the wrap
Ben Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I'll re-do some tests but I'm sure it did not work neither with gij
> > nor kaffe!
>
> Are you using gij-wrapper (and not just gij)?
Maybe I missed something:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/docs/java/gnome$ gij-
gij-3.3 gij-wrapper-3.3
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/docs/
Edward Murray wrote:
I'm pretty certain that this is a bug in the woody tomcat4 package.
That's true, see http://bugs.debian.org/198226 for details and why I
can't fix it in woody.
Stefan
Ben Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I'll re-do some tests but I'm sure it did not work neither with gij
> > nor kaffe!
>
> Are you using gij-wrapper (and not just gij)?
Maybe I missed something:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/docs/java/gnome$ gij-
gij-3.3 gij-wrapper-3.3
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/docs/
Edward Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Can anybody else confirm this problem with tomcat4?
I have the same problem. Starting Tomcat4 at startup via
/etc/rc2.d/tomcat4 does not work but running "/etc/init.d/tomcat4
start" from the command line works.
This has been reported on the BTS and mark
Edward Murray wrote:
I'm pretty certain that this is a bug in the woody tomcat4 package.
That's true, see http://bugs.debian.org/198226 for details and why I
can't fix it in woody.
Stefan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROT
Edward Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Can anybody else confirm this problem with tomcat4?
I have the same problem. Starting Tomcat4 at startup via
/etc/rc2.d/tomcat4 does not work but running "/etc/init.d/tomcat4
start" from the command line works.
This has been reported on the BTS and mark
18 matches
Mail list logo
