I'm trying to run a java app. How do install and use java ?
It looks like there are different java runtime environemnts I can use
(eg. kaffe, gcj, etc). I don't anything about them or how to use them.
Which is the best and easiest to use with Debian ? ie. what can I
"apt-get install" and ge
Adam Heath wrote:
On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Max Kellermann wrote:
Is it planned to support natively compiled .JAR classes which can be loaded
using custom (pure Java) ClassLoader instances?
gcj supports loading precompiled .class files.
gcj supports loading precompiled .jar(and all other variant) files
On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Max Kellermann wrote:
> Is it planned to support natively compiled .JAR classes which can be loaded
> using custom (pure Java) ClassLoader instances?
gcj supports loading precompiled .class files.
gcj supports loading precompiled .jar(and all other variant) files.
gcj suppor
On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Max Kellermann wrote:
> On 0, Per Bothner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The most glaring missing feature in gcj is AWT. If you're
> > running server-style or other non-GUI application, I suggest
> > you try it. See htpp://gcc.gnu.org/java/
>
>
> Has anybody tried running
Adam Heath wrote:
>On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Max Kellermann wrote:
>
>>Is it planned to support natively compiled .JAR classes which can be loaded using
>custom (pure Java) ClassLoader instances?
>>
>
>gcj supports loading precompiled .class files.
>gcj supports loading precompiled .jar(and all other
On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Max Kellermann wrote:
> Is it planned to support natively compiled .JAR classes which can be loaded using
>custom (pure Java) ClassLoader instances?
gcj supports loading precompiled .class files.
gcj supports loading precompiled .jar(and all other variant) files.
gcj suppor
On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Max Kellermann wrote:
> On 0, Per Bothner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The most glaring missing feature in gcj is AWT. If you're
> > running server-style or other non-GUI application, I suggest
> > you try it. See htpp://gcc.gnu.org/java/
>
>
> Has anybody tried running
> "Max" == Max Kellermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Max> So if libgcj interprets the bytecode of dynamically loaded
Max> classes (or even whole applications like it is the case in
Max> Tomcat), this means that they do not run at native speed. They
Max> run at the speed of libgcj's integrated
> "Max" == Max Kellermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Max> I'm really looking forward to the gcj version that's stable and
Max> mature enough for everything.. cool project IMHO.
When you say `everything', what do you mean?
Java changes constantly. No free software implementation will ever
ke
> "Max" == Max Kellermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Max> So if libgcj interprets the bytecode of dynamically loaded
Max> classes (or even whole applications like it is the case in
Max> Tomcat), this means that they do not run at native speed. They
Max> run at the speed of libgcj's integrate
> "Max" == Max Kellermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Max> I'm really looking forward to the gcj version that's stable and
Max> mature enough for everything.. cool project IMHO.
When you say `everything', what do you mean?
Java changes constantly. No free software implementation will ever
k
On 0, Alexandre Petit-Bianco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> RHUG's jython relies on that feature to work: jython spits bytecode
> out of Python files and then interprets them. It is our intent to
> insert an optional compilation stage. libgcj could then load a shared
> object instead of a bytecode f
On 0, Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "Max" == Max Kellermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Max> Does gcj support loading new .JAR files dynamically at run-time
> Max> like with its .WAR files at all (i.e. creating custom ClassLoader
> Max> implementations)? I can hardly imagine h
Tom Tromey writes:
> libgcj includes a bytecode interpreter. I'm always amazed that
> people don't know that. It has been in the code for over 2 years
> now.
RHUG's jython relies on that feature to work: jython spits bytecode
out of Python files and then interprets them. It is our intent to
in
> "Max" == Max Kellermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Max> Does gcj support loading new .JAR files dynamically at run-time
Max> like with its .WAR files at all (i.e. creating custom ClassLoader
Max> implementations)? I can hardly imagine how it implements that
libgcj includes a bytecode inter
Max Kellermann writes:
> Has anybody tried running Tomcat with gcj? Tomcat should be THE Java
> server.. if anything should be supported, then Tomcat.
The person who imported it in the RHUG project (sources.redhat.com/rhug)
says that the servlet are working fine but JSP doesn't work yet.
Feel f
On 0, Alexandre Petit-Bianco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> RHUG's jython relies on that feature to work: jython spits bytecode
> out of Python files and then interprets them. It is our intent to
> insert an optional compilation stage. libgcj could then load a shared
> object instead of a bytecode
On 0, Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "Max" == Max Kellermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Max> Does gcj support loading new .JAR files dynamically at run-time
> Max> like with its .WAR files at all (i.e. creating custom ClassLoader
> Max> implementations)? I can hardly imagine
Tom Tromey writes:
> libgcj includes a bytecode interpreter. I'm always amazed that
> people don't know that. It has been in the code for over 2 years
> now.
RHUG's jython relies on that feature to work: jython spits bytecode
out of Python files and then interprets them. It is our intent to
i
> "Max" == Max Kellermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Max> Does gcj support loading new .JAR files dynamically at run-time
Max> like with its .WAR files at all (i.e. creating custom ClassLoader
Max> implementations)? I can hardly imagine how it implements that
libgcj includes a bytecode inte
Hi. Packages libeditline-java and libreadline-java won't build on ia64/m68k
which AFAICT have no java complier at all in main. I can't make them
architecture: all since they contain compiled JNI modules.
Thus the build-depends can't be satisfied on these architectures. Does this
mean I need
Max Kellermann writes:
> Has anybody tried running Tomcat with gcj? Tomcat should be THE Java
> server.. if anything should be supported, then Tomcat.
The person who imported it in the RHUG project (sources.redhat.com/rhug)
says that the servlet are working fine but JSP doesn't work yet.
Feel
FREE
SOFTWARE GIFT!
Don't forget your free software gift!
Great for holiday gift giving!
Many popular titles to choose from.
Hurry! This offer is only good
While supplies last!
Click Here: http://www.passionup.com/free.htm?lk=ob3
Let someone know how much y
FREEWARE: AS400 Library Catalog Software (source included.) As thanks for
visiting our web site at
www.rapidfire400.com, we would like you to have our CAT Freeware package.
You can use CAT to gather information about the files in a library and print
reports;
by Date Last
Hi. Packages libeditline-java and libreadline-java won't build on ia64/m68k
which AFAICT have no java complier at all in main. I can't make them
architecture: all since they contain compiled JNI modules.
Thus the build-depends can't be satisfied on these architectures. Does this
mean I nee
On 0, Per Bothner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The most glaring missing feature in gcj is AWT. If you're
> running server-style or other non-GUI application, I suggest
> you try it. See htpp://gcc.gnu.org/java/
Has anybody tried running Tomcat with gcj? Tomcat should be THE Java server..
if
On 0, Per Bothner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The most glaring missing feature in gcj is AWT. If you're
> running server-style or other non-GUI application, I suggest
> you try it. See htpp://gcc.gnu.org/java/
Has anybody tried running Tomcat with gcj? Tomcat should be THE Java server.. if
27 matches
Mail list logo
