On 0, Alexandre Petit-Bianco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > RHUG's jython relies on that feature to work: jython spits bytecode > out of Python files and then interprets them. It is our intent to > insert an optional compilation stage. libgcj could then load a shared > object instead of a bytecode file.
OK this already answers my question to Tom :-) I'm really looking forward to the gcj version that's stable and mature enough for everything.. cool project IMHO.
