On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 06:15:32PM -0700, Rob Helmer wrote:
> > > Well the java policy says that all java programs must have a startup
> > > script.
> >
> > 'java' is a program too, though, isn't it?
>
> Nope :
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 6:14pm ~ >cat `which java` | head
> #!/bin/sh
Yep, looks like
I've just re-uploaded the j2se1.3-i386 packages to fix the packaging
bug the original packages contained. Neither they nor the
j21.3-powerpc packages have made it to unstable yet, they're waiting
on the kindness of ftp-admins.
> "Ben" == Ben Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ben> I don'
I've just re-uploaded the j2se1.3-i386 packages to fix the packaging
bug the original packages contained. Neither they nor the
j21.3-powerpc packages have made it to unstable yet, they're waiting
on the kindness of ftp-admins.
> "Ben" == Ben Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ben> I don
Jeff Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think that's best. lib/ext is not overridable by *anything*, not even
> /usr/bin/java. Say I just installed the Tomcat 3.2 .deb, and it put
> servlet.jar (2.2) in lib/ext. Then I want to try out Tomcat 4.0 from
> CVS. It will break because it requires 2.3
Jeff Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think that's best. lib/ext is not overridable by *anything*, not even
> /usr/bin/java. Say I just installed the Tomcat 3.2 .deb, and it put
> servlet.jar (2.2) in lib/ext. Then I want to try out Tomcat 4.0 from
> CVS. It will break because it requires 2.
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 09:24:38AM +0930, Michael Gratton wrote:
>
> This should have gone to the list..
>
> --
> ? Mike Gratton - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ! Leader in leachate production and transmission since 1976.
> > http://web.vee.net/
> Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 12:13:01 +0930
> From: Michael Gr
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 01:29:34PM -0700, Stephen Zander wrote:
>
> Note that there are known issues with the mozilla plug-in this release.
> These packages also use the new java2-compiler & java2-runtime
That is good. :)
Regards,
// Ola
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>
> Format: 1.7
>
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 11:20:28PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 10:44:30AM -0700, Bill Wohler wrote:
> > > Probably not. So the lib/ext dir should be empty, right?
> >
> > Disagree. There is a world of difference between jars you install
> > and jars you serendipitousl
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 10:24:07AM +1000, Jeff Turner wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 09:21:15AM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 09:59:09AM +1000, Jeff Turner wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 02:15:04PM -0700, Bill Wohler wrote:
> [..]
> > > Symlinking jars can be dange
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 09:24:38AM +0930, Michael Gratton wrote:
>
> This should have gone to the list..
>
> --
> ? Mike Gratton - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ! Leader in leachate production and transmission since 1976.
> > http://web.vee.net/
> Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 12:13:01 +0930
> From: Michael G
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 01:29:34PM -0700, Stephen Zander wrote:
>
> Note that there are known issues with the mozilla plug-in this release.
> These packages also use the new java2-compiler & java2-runtime
That is good. :)
Regards,
// Ola
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>
> Format: 1.7
>
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 11:20:28PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 10:44:30AM -0700, Bill Wohler wrote:
> > > Probably not. So the lib/ext dir should be empty, right?
> >
> > Disagree. There is a world of difference between jars you install
> > and jars you serendipitous
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 10:24:07AM +1000, Jeff Turner wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 09:21:15AM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 09:59:09AM +1000, Jeff Turner wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 02:15:04PM -0700, Bill Wohler wrote:
> [..]
> > > Symlinking jars can be dang
13 matches
Mail list logo
